Portuguese for Audit and Accounting: Variability in the Monomial Structure

Authors

  • O I Chaika ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2021.02.084

Abstract

Abstract. The paper considers Portuguese for Audit and Accounting as a specific domain of knowledge and studies the terminological expressions, or terminological collocations, subject to Chernovaty’s classification of terms, or according to Chaika (2019, 2020), linguistic monomials as set term clusters in relevant terminologies, or languages for specific purposes (LSP). In order to demonstrate the application of methodology, this time it is Portuguese for Audit and Accounting, which serves to meet the objectives of the current study. The paper aims to reveal certain approaches to analyse the structure of the monomial in linguistics. Such approaches vary from the structural analysis of  the set term cluster (monomial) by the number of components / elements in the structure, morphological class of the head term in the monomial structure, to their role in a sentence under a professional setting, as well as syntactic patterns as basic units of syntax, which are logically, grammatically, and semantically arranged. The result is unique inseparable conceptual (semantic) value of such monomials in Portuguese for Audit and Accounting.  The list of approaches to study and analysis of the designated field and the respective material is not exhaustive. The examples of monomials in Portuguese for Audit and Accounting are selected from the Glossary of Terms, the Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements validated by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). It is revealed that distinct similarities identified in the course of work with Portuguese for Audit and Accounting may take to relevant classifications attributable with the same set of criteria for the Ukrainian, English, German, Spanish languages as representatives of the Slavic, Germanic, and Romance families.  The further prospect lies in performing comparative and contrastive analyses of the mentioned language material in respective LSP corpora.

References

Alber-Dewolf, R. (1980) "Compte rendu de Hoffman L., Languages for Special Purposes as a Means of Communication: An lntroducntion", p. 31.

Aronoff, M., Rees-Miller, J. (2017). The Handbook of Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119072256

Cabré, M. T. (2002). Terminología y lingüística: la teoría de las puertas abiertas. Estudios de Lingüística del Español (ELiEs). Red Iris (España: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona).

Chaika, O. (2015). Identity in Cross-Linguistic Legal Syntax. Proceedings of the MtS conference (University of Prešov).

Chaika, O. (2019). Binomials in English Audit Terminology. International Journal of Philology. Kyiv : «MIlenium». Vol. 10, no 3, pp. 68-73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/philolog2019.03.068

https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2019.03.068

Chaika, O. (2020). Structure of Simplified Monomials in Ukrainian for Audit and Accounting. In: Scientific journal. «International Journal of Philology». Kyiv : «Milenium». Vol. 11. No. 4. P.108-112.

Chaika (Čajka), O. (2020). Structure of Bi-Term Monomials in English for Audit and Accounting. In: Euromentor Journal. Volume XI, No. 4. P. 158-174. URL: http://euromentor.ucdc.ro/EUROMENTOR december2020.pdf

Chaika, O. (2020). Monomials as Set Term Clusters in Terminologies. In: Scientific journal. «International Journal of Philology». Kyiv: «Milenium», Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 96 -99.

https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.03.016

http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Filol/article/view/14649

Chaika, O. (2021). Nounal Simplified Monomials in Ukrainian for Audit and Accounting. In: International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, Vol. 4 (2). ISSN (print): 2644-0679, ISSN (online): 2644-0695. P. 578-583.

Darchuk, N. (2019). Compiling of the Electronic Dictionary of Models of the Ukrainian Language Multicomponent Complex Sentences. Ukrajinske Movoznavstvo (Ukrainian Languistics), no 1 (49), p. 117-129. https//doi.org/ 10.17721/um/49(2019).117-129.

https://doi.org/10.17721/um/49(2019).117-129

L'Homme, M.-C. (2015). Terminologies and Taxonomies. In: The Oxford Handbook of the Word / Ed. by John R Taylor. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.013.008.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.013.008

Khan, S. A. (2016) The Distinction between Term and Word: A Translator and Interpreter Problem and the Role of Teaching Terminology. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences. International Conference on Teaching and Learning English as an Additional Language, GlobELT 2016, 14-17 April 2016, Antalya, Turkey.

Luchyk, A. (2016). Dynamika movnoyi normy i problemy kodyfikatsiyi [Dynamics of language norm and codification problem]. Magisterium (mov), 62 (12), 51-55.

Pearson, J. (1998). Term in Context. John Benjamin Publishing.

Rondeau, G. (1984). Introduction à la terminologie (Introduction to terminology). Quebec, CA: Gaetan Morin Editeur 2nd ed. 1984. 238 p., ISBN 2-89105-137-8.

Sager, J. (1990). A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1990. xi + 254pp. ISBN 90 272 20778(pb).

https://doi.org/10.1075/z.44

Shynkaruk, V. (2002). Katehoriyi modusu i dyktumu u strukturi rechennya: Monohrafiya [Categories of mode and dictum in the sentence structure]. Chernivtsi: Ruta.

Soare, R. I. (2011). Computability Theory and Applications: The Art of Classical Computability.

Sonneveld, H, Loenning, K. (1994). Introducing terminology. Terminology, p. 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1075/term.1.1.01loe

Wüster, E. (1979). Einführung in die allgemeine Terminologielehre und terminologische Lexikographie. Teil 1-2. Springer-Verlag.

International Audit and Assurance Standards, Volume I published by the IAASB - International Audit and Assurance Standards Board. = IAASB as referred to in the publication.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-09