Changes in agrophysical properties of typical type of black type under the influence of fertilizer application and soil treatment

Authors

  • A. A. Tsyuk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • L. V. Tsentilo National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • V. I. Melnik National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2021.05.007

Keywords:

density, porosity, tillage, fertilization system

Abstract

The solution to the problem of increasing the production of agricultural products largely depends on the correct assessment of the level of fertility and cultivation of the soil, a clear understanding of its main indicators optimal for cultivated plants and the use of an effective soil fertility management system on this basis. The goal is to determine the effect of the use of systems of basic tillage and fertilization in grain-tilled crop rotation on changes in soil density in the agrophytocenosis of winter wheat. Methods: The soil density was determined with M. Kachinsky cylinders in the arable layer of 0–10, 10–20, 20–30 sm. The results of stationary studies of the effect of prolonged (2012–2019) application of three options deep coarse-silty-medium loamy in ten-field grain-row crop rotation of the right-bank forest-steppe for its agrophysical indicators. It has been established that the variant of dump-dump-free tillage in the crop rotation creates the best agrophysical conditions for the fertility of typical chernozem. The use of shallow moldboard-free tillage led to a significant increase in soil density (on average by 0,02–0,04 g/sm3) compared to the control. The use of shallow moldboard-free tillage led to a significant decrease in the total porosity by 2,2% in comparison with differentiated and moldboard-free tillage.

References

Dmitriev E. A., Makarov I. B. (1993). O ponyatii «ravnovesnaya plotnost pochv» [About the concept of "equilibrium soil density"]. Pochvovedenie, 8. 94–98.

Kartamyishev N. I., Bardukova I. T., Doronchenko N. V., Vesedin N. V. (1989). Mehanicheskaya obrabotka kak sredstvo regulirovaniya agrofizicheskih svoystv pochvyi [Mechanical processing as a means of regulating the agrophysical properties of the soil]. Zemledelie. 9. 47–49.

Kartashov S. G., Gorodetskiy E. Yu., Dudka V. S., Moskalyuk A. A. (2019). Vpliv optimalnoYi schIlnostI Gruntu dlya rIznih sIlskogospodarskih kultur na vrozhaynIst [Influence of optimal soil density for different crops on yield]. TavrIyskiy naukoviy vIsnik. 78. 21–27.

Lyikov A. M. (1983). Gumus i plodorodie pochvyi. Moskovskiy rabochiy [Humus and soil fertility].193.

Medvedev V. V., Lyindina T. E., Laktionova T. N. (2004). Plotnost slozheniya pochv (geneticheskiy, ekologicheskiy i agronomicheskiy aspektyi [Density of soil (genetic, ecological and agronomic aspects]. Izd-vo «13 tipografiya», 2004. 244.

Ryichkova M. I. (2009). Strukturno-agregatnyiy sostav i plotnost pochvyi v zavisimosti ot sposoba osnovnoy obrabotki i predshestvennika ozimoy pshenitsyi na erozionno-opasnom sklone [Structural-aggregate composition and soil density depending on the method of the main cultivation and the predecessor of winter wheat on an erosion-dangerous slope]. International journal of Humanities and natural Sciences, Vol. II-1 (38). 62–66.

Segin P. M., Begey S. V., Perig G. T., Shuvar I. A.. ta In. (1990). IntensifIkatsIya sIvozmIn promIzhnimi kulturami [Intensification of industrial crops: Recommendations for FPK]: RekomendatsIYi dlya FPK. Lviv: Lviv. SGI, 36.

Teyt R. (1991). Organicheskoe veschestvo pochvyi: biologicheskie i ekologicheskie aspektyi [Soil organic matter: biological and ecological aspects], Mir. 400.

Tsilyurik O. I. (2009). Vpliv sposobIv osnovnogo obrobItku na fIzichnI vlastivostI I vodniy rezhim Gruntu. AgrohImIya I Gruntoznavstvo [Injection of the methods of the main processing on the physical power and water regime of the runtu]: MIzhvIdomchiy tematichniy nauk zbIrnik. HarkIv: Gruntoznavstvo I agrohImIya. 31–36.

Tsyuk O. A. (2006). AgrofIzichnI vlastivostI Gruntu v posIvah buryakIv tsukrovih za ekologIzatsIYi zemlerobstva [Agrophysical power to the soil in the crops of the beetles for the ecology of agriculture]. TsukrovI buryaki. 3. 7–9.

Tsyuk O. A., Kirilyuk V. I. (2016). Vpliv sistem zemlerobstva na zmIni agrofI-zichnih pokaznikIv gruntu [Inflow of farming systems on the ground]. NaukovI dopovIdI NUBIP Ukraini. 4 (61). Rezhim dostupu: http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Dopovidi/article/view/6978

CheryachukIn M. I., Grigor’Eva O. M. (2019). EfektivnIst pryamoYi sIvbi na chornozemI zvichaynomu vazhko suglinkovomu pravoberezhnogo Stepu [The efficiency of direct sowing on chernozem ordinary hard loam right-bank steppe]. Visnik agranoi nauki. 10 (799). 5–11. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201910-01

Shikula M. K., Antonets S. S., AndrIEnko V. O. ta In. (1998). VIdtvorennya rodyuchostI GruntIv u Gruntozahisnomu zemlerobstvI [Reproduction of soil fertility in soil-protective agriculture], Oranta, 680.

Manko Yu.P., Tsyuk O.A., Tsentulo L.V., Shemetun O. (2019). The methodology resource suggesrion with environmental criteria for rationality agricultural systems estimation. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, Vol. 9. (1). 121–126.

Published

2021-10-29

Issue

Section

Agronomy