The removal and balance of nutrients in crop rotation chain under different fertilization systems

Authors

  • R.V. Ivanina Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of NAAS , Інститут біоенергетичних культур і цукрових буряків НААН

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2019.06.011

Keywords:

nutrients, balance, fertilizers, crop rotation chain

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to study the peculiarities of the use and balance of nutrients in cereal rotation chains under different fertilizer systems. Field, laboratory and analytical methods were used during the research. At the fertilizers dose of N20P20K20 per 1 ha of cereal rotation chains, a sharp shortage of nutrients was formed: in the chain barley-clover-winter wheat intensity of nitrogen balance was 62%, phosphorus – 45%, potassium – 21%; barley-spring vetch-winter wheat – 46%, 55% and 26%, respectively. The formation of an environmentally sound balance of nutrients required in both rotation chains to increase the dose of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers – more than twice, potassium – in 3-4 times. On the fond of crop rotation fertilization N43P43K43 + 8.3 tons of manure per 1 ha of crop rotation, these doses of mineral fertilizers in the cereal chains were determined to be ecologically balanced as those forming a positive balance of nitrogen and phosphorus with a slight deficit of potassium at the intensity of its balance of 77-95%. The high crop rotation fertilizer background offset the acute shortage of fertilizers in the cereal rotation chains. Ecologically stable by nitrogen and phosphorus it was defined alternate fond of crop rotation fertilization with application per 1 ha N43P43K43 + by-products: intensity of nitrogen balance – 111%, phosphorus – 104%, potassium – 63%. Further studies on monitoring the balance of nutrients in crop rotations, taking into account different sources of their admission to the plants, features of fertilizer application and distribution, are the basis for the development of an environmentally balanced and efficient system of crops fertilization.

Author Biography

  • R.V. Ivanina, Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of NAAS, Інститут біоенергетичних культур і цукрових буряків НААН
    аспірант

References

Zaryshniak A.S., Balyuk S.A., Lisovyi M.V., Komarista A.V. (2012). Balanc humusu i pozhynykh rechovyn v gruntakh Ukrainy [Balance of humus and nutrients in soils of Ukraine]. Bulletin of agrarian science, 1, 28-32. [in Ukrainian].

Lukowiak R., Grzebisz W., SassenrathG.F. (2016). New insights into phosphorus management in agriculture - A crop rotation approach. Science of The Total Environment, V. 542, 15, 1062-1077.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.009

Liu Y., Ma J., He W., Lei Q., Gao Q., He P. (2017). Temporal and spatial variation of potassium balance in agricultural land at national and regional levels in China. PLoS One, 12(9), 1-17.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184156

Saiko V.F. (2008). Naukovi osnovy zemlerobstva v kointeksti zmin klimatu [The scientific basis of agriculture in the context of climate change]. Bulletin of agrarian science, 11, 5-10. [in Ukrainian].

Blesh J., Drinkwater L. E. (2013). The impact of nitrogen source and crop rotation on nitrogen mass balances in the Mississippi River Basin. Ecological society of America, V.23, 5, 1017-1035.

https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0132.1

Sassenrath G.F., Schneider J.M., Gaj R., Grzebisz W., Halloran J.M. (2013). Nitrogen balance as an indicator of environmental impact: toward sustainable agricultural production. Agric. Food Syst, 28, 276-289.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170512000166

Venkatesh M.S., Hazra K.K., Ghosh P.K., Khuswah B.L., Ganeshamurthy A.N., Ali M., Singh J. & Mathur R.S. (2017). Long-term effect of crop rotation and nutrient management on soil-plant nutrient cycling and nutrient budgeting in Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, V.63, 14, 2007- 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1320392

Berge M., Pikula D., Goedhart P.W., Schröder J.J. (2016). Apparent nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of grass-clover leys and farmyard manure in an arable rotations. Soil Use Manage, 32, 9-19.

https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12246

Bender S.F., Wagg C., and van der Heijden M.G. (2016). An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends Ecol. Evol, 31, 440-452.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.016

Petrovic B., Đuric S., Vasic M., Tunguz V., Pokluda R. (2018). Effect of Bean Cultivars on Soil Microorganisms. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(1), 0155-0160.

https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201866010155

Mandic V., Krnjaja v., Tomic Z., Bijelic Z, Simic A., Muslic D., Gogic M. (2015). Nitrogen fertilizer influence on wheat yield and use efficiency under different environmental conditions. Chilean journal of agricultural research, 75(1), 92-97.

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392015000100013

Karpus M.M., Slavov V.P., Lapa M.A. (1995). Detalizovana pozhyvnist kormiv zony Lisostepu Ukrainy [Detail nutrition of feed at the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine]. Kiev: Agrarian Science, 348. [in Ukrainian].

Published

2019-12-28

Issue

Section

Agronomy