Using test objects in the disinfection system when fighting agents of campylobacteriosis

Authors

  • N. A. Pustovit State Scientific Control Institute of Biotechnology and strains , Державного науково-контрольного інституту біотехнології і штамів мікроорганізмів
  • N. G. Pinchuk State Scientific Control Institute of Biotechnology and strains , Державного науково-контрольного інституту біотехнології і штамів мікроорганізмів

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2019.02.021

Keywords:

campylobacteriosis, material, disinfectant, test - objects, isolate

Abstract

Dietary toxic infections occur everywhere, which is due to the widespread spread of these pathogens in the environment. The highest morbidity is observed in economically developed countries of the world.

Campylobacteriosis is characterized by polymorphism of clinical manifestations of infection. The most common form of infection is enterocolitis. Systemic lesions may also occur (septicemia, meningitis, cardiovascular disorders such as: thrombophlebitis, myocarditis, endocarditis, kidney and urinary tract, liver and gallbladder, nervous system: paresis, paralysis, polyneuritis, musculoskeletal system: arthritis , synovitis, bursitis) and neonatal pathology (septic abortions and preterm labor, accompanied by the development of septicemia, meningitis and enteritis in newborns).

A person under certain conditions (sick, reconvalescent) can be a source of infection, especially for people with immunodeficiency states and infants. The household route of transmission is realized in direct contact with animals (birds, especially chickens), in which often asymptomatic carriers of the pathogen are observed. The cases of transmission of the pathogen by contact-to-home means among family members or in specialized closed medical institutions are described, which is explained by the low infectious dose of the pathogen.

Due to the growing recognition that Campylobacter is an important intestinal pathogen in humans, the influence of widely used disinfectants on the sensitivity of isolates of this pathogen was studied.

A number of disinfectants are used to disinfect, but most of them have a narrow spectrum of bactericidal properties and are highly toxic.

         The purpose of the work was the use of the method of test objects in the disinfection system in the fight against the causative agents of campylobacteriosis. poultry.

Materials and methods. An assessment of the effectiveness of disinfectants was carried out in accordance with P 4.2. 2643 -10 "Methods of laboratory research and testing of medical prophylactic disinfectants for assessing their effectiveness and safety.

Results of the research. The bactericidal activity was determined by the method using test objects. Working solutions of disinfectants were prepared ex tempore by mixing the appropriate quantities of disinfectants and sterile drinking water.

An analysis of the results of the studies presented indicates the ineffectiveness of using ultraviolet as an independent means of disinfecting surfaces of different types in exposures of 20 minutes and 2:00, which may be due to the "blind zones" of the room and the bacteriostatic effect of formalin with exposure 24-48 hours.

Conclusions and prospects for further research. So we can say that the use of ultraviolet as an independent means of disinfecting surfaces of various types contaminated by bacteria for exposures of 20 minutes and 2 hours ineffective is ineffective. In the long term, it is necessary to comprehensively approach the system of disinfection and adherence to sanitary-and-epidemiological rules in the fight against pathogens of food toxicoinfections.

References

Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from animals, foods, and humans in Spain in 1997–1998 / Y. Saenz et al.: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000. Vol. 44. P. 267–271. [in English] https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.2.267-271.2000

Profylaktyka kampylobakteryoza sredy liudei: Sanytarno-epydemyolohycheskye pravyla SP 3.1.7. 2816 10. M.: postanovlenyem Glavnoho hosudarstvennoho sanytarnoho vracha Rossyiskoi Federatsyy. 2010. 125 s. [in Russia]

Prevalence and numbers of Campylobacter on broiler carcasses collected at rehang and postchill in 20 U.S. processing plants / M. E. Berrang et al.: Journal of Food Protection. 2007. Vol. 70. P. 1556-1560. [in English] https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-70.7.1556

Kovalenko V. L. Aktualni problemy zastosuvannia dezinfikuiuchykh preparativ : Veterynarna biotekhnolohiia. K., 2008. № 12. S. 78 – 90. . [in Ukrainian]

The genome sequence of the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences / J. Parkhill, B.W. et al.: Nature. 2000. Vol. 403. P. 668. [in English] https://doi.org/10.1038/35001088

Campylobacter and Arcobacter / P. R. Murray et al.: Manual of clinical microbiology. Washington, DC : American Society for Microbiology. 1995. P. 483–91. [in English]

Detection of Campylobacter jejuni in dairy farm environmental samples using SYBR green real-time polymerase chain reaction / Nam H.M. et al.: Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2005. Vol. 2, N 2. P. 160–168. [in English] https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2005.2.160

Metodu laboratornukh ysledovanyi y ysputanyi medyko-profylaktycheskykh dezynfektsyonnukh sredstv dlia otsenky yh effektyvnosty y bezopasnosty: Rukovodstvo R 4.2. 2643 – 10. – M.: Federalnaia sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchytu prav potrebytelei y blahopoluchyia cheloveka. 2009. S. 118–120. [in Russia]

Published

2019-04-26

Issue

Section

Veterinary medicine, quality and safety of livestock products