Welfare problems of horses

Authors

  • V. V. Nedosekov National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • Y. P. Krytsia National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2021.02.011

Keywords:

welfare, horse, biosecurity, quality of life, feeding, housing, management

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the basic concepts of animal welfare, which is a prerequisite for quality and successful innovative animal husbandry. The horses welfare should be considered from the standpoint of the concept of the "five freedoms", which should be reflected in the lives of animals.

The aim of the article is to analyze the state of the horses welfare and the prospects of development and implementation at the national and European levels.

The analysis indicates the need to develop a system for assessing the welfare of horses and its implementation in Ukraine, while, taking into account objective and subjective indicators, the system for assessing the welfare of horses should include owners, veterinarians (horse care) and experts.

To assess the welfare of sport horses, the Veterinary Regulations (BP) of the International Equestrian Federation (FEI) must be used during the competition, which must be observed during the event.

Methods for assessing the degree of welfare, characterize the condition of the animal in both external and internal indicators, but the dominant is stress, which through the nervous and endocrine systems adversely affect all parts of the immune system.

In Ukraine, the horse population has tripled reduce in thirty years and continues to decline, but the analysis of horse welfare in Ukraine is either not conducted at all, or is sporadic and mainly aimed at assessing individual animal health indicators (assessment of body condition, lameness, etc.).

Therefore, in Ukraine it is necessary to establish criteria and develop a system for assessing the welfare of horses, improving the legal framework and implementation in practice. A plan of recommended action for stakeholders (federations, veterinarians, horse owners, government services, etc.) was presented, and it was recommended to develop and implement criteria for assessing the welfare of horses that could be used to study animal welfare.

We believe that the system of horse welfare assessment as a consulting tool is necessary for the standardization of survey and analysis of welfare, to develop measures to optimize the management of horses, which should be the main document of equestrian associations of Ukraine.

In addition, legislation on the welfare of horses is crucial, but there is no legislation acts in the field of welfare.

Undoubtedly, in combination with the welfare of horses, it is important to develop an algorithm for biosecurity in the horses management with an emphasis on the epizootology of diseases, vaccination conditions, disinfection and analysis of critical points of admission to animals, which should be the basis for the development of the National Standard for Welfare and Biosecurity at the level of horse farms in Ukraine.

References

Veterynarnyi rehlament. Mizhnarodna federatsiia kinnoho sportu FEI (14-e vyd., 2018 r., diie z 01.01.2020) [Veterinary regulations. Fédération Equestre Internationale FEI (14th ed., 2018, effective January 1, 2020)]. Available at: https://fksr.org/files/uploads/Veterinarnyj_reglament_FEI_2020.pdf

Koni na perepravi. Yak vyzhyvaie ukrainske koniarstvo [Horses at the crossing. How Ukrainian horse breeding survives]. 25.12.2020. Available at: https://hromadske.ua/posts/koni-na-perepravi-yak-vizhivaye-ukrayinske-konyarstvo

Kos'yanchuk, N., Nedosekov, V. (2016). Zdorovya ta dobrobut tvaryn [Animal health and welfare]. Intellectual potential of the xxi century, 18-23. Available at: http://www.sworld.education/conference/year-conference-sw/the-content-of-conferences/archives-of-individual-conferences/nov-2016

Krytsia, Y. P. (2007). Imunnyi status i yoho korektsiia u konei chystokrovnoi ta ukrainskoi verkhovykh porid [Immune status and its correction at the horses of Purebred Saddle and Ukrainian Saddle breeds]. National Agrarian University. Kyiv. 22s.

Mizhnarodnyi forum kinnoi spilnoty Ukrainy "Horse&I" [International forum of the equestrian community of Ukraine "Horse&I"]. (2019). Available at: http://fksk.org.ua/images/2020/Dokumenty/Veterinariya-mini.pdf

Nedosekov, V. Kravchenko, A., Kleimenov, I. (2020). Blahopoluchchia kurei-nesuchok v industrialnomu vyrobnytstvi [Welfare of laying hens in the industrial production]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 4 (85), 66-77.

https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2587-666X.2020.4.66

Sobol, O. (2020). Ekolohichno-obgruntovani stratehii vypasannia konei yak zasib zapobihannia pasovyshchnoi dyhresii [Environmentally sound strategies for grazing horses as a means of preventing pasture digression]. ІІІ International Scientific and Practical Conference «Ecological problems of the environment and rational nature management in the context of sustainable development». (October, 22-23, 2020). Kherson. P. 580-583.

Sobol, O. (2020). Ohliad osnovnykh pidkhodiv do otsinky yakosti zhyttia konei heriatrychnoi hrupy [An overview of the main approaches to the evaluation of the quality of life of geriatric horses]. Tavrichesky scientific bulletin, 115, 216-224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32851/2226-0099.2020.115.31

Australian Horse Industry Council. Pony club Australia. Horse Welfare Policy (2017). Available at: www.horsecouncil.org.au

AWIN (2015). AWIN Welfare Assessment Protocol for Horses, 80. doi: 10.13130 / AWIN_HORSES_2015

Baumgartner, M., Zeitler-Feicht, M. (2017). Beurteilung der Tiergerechtheit von Pferdehaltungen - Entwicklung, Aufbau und Beratungsmöglichkeit anhand des Weihenstephaner Bewertungssystems. Tierärztl. Umschau 72. Pp. 331-339.

Broom, D. M. (2004). Bienestar animal. In Etologнa Aplicada ed. F.Galindo Maldonado and A. Orihuela Trujillo, U.N.A.M.: Mexico City (in Spanish). Pp. 51-87. Available at: https://ciwf.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/AW_Broom.pdf

Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (BMELV)/ Waldbericht der Bundesregierung 2009. Juni. (2009). Available at: https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/_Tiere/Tierschutz/Tierversuche/2009-TierversuchszahlenGesamt.html

Code of practice for the welfare of horses, ponies, donkeys and their hybrids (2017). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/code-of-practice-for-the-welfare-of-horses-ponies-donkeys-and-their-hybrids#history

Costa, E. D., Murray, L., Dai, F., Canali, E., Minero, M. (2014). Equine on-farm welfare assessment: a review of animal-based indicators. Animal Welfare, 23, 323-341. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.3.323

Guide to good animal welfare practice for the keeping, care, training and use of donkeys and donkey hybrids (2020). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/animals/docs/aw_platform_plat-conc_guide_donkeys.pdf

Horseman, S. V., Buller, H., Mullan, S., Whay, H. R. (2016). Current Welfare Problems Facing Horses in Great Britain as Identified by Equine Stakeholders. PLoS ONE, 11, 8, e0160269.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160269

Іreland, J. L., Clegg, P. D, McGowan, C. M. et al. (2012). Disease prevalence in geriatric horses in the United Kingdom: veterinary clinical assessment of 200 cases. Equine Veterinary Journal, 44, 101-106. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21668494.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00361.x

Left on the verge: In the grip of a horse crisis in England and Wales (2013). Available at: https://www.redwings.org.uk/sites/default/files/Left%20on%20 the%20verge%20-%20in%20the%20grip%20of%20an%20equine%20crisis %20in%20England%20and%20Wales%202013.pdf

Lesimple, C. (2020). Indicators of Horse Welfare: State-of-the-Art Clémence Lesimple. Animals. MDPI, 294, 10. Available at: https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02477496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020294

Luna, D., Vásquez, R. A., Rojas, M., Tadich, T. A. (2017). Welfare status of working horses and owners perceptions of their animals. Animals, 56, 7. doi: 10.3390/ani7080056. Available at: www.mdpi.com/journal/animals. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080056

Mejdell, C. M. (2004). Keeping of horses - from an animal welfare point of view. NORSK Veterinærtidsskrift, 116, 2, 85-94. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255814982_Keeping_of_horses_from_an_animal_welfare_point_of_view

Minero, M., Canali, E. (2009). Welfare issues of horses: an overview and practical recommendations. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8:sup1, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.219

Rioja-Lang, F. C., Connor, M., Bacon, H. and Dwyer, C. M. (2020). Determining a Welfare Prioritization for Horses Using a Delphi Method. Animals, 647, 10. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/4/647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040647

Rioja-Lang, F. C., Connor, M., Bacon, H. J., Lawrence, A. B. Dwyer, C. M. (2020). Prioritization of Farm Animal Welfare. Issues Using Expert Consensus. Front. Vet. Sci., 6, 495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00495

Published

2021-04-28

Issue

Section

Veterinary medicine, quality and safety of livestock products