Optimize the fermentation process of strawberry must for unfortified wineOptimize the fermentation process of strawberry must for unfortified wine

Authors

  • А. Yu. Tokar Uman National University of Horticulture image/svg+xml
  • I. V. Gayday Uman National University of Horticulture image/svg+xml
  • O. Yu. Yushina Uman National University of Horticulture image/svg+xml
  • O. M. Litovchenko Institute of Horticulture of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine ,
  • V. I. Voitsehivskyi National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2019.02.001

Keywords:

strawberry berries, must, fermentation process, optimization, yeast, unfortified wines.

Abstract

The dynamics of the accumulation of ethyl alcohol in the must from the strawberry varieties of Skolka and Pegas harvested in 2016 and 2017 during the production of unfortified wine materials were investigated. In variants which have accumulated a sufficient volume fraction of ethyl alcohol for the preparation of non-fortified wine, the average content is determined depending on the duration of fermentation. It is advisable to use yeast races EU-1118, ENSIS-LE-5, ENSIS-LE-6 for the production of quality straw-based wines. A graphical representation of the average accumulation of alcohol for its optimal passage has been calculated and constructed. It is determined that the accumulation of ethyl alcohol in strawberry worms (y, %) can be calculated in any period of the process (x, day) by the equation of a quadratic parabola: y = -0,0038x+ 0,4666x + 2,6646, with to an accuracy of 1,5 %. The equation x = 0...90 days is applied. The intensity of the accumulation of ethyl alcohol (% vol.) is derived from the equation. The optimal process flow from 24 to31 days. The volumetric fraction of ethyl alcohol in a must have to be at least 13 %. The criteria for evaluating the fermentation process in a periodic way and taking measures for its regulation can be obtained.

References

Vyrobnykam napoiv daiut zelene svitlo (2018). [Producers of beverages give green light]. Napoi. Tekhnolohii ta Innovatsii [Drinks Technology and Innovation.].3-4 (74-75). 8. Ukraine.

Litovchenko O.M., Tokar A.Yu. (2007). Vynorobstvo iz plodiv ta yahid. [Winemaking from fruits and berries.]. Uman: 430.

Vynoroby Ukrainy zaklykaly vladu vriatuvaty haluz: zvernennia uchasnykiv Pershoho Natsionalnoho vynorobnoho forumu do Prezydenta Ukrainy, Holovy Verkhovnoi Rady ta premier-ministra (2016). [Ukrainian winemakers have called on the authorities to save the industry: the appeal of the participants of the First National Wine Forum to the President of Ukraine, the Speaker of the Supreme Council and the Prime Minister]. Napoi. Tekhnolohii ta Innovatsii [Drinks Technology and Innovation.]. 3 (56). 10-12. Ukraine.

Čakar U., Petrović A., Pejin B., Čakar M., Živković M., Vajs V., Đorđević B. (2019). Fruit as a substrate for a wine: A case study of selected berry and drupe fruit wines // Scientia Horticulturae.244. 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.020

Skrypnyk V.V. (1992). Tekhnolohiia fruktovykh alkoholnykh napoiv. [Fruktany Fruit alcoholic beverage technology]. К.: UAA, 1992. 99.

Scholz-Kulikov E.P. (2009). Vynodelye po-novomu [Winemaking in a new way]. Simferopol: Tavrida. 320.

Nikolaou A., Tsakiris A., Kanellaki M., Bezirtzoglou E., Akrida-Demertzi K., Kourkoutas Y. (2019). Wine production using free and immobilized kefir culture on natural supports // Food Chemistry. 272. 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.015

Wei J., Zhang Y., Yuan Y., Dai L., Yue T. (2019). Characteristic fruit wine production via reciprocal selection of juice and non-Saccharomyces species // Food Microbiology. 79. 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2018.11.008

Samphao A., Butmee P., Saejueng P., Pukahuta C., Švorc Ľ., Kalcher K. (2018). Monitoring of glucose and ethanol during wine fermentation by bienzymatic biosensor // Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 816. 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.03.052

La Roza C. de, Laca A., Garcia L.A., Diaz M. (2002). Taking advantage of temperature changes to determine the progress of cider fermentation // J. Inst. Brewing. 108:1.32-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2002.tb00118.x

Drappier J., Thibon C., Rabot A., Geny-Denis L. (2019). Relationship between wine composition and temperature: Impact on Bordeaux wine typicity in the context of global warming // Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 59: 1, 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1355776

Marin M.R. (1999). Alcoholic fermentation modeling current state and perspectives // Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 50:2.166–178.

Varela J., Varela C. (2019). Microbiological strategies to produce beer and wine with reduced ethanol concentration // Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 56. 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2018.10.003

Skaletska L.F., Podpryatov G.I., Zavadskaya O.V. (2013). Metody doslidzhen roslynnytskoi syrovyny. Laboratornyi praktykum. [Methods of research of plant growing raw materials]. K.: CIT Comprint, 242.

Ieshchenko V.O., Kopytko P.H., Opryshko V.P., Kostohryz P.V. (2005). Osnovy naukovykh doslidzhen v ahronomii. [Fundamentals of scientific research in agronomy]. K.: Diia, 288.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-13

Issue

Section

Biology, biotechnology, ecology