INFLUENCE OF BPS- 44 DRUG AND THE YEAST SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE EFFICIENCY OF BROILER VACCINATION AGAINST INFESTIOSUS BURSAE DISEASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2017.02.020Keywords:
chickens Broilers, probiotics, Infestiosus bursae disease vaccineAbstract
One of the problems in industrial poultry farming is to provide high resistance to disease. Today in Ukraine widely used vaccination of poultry against a major viral diseases - infectious Infestiosus bursae disease of chickens. In this connection the application of probiotic remedies to enhance immunological reactivity in poultry is actual.
The aim of the research was to clarify the influence of the drug BPS- 44 and different amounts of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the strain of post-vaccination immunity against Infestiosus bursae disease in broiler chickens. The experiments were performed on broiler-308 inthe farm "Fedyuk M" Zolochiv district, Lviv region. Keeping of chickens were cage with free access to food and water. Technological parameters of broiler (temperature and light conditions) were in compliance with ONTP 2005. The experiment was carried out on 4 groups of broiler chickens,100 ineach scheme: control group fed a standard diet (SD) under the existing rules, recommended for cross ROSS - 308; 1 research group in addition to the SD received probiotic BPS-44 (registration certificate number 2154-04-0254-06 from 24.11.2006 g.), Made on the basis of the production strain of bacteria Bacillus subtilis ssp. subtilis 44-p, a dose of0.21 g/ kg treatment group 2 - 1% yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae; 3 research group chickens - 2% yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Table 1). The 15-day age chickens administrated vaccine against the disease.
For the immunological studies in chickens took blood at different ages: 11-, 27-, 34- and 41-day age. Definition of specific antibodies was performed by ELISA using test systems company Biochek.
The stimulating effect of the drug BPS-44 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast in the composition of feed for broiler chickens on the strength of post-vaccination immunity against Infestiosus bursae disease has been established. This use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast feed consisting largely influence the induction of specific immunity to the virus of Infestiosus bursae disease than drug BPS-44.
References
Avdosyeva, I.K., Chaykovska, O.I., & Rehenchuk, V.V. (2010). Vyvchennya efektyvnosti novoho vitchyznyanoho probiotyka Bionorm P. [The study of new effective domestic probiotic Bionorm P.]. Naukovy vistnyk veterynarnoi medytsyn, Bila Tserkva – Scientific journal of veterinary science, Bila Tserkva, 6 (79), 78–80 [in Ukrainian].
Van den Berg, T.P., Eterradossi, D., Toquin, N., & Meulemans G. (2000). Infectious bursal disease (Gumboro disease). Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 19 (2), 527–543 https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.19.2.1227
Aliyeva, A.K., & Smolenskiy, V.I. (2011). Immunobiologicheskie svoystva zhyvoy vaktsyny protiv bursalnoy bolezni ptits [Immunobiological peculiarities of live vaccine against poultry bursal disease]. Ptitsa i ptitseprodukty – Poultry and poultry products, 4, 16–18 [in Russian].
Birman, B.Ya., & Gromov I.N. (2001). Immunodefitsyty u ptits [Immune deficiencies in birds]. Minsk: Biznesofest [in Russian].
Kovalchuk, Ya.Ya. (2006). Vplyv zgodovuvannya biomasy dridzhiv Saccharomices cerevisiаe na antyoksydantny status porosyan sysuniv [The influence of feeding of biomass of yeast Saccharomices cerevisiаe on antioxidant status of sucking piglets]. Naukovo-tehnichny byuleten Instytutu biologii tvaryn NAAN ta DNDKI vetpreparativ ta kormovyh dobavok – Scientific-technical bulletin of Institute of Animal Biology of UAAS and SCIVP of Veterinary Medical Products and Feed Additives, 1-2, 186–188. [in Ukrainian].
Kotsumbas, I.Ya., Kotsumbas, I.Ya., & Holubiy Ye. (2014). Kompleksna otsinka vplyvu veterynarnykh preparative na morfo funktsionalny stan imunnoi systemy (Metodychni rekomendatsii) [The coplex evaluation of the influence of veterinary drugs on morphological and functional status of immune system (Metodological recomendations)]. “Afisha 11” [in Ukrainian].
Rozhdestvensky, I.K., Terekhanov, A.B., & Khokhlachev, O.F. (1998). Vaktsynoprofilaktika virusnykh bolezney [The vaccine prophylaxis of viral diseases]. Ptitsevodstvo – Poultry farming, 4, 34 [in Russian].
Sikachyna, V.I. (2003). Porivnyalna otsinka rezultativ reaktsii zatrymky hemahlutynatsii (RZHA) ta imunofermentnoho analizu (IFA) pry vyznachenni rivnya antytil proty virusu nukaslskoi khvoroby [The comparative evaluation of results of of hemagglutination inhibition test (HAIT)] and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) under determination ov antibodies level against Newcastle disease]. Veterynarna medytsyna Mizhvidomchy tematychny zbirnyk – Veterinary Medicine. Interdepartmental theatrical digest, Kharkiv, 82, 519–524 [in Ukrainian].
Kotsumbas, I.Ya., Avdosyeva, I.K., & Parchenko, V.V. (2016). Suchasni tendentsii zastosuvannya preparatu “Tryfuzol” 1% v ptakhivnytstvi [The modern trends of utilization of “Tryfuzol” 1% in poultry farming]. Veterynariya – Veterinary medicine,7, 56–58 [in Ukrainian].
Fotina, G.A. (2014). Vyznachennya optymalnoi imunostymuluyuchoi dozy preparatu “Avestym” na broilerakh [Determination of optimal immunestimulating dose of “Avestym” drug in broilers]. Naukovy vistnyk – Scientific Messenger, V.16, 3(60), P.1, 361 – 368 [in Ukrainian].
Alvig, C.R. (2002). Desing and selection of vaccine abjuvants animal models and human trials. Vaccine, 20, 56 – 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00174-3
Smyrnov, V.V., Reznik, S.R., & Vyunitskaya, V.A. (1993). Sovremennye predstavleniya o mekhanizmakh lechebno-profilakticheskogo deystviya probiotikov iz bakteriy roda Bacillus [Modern notions about mechanisms of curative and profilactive action of probiotics of Bacillus bacteria]. Mikrobiologicheskiy zhurnal – Microbiological Journal, V. 55, 4,. 92–112 [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
