Scientific worldview as an integrated model of the world cognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog0(292).2018.0202-208Abstract
The given article is devoted to the research of the scientific worldview as an integrated model of the world cognition which unites and systemizes different fields, namely scientific, technical and humanitarian ones. The purpose and the task of the article are to study the processes of scientific knowledge reintegration in different fields, the ways of special names introduction for technique as a result of the meaning reinterpretation of terms in other scientific fields. The analytical and descriptive method is used in the research to study every terminological unite in its semantic and structural aspects. The methods of definitive analyses are used to generalize and classify lingual facts, study of Ukrainian terms subject-matter plan, and precise their semantic structure.
A review of scientific works is presented. It is found out that the scientific worldview is considered as a rational model of the world cognition formed by means of connection of certain phenomena into the whole in the process of the development of the science; it also gives the overall picture of the Universe and forms universal scientific knowledge. The general scientific worldview contains the idea of both the development of insentient substance and the biological and social revolution, that is, knowledge of various branches is integrated and intersected in the process of scientific knowledge, as well as in search of successful names of new concepts, and existing terms serve as the basis to name specific concepts in completely different fields.
Scientific worldview is considered as a research program which defines the strategy of scientific cognition, and also provides the objectivization of scientific knowledge – its relation with the object researched and the incorporation in a correspondent culture. A special role in the research process belongs to the heuristic function of the scientific worldview, which acts as an algorithm that directs the formation of empirical facts.
One of the ways of new scientific knowledge formation and, accordingly new terms, is researched: it is the scientific knowledge reintegration in different fields. As the consequence special technical names emerge in the result of a metaphorical reinterpretation of the meanings of the terms of distant and close scientific fields. The essence of metaphorical reinterpretation lies in the establishment of a new content of knowledge, which is achieved by conditional identification of the semantic fields of various specific scientific worldviews. In particular, technical terms swivel, diaphragm, pulp, fibers are formed by means of metaphorizing the special names of anatomy. Such technical terms as photosynthesis (botany), thermoregulation (physiology), virus (bacteriology), panel (geodesy), cyclone (meteorology), inhibition (chemistry), which have both general (thermoregulation, cyclone) and sector-specific (photosynthesis, virus, panel) features are formed by means of specific vocabulary of other scientific fields. Specific terms of technique can emerge as a result of reterminologisation of humanity science terms, in particular linguistics and mythology (metaphor, daemons).
A complex process of metaphorisation which defines the inner development of lexical and semantic development is analyzed. The formation of technical terms is accompanied by semantic modifications, as well as by the changes of denotative and syllogistic correlation of original and derivative meanings. In a semantic structure, the meaning of the original term in the process of metaphorical reinterpretation is actualized and differential semes become motivating, or, vice versa, implicit seme motivator in the structure of the initial meaning can become differentiated in the structure of the derivative meaning. When creating technical terms, the process of lexical-semantic structures changing of the original terms occur; in particular, there is the transition from abstract to specific and, accordingly, there is the formation of a specific logical meaning structure. In some cases, one can also see the opposite process - the transition from a specific meaning to an abstract one by means of the denotative seme annihilation and the formation of an abstract and logical structure. For example, the terms photosynthesis, thermoregulation, inhibition in both the fields of science, and in technique denote processes, and therefore they express abstract concepts, so the term panel in the field of geodesy and technology denotes a specific concept. The interference from abstract to specific and, consequently, the formation of a specific logical structure, has occurred in the process of metaphorizing of the term cyclone, which in meteorology means "edding motion of the atmosphere with a decrease in air pressure from the periphery to the center of the vertiginous current...", and in the technique it is "a device for air purification". The process of interference from specific to abstract can be demonstrated in such an example: the virus is "1. Bacterium, noe of the smallest microorganisms causing infectious disease. " 2. A program that can join other computer programs and cause crashes in their work. "
Newly-formed names express either sector-specific or general technical terms, which are used in many technical sub-sectors. In some cases, the term has several general technical meanings and one sector-specific (diaphragm). The reason for metaphorization is the similarity of features or functions of comparable concepts.
Features on the basis of which the metaphor interference occurs are characterized. The functional similarity metaphor is the most common as the principle of action is the main category of technique. The metaphor which is based on the similarity of outer appearance and features of the objects compared is also common. It has several factors: functional and outer likeness, and outer likeness and a feature.
It is proved that the terms of technique are formed as a result of reinterpretation of the special names of other scientific spheres of human activity, that is, the re-integration of the terms of different, sometimes quite remote, spheres occur. Scientific metaphor in the process of reinterpretation of the original term acts as a model, serves as a guide in finding a successful name, brings together remote scientific fields, thereby demonstrating the consistancy, integrality, and integrity of the scientific worldview.
References
Vernadskij, V. I. (1981). Izbrannye trudy po istorii nauki [Selecta of Scientific History]. Moskva, 360.
Vynnyk, O. P. (2007). Metaforychni protsesy u formuvanni ukrainskoi ekonomichnoi leksyky [Metaphor Processes in the Formation of Ukrainian Economic Vocabulary]. Kharkiv, 20.
Ehynshteyn, A. (1967). Vliyanie Maksvella na razvitie predstavleniy o fizicheskoy realʹnosti [The Influence of Maxwell on the Development of Ideas about Physical Reality] / Science work collection in 4 V. V. 4: Articles, Reviews, Letters. Evolution of Physics. Moscow, 1967. P. 136–139.
Lebedev, S. A. (2006). Filosofiya nauki: slovarʹ osnovnykh terminov: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov [The Philosophy of Science: Dictionnary of Basic Terms: university level study guide]. Moskva, 320.
Malevych, L. D. Metafora v naukovii kartyni svitu [Metaphor in the Scientific Worlview] (2003). Ukrainian Terminology and Modernity. 2003. N. 5. P. 224—227.
Pan’ko, T. I., Kochan, I. M., Matsiuk, H. P. (1994). Ukrainske terminoznavstvo [Ukrainin Terminology]. Lviv: Svit, 216.
Petrova, T. O. Shliakhy formuvannia suchasnoi ukrainskoi fitomelioratyvnoi terminolohii: terminolohizuvannia zahalnovzhyvanoi leksyky y reterminolohizuvannia leksyky inshykh nauk [The Ways of Contemporary Ukrainian Philomelioration Terminology Formation] (2017). Terminology of General Vocabulary and Reterminology of the Vocabulary of others Scientific Fields. Bulletin of National University “Lviv Polytechnics” 2017. № 869: Problems of Ukrainian Terminology. P. 77—82.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).