Middle English Names Of Farmers: Etymologial And Functional Aspects
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/philolog0(257).2016.037%20-%2050
Abstract
The relevance of the research is due to the need for a comprehensive study of the Middle English vocabulary, in particular of occupational names as its subsystem, which goes in line with the traditional systemic-structural paradigm of linguistic researches focusing on the modern functional-systemic approach to the language phenomena. The article is devoted to the general purpose of the study of the etymological composition and functional differentiation of the thematic group of Middle English names of farmers.
The study of etymology of the vocabulary under investigation is based on the analysis of the word stems. Lexical borrowings are studied according to the nearest etymology, i. e. according to the language which is a source of penetration of the word into the English language. The investigation of the functional differentiation of the Middle English occupational names is based on the principles of the functional-systemic approach to the language, especially the communicative and historical approaches. Middle English occupational names are distributed into two classes – common nouns (in their nominating function) and proper names, especially family names (in the function of identification of the person as the component additional to the personal name in the personal nomination formula). Within each etymological group of vocabulary we distribute the lexical material according to the functional principle and distinguish three groups of occupational names: those functioning exclusively as common nouns; those functioning exclusively as the proper names in the personal nomination formulas; those functioning as common nouns as well as the proper names. According to the functional principle of the distribution of the vocabulary and on the quantitative calculations we draw the conclusions about the degree of sustainability of the usage of borrowed occupational names: we consider English derivatives formed on the basis of assimilated loan-blends as well as the assimilated borrowings that functioned as the common nouns and proper names to be the words with the established usage; we consider the derivatives formed on the basis of assimilated loanwords as well as the assimilated borrowings that existed exclusively as proper names to be the words with the restricted usage; we consider he derivatives formed on the basis of assimilated loanwords as well as the assimilated borrowings that existed only as the personal name in the nomination formula to be the words with the unsettled usage. It was found out that functional differentiation of the vocabulary is different in English and borrowed occupational terms as well as within the lexical-thematic subgroups.
The study of the Middle English names of farmers in the etymological and functional aspects revealed the following quantitative data: 66 names of farmers constitute 3% of the total number of Middle English occupational terms. The ratio of English names of farmers as to the loanwords is 16:1. The prevailing majority (44%) are the words with the established usage. Data obtained in the study under review are valuable as the constituent part of the comprehensive study of the etymology and usage of the Middle English vocabulary.
References
Hanych, D. I. & Oliinyk, I. S. (1985). Slovnyk linhvistychnykh terminiv [A Dictionary of the Linguistic Terminology]. Kyiv, Vyshcha shkola, 360 р. (In Ukrainian).
Gromova, E. A. (2011). Diakhronicheskie izmeneniya slovarnogo sostava angliyskogo yazyka: dis. … kand. filol nauk. [Diachronic Changes of English Vocabulary]. Dis. … cand. philol. sciences. Rostov-na-Donu, 215 p. (In Russian).
Dobrovolska, O. Ia. (2016). Ahentyvno-profesiina leksyka serednoanhliiskoho periodu: istoryko-etymolohichnyi aspekt // Topical Issues of Romance and German Philology and Applied Linguistics: Scientific Journal (Ed. Kushneryk, V. I. et al.) [Middle English Occupational Names: Historic-Etymologic Aspect]// Chernivtsi, Publishing House “RODOVID”, issue 11-12, part 1, p. 173-178. (In Ukrainian).
Dobrovolska, O. Ia. (2016). Prizvyshcheva systema serednoanhliiskoho periodu yak dzherelo vyvchennia apeliatyvnoi leksyky: linhvistychnyi ta sotsialno-istorychnyi aspekty // Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy. Seriia «Filolohichni nauky» (Ed. Nikolaienko, S. M. et al.) [Middle English Family Names as a Source of Study of Middle English Vocabulary: Linguistic and Social-Historical Aspects]. Kyiv, Millenium, vol. 248, p. 30-45. (In Ukrainian).
Kosminskiy, E. A. (1947). Issledovaniya po agrarnoy istorii Anglii XIII v. [The Study of the History of Agriculture in England in the XIIIth century]. Moscow Leningrad, Izd-vo AN SSSR, 485 p. (In Russian).
Podolskaia, N. V. (1988). Slovar russkoi onomastycheskoi termynologyy [Dictionary of the Personal Names Study Terminology]. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian).
Solonovych, T. F. (1986). Razvytye tematycheskoi gruppy naymenovanyi lyts po professyy v anglyiskom yazyke: dis. … cand. filol. nauk [The Development of the Thematic Group of the Occupational Names in the English Language]. Dis. …cand. philol. sciences. Minsk, 204 р. (In Russian)
Shynkaruk, V.D. Dyskursyvne vyslovliuvannia yak funktsionalno-movlennieva odynytsia (1996) [Discursive statement as functionally-speech unit ]. Zbirnyk “Struktura ta semantyka movnykh odynyts u funktsionalnomu aspekti” [Bulletin The structure and semantics of language units in the functional aspect ]/ . – Chernivtsi: ChDU, 1996. – S.180-192.
Fransson, G. (1935). Middle English Surnames of Occupation (1100-1350). Lund, C. W. K. Gleerup, 217 p.
King, E. England 1175-1425. (1979). London, 214 p.
Middle English Compendium. University of Michigan Digital Library Production Service, 2001-2013. – 15000 р. – [online version]. – Mode of access: http: //www. quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/ (accessed 23.07.2016)
Middle English Dictionary. (1952-2001) / [ed. Hans Kurath, Sherman M. Kuhn, Robert E. Lewis]. Ann Arbor, Michigan, Univ. of Michigan Press; London, G. Cumberledge, OUP. [in 21 v.].
Mills, A. D. (1968). Notes on some Middle English Occupational Terms [Studia Neophilologica: a Journal of Germanic and Romance Philology]. Uppsala, v. 40. – N I.: 35 48.
Myers, A. R. (1978). England in the Late Middle Ages. Harmondsworth, 285 p.
Otto, G. (1938). Die Handwekernamen in Mittelenglishen [Middle English Occupational name]. Bottrop, 99 p. (In German).
Oxford English Dictionary. (1961). A corrected re-issue with an introduction, supplement, and bibliography of a New English Dictionary on Historical Principles. Oxford at the Clarendon Press, V. I – XII.
Reaney, P. H. (1966). A Dictionary of British Surnames. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 366 p.
Stratmann, F. H. (1951). A Middle-English Dictionary containing words used by English writers from the 12th to the 15th century [A new. ed., rearranged, revised and enlarged by H. Bradley]. London, 708 p.
Thuresson, S. (1950). Middle English Occupational Terms. Lund, CWK Gleerup; Copenhagen, Ejnar Munksgaard, 285 p.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.