Visual metaphors in advertising: A cognitive-pragmatic interface
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog15(2).2024.03Abstract
The article focuses on the analysis of the visual metaphors in advertising from a cognitive-pragmatic perspective using the method of conceptual blending theory, tools of inferential pragmatics, and visual design grammar. The aim of the article is to identify the cognitive-pragmatic interface of visual metaphor presented in commercial advertising of modern transnational brands from the point of view of metaphorical explicatures, implicatures in their connection with the stages and procedures of reconstructing the metaphorical meaning.
It is found that visual metaphors are represented by three main types – juxtaposition, fusion, and replacement, which differ in the level of their explicitness depending on the representation of the source and target of the metaphor in the visual plane of advertising, their merging into one gestalt, or the absence of visualization of input spaces. In metaphors of juxtaposition and fusion types, the restoration and/or detailing of the source and target are carried out at the level of explicatures, establishing a connection between the presented objects. At the implicature level, information about the product characteristics, which are the goal of specific visual advertising, is restored, forming secondary signified – connotations (power, fantasy, stability) intended to create stable associations with the brand and its products. In the case of replacement, implicatures restore both the source and the target spaces, as well as the secondary signified.
In all types of metaphors, implicature about the secondary signified is triggered by a violation of the maxim of quality of information through visual metaphorical means, combined with deviations from other maxims as the metaphor becomes more complex. The implicature is restored in the blend of the metaphor as a result of selecting attributes of the generic space with their refinement as the blend develops and elaborates, relying on verbal anchors and background information about the brand and its products.
References
Arts, J. & Schilperoord, J. (2016). Visual optimal innovation. In C. Fernandes (Ed.). Multimodality and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 61-80.
Barthes, R. (1973). Mythologies. London: Paladin, 164 p.
Bünzli, F & Dillard, J.P. (2022). The persuasive effects of verbal anchoring and visual complexity. Journal of Visual Literacy, 41 (1), 46-64.
El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2 (1), 75-95.
Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books, 464 p.
Feng, D., & Wu, X. (2022). Coronavirus, demons, and war: Visual and multimodal metaphor in Chinese public service advertisements. SAGE Open, 12(1). 1-13.
Forceville, Ch. (2020). Visual and Multimodal Communication: Applying the Relevance Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 320 p.
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 470 p.
Fredriksson, A. & Pelger, S. (2020). Conceptual Blending Monitoring Students’ Use of Metaphorical Concepts to Further the Learning of Science. Research in Science Education, 50, 917–940.
Giora, R., Givoni, S., Heruti, V., & Fein, O. (2017). The role of defaultness in affecting pleasure: The optimal innovation hypothesis revisited. Metaphor and Symbol, 32 (1), 1-18.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics, 3, 41–58.
Grice, H. P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In: P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (Ed.) Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 183-198.
Jeong, S. (2008). Visual metaphor in advertising: Is the persuasive effect attributable to visual argumentation or metaphorical rhetoric? Journal of Marketing Communications, 14 (1), 59-73.
Kravchenko, N., Zhykharieva, O., Letunovska, I. (2024). Semiotics of Harley-Davidson advertising through stylistics and pragmatics: the concept of freedom in constructing target consumer identity. Revista Univap, 30 (65), 1-15.
Kravchenko, N., Zhykharieva, O. (2023). Visual metaphor in advertising discourse: the problem of interaction of the approaches of conceptual blending, visual grammar and the theory of relevance. Philological education and science: transformation and modern development vectors: Scientific monograph. Riga, Latvia: «Baltija Publishing», p. 238-258.
Kravchenko, N., Shanaieva-Tsymbal, L. (2023). Multimodal Ukrainian Brand Narrative: Semiotics, Structure, Archetypes. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology, 2 (26/2), 27-44.
Kravchenko, N., Yudenko, O. (2023). Multimodal Advertising: Semiotic and Cognitive-Pragmatic Aspects. International journal of philology, 14 (4), 6-14.
Kravchenko, N., Valigura, O., Meleshchenko, V., Chernii, L. (2021). Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication or half a century of IT consumer identity formation: A pragmatics approach. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics, 13, 141–169.
Kravchenko, N., Yudenko. O. (2021). Visual metaphor in commercial Ad: effectiveness or failure? Cognition. Communication. Discourse, 23, 71-80.
Kress, G, Van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 310 p.
Lagerwerf, L., Van Mulken, M., & Lagerwerf, J. B. (2023). Conceptual similarity and visual metaphor: effects on viewing times, appreciation, and recall. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1-13.
Machin, D., & Ledin, P. (2020). Introduction to multimodal analysis. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 256 p.
Margariti, K., L. Hatzithomas, C. Boutsouki, and Y. Zotos. (2022). Α Path to Our Heart: Visual Metaphors and И?White’ Space in Advertising Aesthetic Pleasure. International Journal of Advertising, 41 (4), 731–770.
McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. (1996). Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (4), 424-438.
O'Halloran, K. L. (2023). Matter, meaning and semiotics. Visual Communication, 22 (1), 174-201.
Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4 (1-2), 113-136.
Proctor, T., Proctor, S., & Papasolomou, I. (2005). Visualizing the Metaphor. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11 (1), 55-72.
Schilperoord, J., Cohn, N. (2023). Let there be visual optimal innovations: making visual meaning through Michelangelo’s The Creation of Adam. Visual Communication, 22 (4), 650–670.
Thellefsen, M., & Friedman, A. (2023). Icons and metaphors in visual communication: The relevance of Peirce’s theory of iconicity for the analysis of visual communication. Public Journal of Semiotics, 10 (2), 1–15.
Van Enschot, R., Van Hooijdonk, Ch. & Bronkhorst, E. (2022). Refining replacements. Validating a revised typology of visual metaphor using perceived processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure. International Journal of Advertising, 42 (2), 344-367.
Van Mulken, M., van Hooft, A., & Nederstigt, U. (2014). Finding the tipping point: Visual metaphor and conceptual complexity in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43 (4), 333-343.
Ventalon, G., Erjavec, G., & Tijus, C. (2023). A review of processing and analysing visual metaphors in psychology. European Review of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 1–11.
Walter, E., Gioglio, J. (2014). The Power of Visual Storytelling: How to Use Visuals, Videos, and Social Media to Market Your Brand. McGraw Hill, 237 p.
Zeeshan, A. (2015). Visual metaphors in language of advertising. Language in India, 15(10), 74-82.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
