Analysis of the influence of the main characteristics of nervous processes on the biochemical indicators of the blood of dogs during short-term food deprivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi6(106).2023.017Keywords:
dogs, higher nervous activity, deprivation, metabolism, proteins, fats, carbohydratesAbstract
A significant influence of the type of higher nervous activity on the content of total protein (F = 11.2 > FU = 2.90; Р < 0.001), albumins (F = 14.6 > FU = 2.90; Р < 0.001), globulins ( F = 3.02 > FU = 2.90; P < 0.05), β-globulins (F = 4.07 > FU = 2.90; P < 0.05), γ-globulins (F = 5, 52 > FU = 2.90; P < 0.01), lactate (F = 36.2 > FU = 2.90; P < 0.001) and pyruvate (F = 4.1 > FU = 2.90; P < 0.01), total cholesterol (F = 4.1 > FU = 2.90; P < 0.05) and triacylglycerols (F = 4.9 > FU = 2.90; P < 0.01) in the blood of dogs . Then, as the influence of higher nervous activity on the content of glucose (F = 0.69 < FU = 2.90; p = 0.56) and α-globulins (F = 1.50 < FU = 2.90; p = 0, 24) was not detected in the blood plasma of dogs. Short-term food deprivation also had a significant effect on the content of glucose (F = 18.7 > FU = 4.15; P < 0.001), β-globulins (F = 39.3 > FU = 4.15; P < 0.001), γ- globulins (F = 11.7 > FU = 4.15; P < 0.001), albumins (F = 19.1 > FU = 4.15; P < 0.001), globulins (F = 7.71 > FU = 4, 15; Р < 0.01), lactate (F = 50.0 < FU = 4.15; Р < 0.001), pyruvate (F = 20.7 < FU = 4.15; Р < 0.001), total cholesterol ( F = 5.7 < FU = 4.15; P < 0.05) and triacylglycerols (F = 11.5 < FU = 4.15; P < 0.01) in the blood of dogs. The influence of food deprivation on the content of total protein (F = 0.44 < FU = 4.15; p = 0.28) and α-globulins (F = 0.88 < FU = 4.15; p = 0.36) in the blood of experimental dogs has not been determined. During the entire experiment, no interfactorial interaction between short-term food deprivation and the type of higher nervous activity was established (F = 0.01–1.29 < FU = 2.90; p = 0.29–1.00), which indicates the absence of the influence of deprivation on the type of higher nervous activity of animals.
References
Arden, R., Bensky, M. K., & Adams, M. J. (2016). A review of cognitive abilities in dogs, 1911 through 2016: more individual differences, please! Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(5), 307–312.
Asp, H. E., Fikse, W. F., Nilsson, K., & Strandberg, E. (2015). Breed differences in everyday behaviour of dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 169, 69–77.
Barber, A. L. A., Mills, D. S., Montealegre-Z, F., Ratcliffe, V. F., Guo, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2020). Functional performance of the visual system in dogs and humans: A comparative perspective. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 15, 1–44.
Bensky, M. K., Gosling, S. D., & Sinn, D. L. (2013). The world from a dog’s point of view: a review and synthesis of dog cognition research. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 45, 209–406.
Bray, E. E., Otto, C. M., Udell, M. A. R., Hall, N. J., Johnston, A. M., & MacLean, E. L. (2021). Enhancing the Selection and Performance of Working Dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 644431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.644431
Byosiere, S.-E., Chouinard, P. A., Howell, T. J., & Bennett, P. C. (2018). What do dogs (Canis familiaris) see? A review of vision in dogs and implications for cognition research. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1798–1813.
Casey, R. A., Loftus, B., Bolster, C., Richards, G. J., & Blackwell, E. J. (2014). Human directed aggression in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): Occurrence in different contexts and risk factors. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 152, 52–63.
Christensen, N. J. (1967). Notes on the glucose oxidase method. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 19(4), 379–384.
Cooper, G. R., Henderson, L. O., Smith, S. J., & Hannon, W. H. (1991). Clinical applications and standardization of apolipoprotein measurements in the diagnostic workup of lipid disorders. Clinical Chemistry, 37(5), 619–620.
Davis, A. L., Schwebel, D. C., Morrongiello, B. A., Stewart, J., & Bell, M. (2012). Dog Bite Risk: An Assessment of Child Temperament and Child-Dog Interactions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(8), 3002. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH9083002
Duckett, M. E., Curran, K. M., Leeper, H. J., Ruby, C. E., & Bracha, S. (2021). Fasting reduces the incidence of vincristine-associated adverse events in dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology, 19(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.12638
EI, B. (2022). Fundamentals of Pathophysiology of Higher Nervous Activity - Literature Review. Cytology & Histology International Journal, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.23880/chij-16000137
Fratkin, J. L., Sinn, D. L., Patall, E. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2013). Personality consistency in dogs: a meta-analysis. PloS One, 8(1), e54907.
Friedewald, W. T., Levy, R. I., & Fredrickson, D. S. (1972). Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical Chemistry, 18(6), 499–502.
Hsu, Y., & Sun, L. (2010). Factors associated with aggressive responses in pet dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 123(3–4), 108–123.
Huber, L. (2016). How dogs perceive and understand us. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(5), 339–344.
Khoo, A. W. S., Taylor, S. M., & Owens, T. J. (2019). Successful management and recovery following severe prolonged starvation in a dog. In Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) (Vol. 29, Issue 5, pp. 542–548). https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12878
Kujala, M. V. (2017). Canine emotions as seen through human social cognition. Animal Sentience, 2(14), 1.
Lea, S. E. G., & Osthaus, B. (2018). In what sense are dogs special? Canine cognition in comparative context. Learning & Behavior, 46(4), 335–363.
Netter, P. (2018). Benefits and limitations of drug studies in temperament research: biochemical responses as indicators of temperament. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1744). https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTB.2017.0165
Pointer, E., Reisman, R., Windham, R., & Murray, L. (2013). Starvation and the clinicopathologic abnormalities associated with starved dogs: a review of 152 cases. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 49(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-5762
Rattu, G., Khansili, N., Maurya, V. K., & Krishna, P. M. (2021). Lactate detection sensors for food, clinical and biological applications: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 19, 1135–1152.
Riemer, S., Müller, C., Virányi, Z., Huber, L., & Range, F. (2014). The predictive value of early behavioural assessments in pet dogs–a longitudinal study from neonates to adults. PloS One, 9(7), e101237.
Schupp, H. T., & Renner, B. (2011). Food Deprivation: A neuroscientific perspective BT - Handbook of Behavior, Food and Nutrition (V. R. Preedy, R. R. Watson, & C. R. Martin (eds.); pp. 2239–2257). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_142
Sherman, C. K., Reisner, I. R., Taliaferro, L. A., & Houpt, K. A. (1996). Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of 99 cases of aggression between dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47(1–2), 91–108.
Siniscalchi, M., d’Ingeo, S., Fornelli, S., & Quaranta, A. (2018). Lateralized behavior and cardiac activity of dogs in response to human emotional vocalizations. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 77.
Sundman, A., Johnsson, M., Wright, D., & Jensen, P. (2016). Similar recent selection criteria associated with different behavioural effects in two dog breeds. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 15(8), 750–756.
Tonoike, A., Otaki, K.-I., Terauchi, G., Ogawa, M., Katayama, M., Sakata, H., Miyasako, F., Mogi, K., Kikusui, T., & Nagasawa, M. (2022). Identification of genes associated with human-canine communication in canine evolution. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 6950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11130-x
van den Berg, S. M., Heuven, H. C. M., van den Berg, L., Duffy, D. L., & Serpell, J. A. (2010). Evaluation of the C-BARQ as a measure of stranger-directed aggression in three common dog breeds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 124(3–4), 136–141.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).