Marsh vegetation of the steps rivers of the Mykolaiv region and its state in modern ecological and hydrological environment conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2020.02.002Keywords:
marshes, marsh vegetation, Mykolaiv region, floodplain of the Southern Buh, the Buh left bank area, ecological and hydrological changesAbstract
Over the last decades, the natural marsh vegetation of the steppe rivers in the investigated area has periodically been a subject of researches, mainly botanically oriented, whereas systematic environmental studies have rarely been conducted. Accordingly, the purpose of this research was to study and evaluate the status of marsh vegetation in the existing ecological and hydrological conditions of the steppe rivers in the Buh left bank area within the borders of Mykolaiv region.
The results of original studies of the Lower Pobuzhia left bank steppe watercourses, their floodplains and phytogroups made the basic material for investigation. These studies were carried out during expeditionary-route observations of the small rivers, performed in 2017-2019.
Standard methods of field hydrological, landscape and botanical surveys were chosen as the main research methods. Standard formulae of the Simpson index were used to estimate the species richness of the floristic complexes under study.
In the course of geological and hydrological studies, it was found that the main feature of the Buh-Inhul interfluve is the absence of powerful reservoir strata. This causes the limitation of groundwater reserves, which play a key role in maintaining the summer-autumn flow of the small rivers. Their drying directly points to the scanty water reserves of surface horizons. These negative processes are exacerbated by the impact of anthropogenic pressure on river valleys (plowing, grazing) and aridity of the climate.
In the investigated area, the main part of marsh vegetation is concentrated in the lower reaches of the rivers, flatter southern regions of the interfluve. The spatial and species structure of the latter is generally typical for short-flow watercourses. Thus, the factor of the hydrological regime of the ecotope of the floodplains contributes to the differentiation of biotopes and their vegetation cover. According to the latter, we distinguish: biotopes of constant water flowage; biotopes of partial watering and excess humidification; biotopes of sufficient and insufficient humidification.
It is established that, due to the instability of the trophic modes and the flowability of the hydrotope, the marsh biotopes of constant flow rate have low levels of phytodiversity (Simpson index – 1.6 (average index)) and are typical for the valley bottoms of the South Buh, the Inhul and only the estuarine sections of medium and small steppe streams. Within this group of biotopes, we distinguish biotopes of low water flowage/flowing freshwater and brackish water reservoirs inhabited by Confervaceae, Lemnoideae, Hydrocharitaceae, and Potamogetonaceae coenoses. The latter have adapted to the constant hydrogen fluctuations and salt regime of the hydrotope.
Ecotonic, coastal areas of periodic flooding are captured by thickets of typical multi-species wetland Cyperaceae and Gramineae coenoses which have the highest level of phytodiversity (Simpson index – 3.2) and are adapted to drastic changes in water level fluctuations.
Wetland and meadow biotopes of sufficient humidification are characterized by a high level of floristic richness (Simpson index – 2.68) and populated by polydominant hygromesophytes, mesophytes, meadow-halophytic and halophytic coenoses. At the same time, the salinity of the edaphotope cases a significant decrease in species richness (Simpson index – 1.8) and simplification of the species structure of phytogroups. The latter are formed by species of broad ecological amplitude, which are able to exist both in conditions of excess moisture (flood period) and periodic drought of the edaphotope (boundary period).
Up to 25% of the floodplain area of the steppe rivers is represented by zones of insufficient wetting, significant anthropogenic land degradation, which is atypical of the floodplain landscape. These conditions contribute to the unification of phyto-diversity (Simpson index – 2.23) and transformation of native floodplain vegetation into steppe meadows on the basis of mesoxerophyte dwarf herbage with a considerable proportion of ruderals (up to 50% of projective coverage).
Thus, the marsh vegetation of the steppe rivers of the the Buh-Inhul interfluve is represented, to a greater extent, by herbaceous phytocoenoses formed by aquatic, marsh, meadow, psamophytic, halophytic and weed species. Among the ecological types, mesophytes predominate, but among the latter, the proportion of mesoxerophytes and halophytes has increased each year, transforming the floodplain eco-complexes into cenotically and floristically poor steppe and saline meadows.
Accordingly, the typical natural vegetation of floodplain biotopes of wetland type in the current adverse ecological and hydrological conditions of the steppe rivers of Mykolaiv region is extremely depressed. These processes, initiated by the powerful anthropogenic pressure along with aridization of the region's climate, contribute not only to the disappearance of the marsh vegetation, but also to the threat of the total disappearance of the marshes, as natural areas with the unique level of biodiversity of natural complexes.
The prospects for further investigations are seen in more detailed ecological-hydrological and ecological-botanical studies of the steppe rivers’ marsh vegetation in Mykolaiv region left-bank areas.
References
Baranovskyi, B. O. (2005). Fitoriznomanittia zaplavy Pivdennoho Buhu v mezhakh maibutnoho zakaznyka «Plavni Nova Odesa» [Phytodiversity of the floodplain of the Southern Bug within the limits of the future preserve «Plavni Nova Odesa»]. Herald of the Dnepropetrovsk National University, 3/1, 3-6.
Dubyna, D. V., Noihoizlova, Z., Dziuba, T. P., Sheliah- Sosonko, Yu. R. (2004). Klasyfikatsiia ta prodromus roslynnosti vodoim, perezvolozhenykh terytorii ta aren Pivnichnoho Prychornomor'ia [Classification and list of vegetation of reservoirs, drained territories and arches of the Northern Black Sea coast]. Kyiv: Fitosotsiotsentr, 200.
Dubyna, D. V., Dziuba, T. P., Emelianova, S. M. (2013). Roslynnyi svit vodno-bolotnykh uhid Pivnichnoho Prychornomor'ia ta stratehiia yikh okhorony [The vegetative world of the wetlands of the Northern Black Sea coast and the strategy of their protection]. Ekolohiia vodno-bolotnykh uhid i torfovyshch: materialy mizhnar. nauk-prakt. konf. «Metody i tekhnolohii stratehichnoho planuvannia rozvytku terytorii» [Ecology of wetlands and peatlands: materials of international science-practice. conf. "Methods and technologies of strategic planning of territories development]. Kyiv, 84-91.
Dubyna, D. V. (2006). Vyshcha vodna roslynnist. Roslynnist Ukrainy [Higher aquatic vegetation. Vegetation of Ukraine]: pid red. Yu. R. Sheliah-Sosonko. Kyiv: Fitosotsiotsentr, 412.
Dubyna, D. V. (2007). Halofitna roslynnist. Roslynnist Ukrainy [Halophytic vegetation. Vegetation of Ukraine]: pid red. Yu. R. Sheliah-Sosonko. Kyiv: Fitosotsiotsentr, 315.
Havrykov, Yu. S., Marushevskyi, H. B. (Eds) (2009). Ekolohichnyi atlas baseinu richky Pivdennyi Buh [Ecological Atlas of the Southern Bug River Basin]. Vinnytsia: Vetlands Interneshenl, 19.
Hopchenko, E. D., Loboda, N. S. (2005). Vodnye resursy severo-zapadnoho Prychernomoria (v estestvennykh y narushennykh khoziaistvennoi deiatelnostiu uslovyiakh) [Water resources of the northwestern Black Sea (under natural and disturbed economic conditions]. Kyiv: KNT, 188.
Khilchevskoho, V. K. (Ed) (2009). Vodni resursy ta yakist richkovykh vod baseinu Pivdennoho Buhu [Water resources and quality of river waters of the Southern Bug basin]. Kyiv, 184.
Mazur, I. O. (2017). Ekolohichna otsinka stanu fitotsenoziv plavnevykh biotopiv v mezhyrichchi Tylihulu - Pivdennoho Buhu [Ecological assessment of the state of phytocenoses of the marsh biotopes in the Tylihul - Southern Buh interfluve]. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Agroecology and Natural resources. Kyiv, 23.
Natsionalnyi atlas Ukrainy [National Atlas of Ukraine]. Available at: https://atlas.igu.org.ua/maps_elektron.html
Otsinka vrazlyvosti do zminy klimatu: Ukraina. Klimatychnyi forum skhidnoho partnerstva ta Robocha hrupa hromadskykh orhanizatsii zi zminy klimatu [Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Ukraine. The Eastern Partnership Climate Forum and the Working Group of NGOs on Climate Change]. Available at: http://necu.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/ukraine_cc_vulnerability.pdf
Rudenko, L. H. (Ed.) (2007). Natsionalnyi atlas Ukrainy [National Atlas of Ukraine]. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Geography, State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre. Kyiv: DNVP «Kartohrafiia», 435.
Vasylkivska, O. B. (2010). Suchasnyi hidrobiolohichnyi stan baseiniv malykh richok Dniprovsko-Dnistrovskoho mezhyrichchia [The present-day hydrobiological status of the basins of small rivers of the Dnieper-Dnistrovsky rivers]. Hydrology, hydrochemistry and hydroecology. 2010. 18. 290-293.
Vorona, Ye. I., Kyryliach, O. V., Maksymeniuk, O. D., Marushevskyi, H. B. (2009). Basein richky Boh [River Basin Boh]. Vinnytsia-Kyiv: Wetlands International Black Sea Programme, 128.
Vynokurov, D. S. (2012). Halofitna roslynnist dolyny r. Inhul [Halophytic vegetation of the Ingul valley]. IV vidkrytyi z'izd fitobiolohiv Prychornomor'ia: zbirka tez dopovidei. [IV Black Sea Phytobiologists Convention: Summary of Abstracts]. Kherson: Ailant, 55.
Vynokurov, D. S. (2013). Vodno-bolotni uhiddia malykh ta serednikh richok stepovoi zony Ukrainy (botanichnyi aspekt) [Wetlands of small and medium-sized rivers of the steppe zone of Ukraine (botanical aspect)]. Ecology of wetlands and peatlands (collection of scientific articles). Kyiv: DIA, 24-27.
Vynokurov, D. S. (2016). Roslynnist dolyny r.Inhul: syntaksonomiia, dynamika, okhorona [Vegetation of the Ingul valley: syntaxonomy, dynamics, protection] National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv, 21.
Zhovnir, V. V., Hrebin, V. V. (2018). Analitychnyi ohliad doslidzhen minimalnoho stoku vody [Analytical review of studies of minimum water runoff]. Hydrology, hydrochemistry and hydroecology. 1, 16-24
Andersen, H. E. (2003). Hydrology, nutrient processes and vegetation in floodplain wetlands. PhD thesis. National Environmental Research Institute. Denmark. 36.
Effects of Natural and Human Disturbances on Floodplain Vegetation Norbert Miiller Dr., Priv.-Doz. for Vegetation Ecology at Technical University Berlin, Available at: https://www.fh-erfurt.de/lgf/fileadmin/LA/Personen/Mueller/prevPub/FloodplainVegetation.pdf
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).