Development of a method for assessing risks of food fraud and food defense as a component of food safety management

Authors

  • Yu. V. Sliva National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2021.01.010

Keywords:

risk management, identification method, evaluation criteria, VACCP and TACCP concept, economically motivated fraud, defense.

Abstract

The work is devoted to the development and substantiation of the method of identification and assessment of risks of food protection from economically motivated fraud and bioterrorism, taking into account the requirements of international standards for the development and operation of food safety management systems.

The purpose of the work is to scientifically substantiate and develop a method of identification and assessment of risks of food protection from economically motivated fraud and bioterrorism, which is based on the concepts of VACCP and TACCP taking into account the requirements of international standards GLOBALG.A.P. and ISO 22000: 2018.

Research methods - theoretical and modeling (development of identification method and selection of risk assessment criteria), representative (presentation of the application of the developed method) and diagnostic. The latter tested the possibility of applying the developed method to assess the risks of protecting food products from economically motivated fraud and intentional harm, taking into account the requirements of international standards.

Results. A method for identifying and assessing the risks of food protection from economically motivated fraud and intentional harm, taking into account the requirements of international standards, developed criteria and methodology for risk assessment.

 

References

Damodaran A. Strategic risk taking: a framework for risk management. - Pearson Education Inc., 2008. - 388 p.

Bernstayn P. Protiv bogov. Ukroshcheniye riska. - M.: Olimp-Biznes, 2008. - 400 p.

Bayes T. An essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances // Bayes's essay in the original notation: Website, 2017. URL: http://www.stat.ucla. edu/history/essay.pdf (last accessed date: 15.02.2021).

Codex Alimentarius Commission (1999). Principles and Guidelines for the Conduct of Microbiological Risk Assessment. CAC/GL-30, In: Codex Alimentarius, 15.01.2011, Available from: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/standard_list.do?lang=es

Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). (2003). Recommended International Code of Practice - General Principles of Food Hygiene. CAC/RCP1-1969, Rev. 4-2003, In: Codex Alimentarius, 15.01.2011, Available from: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/standard_list.do?lang=es

Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). (2007). Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk management (MRM). CAC/GL 63-2007. In: Codex Alimentarius, 15.02.2011, Available from: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/standard_list.do?lang=es

Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). (2008). Guidelines for the validation of food safety control measures. CAC/GL 69-2008. In: Codex Alimentarius, 15.02.2011, Available from: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/standard_list.do?lang=es

European Commission; EFSA; TNS Opinion & Social (November 2010). Special eurobarometer 354. Food-related risks, In: EFSA, 15.02.2011, Available from: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/riskcommunication/riskperception.htm

European Food Safety Authority & European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (EFSA & ECDC). (2011). The European Union Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic Agents and Food-borne Outbreaks in 2009, EFSA Journal, Vol. 09, No. 3:2090, (March 2011) ISSN 1831-47

Food Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO). (2006a). Food Safety Risk Analysis. A guide for national food safety authorities. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper No. 87. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, ISBN 978-92-5-105604-2, Rome, Italy

Food Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO). (2006b). The Use of Microbiological Risk Assessment Outputs to Develop Practical Risk Management Strategies: Metrics to improve food safety, In: FAO, 15.01.2011, Available from: ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/agn/food/kiel.pdf

Food Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO). (n.d.). Assuring food safety and quality: guidelines for strengthening national food control systems. In: World Health Organization, 15.02.2011, Available from: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/capacity/en/Englsih_Guidelines_Food_control.pdf

CFR7.3 (2014). Defined in the US Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21 Food and drugs, Sub-chapter A General and Part 7 Enforcement policy, section 7.3 definitions URL: https://www. fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/IndustryGuidance/ucm129337.htm.

PAS 96:2017 Guide to protecting and defending food and drink from deliberate attack//https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/pas962017_0.pdf

FOOD STANDARDS AGENCY. Available from: https:// www.food.gov.uk/enforcement/the-national-foodcrime-unit/what-is-food-crime-and-food-fraud

US Pharmacopeial Convention's Food Fraud Database. Available from: http://www.foodfraud.org

ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2018. "Food Safety Management Systems: Requirements for Any Organization in the Food Chain." International Standard ISO 22000:2018(E), ISO, Geneva.

Slyva YU.V. Sertyfikatsiya silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkykh vyrobnytstv Ukrayiny vidpovidno do vymoh GLOBALGAP. Standartyzatsiya, sertyfikatsiya, yakistʹ. 2015, №1 (92). P. 26-29.

Kononovsʹkyy O.O., Slyva YU.V. Osoblyvosti provedennya otsinky ryzykiv pry vyroshchuvanni ovochiv z·hidno vymoh GLOBALG.A.P. versiya 5. Standartyzatsiya, sertyfikatsiya, yakistʹ. 2017. №4 (107). P. 19-30.

ISO 31000:2018 Risk management - Guidelines.

Downloads

Issue

No. 1(89) (2021)

Section

Technology of production and processing of livestock products

License

Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons  Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).