Linguistic Representation of the Property Category in the English Terminology of the Food Industry

Authors

  • V Lashkul National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog15(2).2024.06

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of the object categorization of English terms of the food industry. The relevance of the article is determined by the need to study object categorization in the formation, structuring and functioning of the English terminology of the food industry. The material of the study was the English-language terms of the food industry, which were obtained by the method of continuous sampling from specialized dictionaries. The analysis was carried out using definitional, semantic, categorical and conceptual research methods. The object category is widely represented by terms that designate concepts used in the terminology of the food industry and serve for their classification. It was determined that the terms representing the object category are divided into six groups: 1) terms for the designation of raw materials; 2) terms for labeling processing products; 3) terms for marking equipment and technology; 4) terms for marking packaging and labeling; 5) terms for designation of trademarks and brands; 6) terms for marking quality control and product safety. Groups of nominations corresponding to the object category are represented by the author. The study has shown that the various subcategories of the object are indeed represented in the specialized terminology of the food industry. The primary objective of the research is to shed light on the role of the object category and its linguistic representation in the English food industry terminology. The research also identifies productive linguistic elements, including special vocabulary, specialized morphemes, and syntactic constructions, that contribute to the formation of terms related to the object category. It is justified that the object category is widely used in the terminology of the food industry, as it is one of the basic categories that play an important role in the birth and formation of the naming of concepts in this industry.

References

Busel, V. T. Busel, (2005). Velykyy tlumachnyy slovnyk suchasnoyi ukrayinsʹkoyi movy [Big Explanatory Dictionary of the Modern Ukrainian Language], Kyiv, Irpin: Perun.

Martynyuk, A. P. (2011). Slovnyk osnovnykh terminiv kohnityvno-dyskursyvnoyi linhvistyky [Dictionary of basic terms of cognitive-discursive linguistics Kharkiv]. Kharkiv : KHNU imeni V. N. Karazina, 196 p.

Narushevich-Vasilyeva, O. V. (2017a). Semantyko-tematychna ta katehoriyno-ponyattyeva orhanizatsiya ukrayinsʹkoyi terminolohiyi kharchovoyi promyslovosti. [Semantic-thematic and categorical-conceptual organization of the Ukrainian terminology of the food industry]. Slovenian terminology today, 567-576.

Narushevich-Vasilyeva, O. V. (2017 b). Ekstralinhvistychni ta linhvistychni chynnyky vynyknennya y formuvannya ukrayinsʹkoyi terminolohiyi kharchovoyi promyslovosti. [Extralinguistic and linguistic factors of the emergence and formation of the Ukrainian terminology of the food industry]. Notes on Ukrainian Linguistics, (24 (1)), 140-148.

Narushevich-Vasilyeva, O. V. (2017 c). [Foreign loanwords in the Ukrainian terminology of the food industry]. Naukovi zapysky Kirovohradsʹkoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Vynnychenka [Scientific notes of Volodymyr Vinnichenko Kirovohrad State Pedagogical University]. Issue 154, 582–586.

Reyda, O. A. (2022). Osnovni problemy pry perekladi terminolohiyi u haluzi kharchovoyi promyslovosti [The main problems in the translation of terminology in the field of food industry]. Mova ta literatura u polikulʹturnomu prostori: materialy mizhnarodnoyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi (Naukova filolohichna orhanizatsiya «Lohos», 11-12 lyutoho 2022r.). [Language and literature in a multicultural space: materials of the international scientific and practical conference (Scientific Philological Organization "Logos", February 11-12, 2022)] Lʹviv. P. 35-37.

Cambridge Dictionary, (2021). Property. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/property

Davidson Alan, Jaine Tom (2014). The Oxford Companion to Food (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Food Industries, Food Standards Agency (UK). URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/food-standards-agency

Food Industry Glossary (2006). URL: https://www.fmi.org/our-research/food-industry-glossary

Kittay, E., (1987), Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 112 p.

Lashkul, V. (2023), Оbject categorization of Еnglish terms in the food industry. International journal of philology. Vol. 12 (4), 2023. 69-76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(2).2023.08

Lakoff, G., (1994), The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 288 p.

Rudzka-Ostyn, B., (1988), Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, p.154.

Selivanova, O., (2000), Cognitive onomasiology. Kyiv: Phytosociocenter, 95 p.

Syrotina, O., Lashkul, V. (2023). Сonceptual categories represented by Еnglish terms of the food industry. Cogito-Multidisciplinary Research Journal. No. 4. Р. 286-303.