Structural-Semantic Features Of German And English Enviromental Term System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog0(257).2016.0236%20-%20240Abstract
Today a modern linguistics has a strong interest in the formation of vocabulary, because it is constantly enriched with new lexical units in connection with globalization, the development of international contacts and so on.
Problems of word formation researched such famous linguists as M.Y.Plyusch, O.S.Kubryakova, H.O.Vynokur, Y.A.Zatsnyy and others. From the perspective of cognitive linguistics, word formation takes an important role because he completely focused on communication, the transfer of knowledge about the world. O.S.Kubryakova notes derived words, unlike ordinary call not only an action, object, but also point to the relationship, their relationship to other action items. In this way it becomes possible to connect new experiences with the old, to know the unknown through the known.
The relevance the study caused by the presence of growing interest in the study of linguistic features of environmental themes and terminology of translation.
The goal of this study is to determine the main ways of creating terminology system of ecology in comparative aspect of the English, German and Ukrainian languages. The terms, as a sign of unity, can be considered in three ways: in terms of form and structural features (syntax), meaning (semantic) and the characteristics of their use (pragmatic). Term – emotionally neutral word or phrase that is used for the exact expression of concepts and names of objects. Structural features of of terms from the perspective of formal organization are quite great significance for understanding. The more complex structural model terms and operate a particular system, the more difficult is the process of decoding terminological units. Analysis of existing forms of terms can also install the most productive methods and models of their formation, which allows the prediction of further development of the system. The environmental terms represented by the following structural types: simple terms, derived terms, complex terms, terminology connections, reduction. A simple term is essential, based on unchanged and includes important meaning. Derivative term – a term which may isolate motivational base and derivational affixes. The original term contains in its composition one root and one (or more) affixed morpheme. There are three models of the formation of derivatives of terms: prefixal, suffixal, prefixes-suffixal. In affixed method of formation of terminological vocabulary to describe new objects, phenomena and concepts is used word formation.
Word formation considered as a means nomination as a means of replenishment vocabulary with new words to describe the emerging phenomena of culture and civilization or its renewal through new means of expression. Under the rules of word formation to understand the creation of linguistic units on certain models and diagrams, system methods and means of creating new words. Word created a certain amount of relationship of its components (roots, affixes) and the ratio of single words - a member of word-formation system - another word of the same system.
Today among linguists disagree about the nature of terminological expressions. Several scientists relates them to the phraseology. KJ Averbukh gives the following definition of terminological phrases, grammatical and a semantic association of two or more full-blown words that are used to name specific professional concept
The main properties terminological expressions are semantic integrity and stability. The German environmental terminology abbreviations distinguish initial, hybrid formation, acronyms, contamination reduction. The most productive way is to contamination.
So, in the German-speaking and English-speaking discourses meet environmental terms established prefixal, suffixal, prefixes-suffixal ways. The most productive type of terminology is for the German two-component complex terms. Abbreviated terms are a special type of environmental terms which are widely spread through the development of scientific and technological progress. The most productive type for both German and English is abbreviation – contamination.
References
Averbuh, K. Ya. (2004) Obshchaya teoriya termina [The General theory of the term]. Ivanovo, 252.
Aivazovi, N. M. (2012) Formuvannia ukrainomovnoyi terminosystemy «promyslova Ekologiya» (lingvokognityvni zasady) [The formation of Ukrainian system of terms «industrial Ecology» (linguistic and cognitive foundations)]. Problems of Ukrainian system of terms: collection of scientific papers, 58-61.
Bagmut, Y. A. (2005) Problemy perekladu suspilno-politychnoyi literatury ukrayinskoyu movoyu [Problems of translation of social and political literature into the Ukrainian language]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 58.
Ivanova, N. A. (2010) Slovotvirnyi potentsial anglomovnykh leksychnykh innovatsiy sfery ekologiyi ta problem yikh perekladu ukrayinskoyu movoyu [Tekst] [Derivational potential of English lexical innovations in the sphere of ecology and the problems of their translation into the Ukrainian language [Text]]. Philological treatises, B.2, №1, 121-127.
Kyyak, T. R. Zapozychennia ta internatsionalizmy u fakhovych movakh [Borrowings and internationalisms in the professional languages]. [Internet resource]. Access mode: http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/ 1068/1/06ktpifm.pdf.
Kiyak, T. R. (1989) Lingvisticheskiye aspekty terminovedeniya [Linguistic aspects of terminology]. Kyiv: UMK VO, 104.
Kubryakova, E. S. (1990) Slovoobrazovanie [Word formation] // Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: Soviet encyclopedia, 331.
Medetova, M. E. (1989) Inoyazychnyye zaimstvovaniya v russkom yazyke (na material terminologii sportivnykh igr) [Foreign borrowings in the Russian language (on the material of the terminology of sports games)]. Comparative study of languages and interference, Alma-Ata, 84-89.
Rytikova, L. L. (2008) Osoblyvosti formuvannia biotechnologichnoyi terminologiyi angliyskoyi movy [Features of the formation of the biotechnological terminology of the English language]. Agricultural science and education. B.9. №3-4, 122-126.
Rudenko, N. S. (2011) Ekologichna leksyka yak obyekt perekladu: teoretychnyi ta metodologichnyy aspekty [Environmental lexicon as an object of translation: theoretical and methodological aspects]. Gazette of LNU of Taras Shevchenko, №16(227), P.I, 56-60.
Salamakha, M. Ya. (2013) Antonimiya u paradyhmatychnykh vidnoshenniyakh anhlomovnoyi terminologiyi sfery okhorony dovkillya [Antonimics in paradigmatic relations of English terminology in the sphere of environmental protection]. Gazette of Zhytomyr state university of Ivan Franko, Is.28, 220-223.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).