The cognitive component of communicative roles in institutional dialogue

Authors

  • T A Pasternak ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog0(272).2017.030%20-%2037

Abstract

Communicative roles in the institutional dialogue are the carriers of cognitive information about the situation and its participants. The article explores and classifies communicative roles performed in the institutional dialogue. The aim of the study is to consider the cognitive component of communicative roles in the interviews for employment. Taking into account the specificity of the institutional dialogue, the cognitive component is considered in terms of role realization within status, status-categorical, categorical and positional communicative roles. Each category includes role-specific set of categorically related actions and characteristics associated with the actions and motives of the subjects featured member categories, including scenarios of communicative behavior. There are conventional expectations about standard actions of participants in a specific situation within definite institutional roles. However, unconventional scenarios of communicative behavior are considered a communication failure and require explanation contained in the communicators’ speech steps, steering the direction of further discussion.

References

Karasik, V. I. (2002) Yazyk sotsialnoho statusa: Sotsiolingvisticheskiy aspect. Pragmalingvisticheskiy aspect. Lingvisticheskiy aspect [The language of social status. Sociolinguistic aspect. Pragmalinguistic aspect. Linguistic aspect]. Moscow: Hnosis. 333.

Kravchenko, A. I. (1999) Sotsiolohiia [Sociology]. Moscow: Logos. 86-109.

Krysin, L. P. (1977) Rechevoe obschenie y sotsialnye roli govoryaschih. Sotsialno-lingvisticheskoe issledovanie [Communication and social roles of speakers. Social and linguistic research]. Moscow: Nauka, 42-51.

Kravchenko, N. K. (2017) Dyskurs y dyskurs-analiz: kratkaya entsyklopediia [Discourse and discourse analysis: brief encyclopedia] Kyev: Interservys, 286.

Kravchenko, N. K., Pasternak, T. A. (2016) Metodyka issledovaniya razhovornoho diskursa v rakurse teorii relevantnostiy (inferentsionno-prahmaticheskaya model) [Research methods of colloquial discourse in terms of relevance theory (inferential-pragmatic model)]. Odeskyi linhvistychnyy visnyk. Vyp. 8. Odesa, 40-43.

Pasternak, T. A. (2017) Pragmatyka instytutsiinoho dyskursu “spivbesida”: lingvokomunikatyvnyi aspekt. Monografiia [Pragmatics of institutional discourse “job interview”: linguo-communicative aspect. Monograph] Kyiv: Interservis, 206.

Selivanova, E. A. (2002) Osnovy lingvisticheskoi teorii teksta y comunikatsii [The basics of linguistic theory of text and communication]. Kiev: Fitosotsiotsentr, 336.

Kharchenko, S. V. (2015) Zasoby vyrazhennia sponukannia v ukrainskii literaturnii movi: semantyko-syntaksychnyi i komunikatyvnyi aspekty [Means of expressing imperative in the Ukrainian literary language: semantic-syntactic and communicative aspects:] : monografiia, Kyiv : Milenium, 210

Shynkaruk, V.D.,. Popovich N.M (2011) Cyntaksychna struktura rechen z chyslivnykovym komponentom v ukrainskii movi: monohrafiia [The syntactic structure of sentences with a numeric component in the Ukrainian language]: monografiia - Chernivtsi: Chernivtsi National Unt., 2011,136.

Fairclough, Norman. (2004) Analysing Discourse. London: Routledge.

Goffman, E. (1979) The neglected situation. Language in social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 61-66.

Heritage, John. (1997) Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data, ed. Silverman D. Quantitative research: theory, method and practice. London: Sage, 161-182.

Role theory: concepts and research. (1979) Eds. Biddle B. J. & Thomas E. J. Huntington (N.J.): Krieger.

Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. NY: Irvington Press, 15-21.

Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on conversation. 2 vol. Ed. Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Walker, Stephen. (1979) National role conceptions and systemic outcomes. Psychological models in international politics. Ed. Falkowski L. Boulder. CO: Westview Press, 169-210

Downloads

Issue

No. 272 (2017): Scientific Herald of National University of Life And Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Section

Статті

License

Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons  Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).