Features of microclonal propagation of plants of the genus Prunus Serrulata L. for further use in monosaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi4(104).2023.011Keywords:
source material, sakura, selection, varieties, introduction, flowering, classification, morphological featuresAbstract
The article analyses the results of the research and reveals that representatives of the genus Prunus L. should be propagatedvegetatively to preserve their desirable characteristics.It has been found that microclonalpropagation is used for acceleratedreproduction of valuable breeding forms, but this method has not been sufficiently studied for representatives of the genus Prunus L.
It was found that the most effective substance for sterilization when introducing micropropagules with apical meristem into an isolated culture was a 0.1% aqueous solution of mercuric dichloride at an exposure of 1.5-2.0 minutes - 83.7% of sterile and 72.5% of viable explants.The research revealed that the highest yield of viable sterile explants was obtained when they were introduced into in vitro culture in the second and third decades of May and the first decade of June, capable of direct organogenesis, which was, respectively, 69,4%, 76,3% and 58,7%. Therefore, this time of introduction of explants for the genus PrunusL. is the best.When explants were selected and introduced into in vitro culture in the first decade of April, the yield of viable sterile explants was the lowest and amounted to 4.7%, in the second decade of April the yield was higher by 8.6% and amounted to 13.3%. During the introduction of plant material into the culture in the second and third decades of June, the number of viable sterile explants decreased by 21.6-41.9% compared to the introduction in the first decade of June.
The study of the influence of concentrations and combinations of growth regulators on the reproduction ratio of individual members of the genus PrunusL. established that each individual species requires an individual selection of nutrient media. The highest multiplication factor was obtained on the MC-55 medium, which was 6,82 and 6,10 in R. serrulata Royal Burgundy and R. serrulataAmanogawa, respectively.A high multiplication factor of 5,75 and 5,57 was provided by MC-27 and MC-50 media for the cultivation of explants of P. serrulataKanzan and P. serrulataKikuShidare species.
References
KhanI. Md., Ahmad N., Anis M. (2011) The Role of Cytokininson in vitro ShootProduction in SalixtetraspermaRoxb.: a Tree of Ecological Importance. Tree – Structure and Function. Vol. 25, № 4. Pp. 577–584. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-010-0534-6
Read E.P., Bavougian C.M. (2013) In vitro Rejuvenation of WoodySpecies. Protocols for Micropropagation of SelectedEconomically – ImportantHorticulturalPlants. MethodsinMolecularBiology. Vol. 994. Pp. 383–395.
Kalinina A, Brown D.C. (2007)Micropropagation of ornamental Prunus spp. and GF305 peach, a Prunus viralindicator. Plant CellRep. № 26(7). Рр. 927-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-007-0315-x. Epub 2007 Feb 24. PMID: 17323085.
Podhaietskyi A.A., Matskevych V. V., Podhaietskyi A.A. (2018) Osoblyvostimikroklonalnohorozmnozhenniavydivroslyn: monohrafiia [Features of microclonalreproduction of plant species: monograph]. BilaTserkva : BNAU. 209 s.
Kalinina A., Brown D. (2007) Micropropagation of ornamental Prunus spp. and GF305 peach, a Prunus viralindicator. Plant cell reports. № 26. 927-35.
Krens F.A., Jamar D. (1989)The role of explant source and culture conditions on callusinduction and shoot regeneration in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Plant Physiology.Vol. 134, № 6. P. 651–655.
Edwin F. George M. A. (2008) Hall and Geert-Jan DeKlerk. Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. 3rd Edition. Volume 1. The Background. Springer. 503 p.
Kyte L.,KleynJ. G.(1996)Plants from testtubes: an introduction to micropropagation. Portland:TimberPress, 240 p.
Dagla, H.R. (2012)Plant tissue culture. Reson 17. Рp. 759–767.
Opalko A.I. Opalko O.A. (2012)Vykorystanniametodivbiotekhnolohii. Selektsiiaplodovykh i ovochevykhkultur [Use of biotechnology methods. Selection of fruit and vegetable crops]: navch. posib.: Ch. 1.: Zahalniosnovyselektsiihorodnikhroslyn [dliastud. vyshch. navch. zakl.] / zared. A.I. Opalka. Uman: NDP «Sofiivka» NAN Ukrainy. S.201–233.
Steward, F. C., &Mapes, M. O. (1971) Morphogenesis and Plant Propagation in AsepticCultures of Asparagus. Botanical Gazette. № 132(1).Рp. 70–79.
Murashige, T., Skoog, F. (1962) A revisedmedium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobaccotissue culture.Physiology of plant. Vol. 15. № 13. Рр. 473–497.
Sridhar T.M., Naidu C.V. (2011) Effect of different carbonsources on in vitro shootregeneration of Solanumnigrum(Linn.). An important antiulcermedicinal plant. Journal of phytology. Vol.3, №2. P.78–82.
Pevalek-Kozlina B., Jelaska, S. (1987) Microclonalpropagation of Prunus avium L. ActaHortic.№ 212. Рp. 599-602DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1987.212.98
Yi J., Lee G., Chung J., Lee Y., Gwag J., Lee, S. (2015) EfficientMicropropagation of PearGermplasmUsingSootTips and NodalExplants. KoreanJournal of Plant Resources. № 28(6). Рр. 690–696. DOI: 10.7732/KJPR.2015.28.6.690
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).