Multiculturalism in the Educational System of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg: Key Benefits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(3).2023.011Abstract
Multiculturalism in the educational system of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has become an increasingly important topic in the context of cultural diversity and globalization. This research paper aims to explore the key benefits of multiculturalism in Luxembourg’s educational system. The study delves into the impact of multicultural education policies and initiatives, with a specific focus on the promotion of cultural awareness, enhanced learning experiences, social cohesion, intercultural competence development, and curriculum enrichment. By conducting a comprehensive literature review, examining relevant case studies, and analyzing existing programs, this research aims to identify and highlight the advantages of multiculturalism in fostering inclusive and diverse learning environments.
The findings of this research indicate that multicultural education in Luxembourg plays a pivotal role in fostering increased cultural understanding, broadening perspectives, and nurturing the development of global citizenship among students. Through exposure to diverse cultures, languages, and traditions, students are better equipped to navigate the interconnected world and appreciate the value of different perspectives. Moreover, multicultural education contributes to the cultivation of social cohesion by fostering a sense of belonging and respect among students from different backgrounds. With a specific focus on promotion of intercultural competence, students gain the necessary skills to engage with people from diverse cultures, fostering meaningful connections and reducing prejudice and discrimination. Overall, this research contributes to the understanding of the benefits of multiculturalism in the educational system of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. It provides insights for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders interested in fostering inclusive and culturally diverse learning environments. By embracing multiculturalism in education, Luxembourg can nurture a generation of global citizens who possess the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to thrive in an interconnected world. It is concluded that with Luxembourg’s best practices of making multiculturalism part of the national curriculum, Ukraine may gain immensely in the light of educational reforms in times of recovery after the Russian full-scale invasion that started in February 2022.
References
Banks, J. A. (2016). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (10th ed., pp. 3-30). Wiley.
Chaika, O. (2022a). Poly- / multicultural education in foreign language teaching. International Journal of Philology, 13 (2), 99-108. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/philolog2022.02.010.
Chaika, O. (2022b). Foreign Language Teaching: Content of Poly- And Multicultural Education. International journal of social science and human research, 05(08), 3614–3621. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i8-36.
Educational System in Luxembourg, based on OECD, Education GPS: the world of education at your fingertips (OECD). Available at: https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=LUX&treshold=10&topic=EO
European Commission. Governance of migrant integration in Luxembourg (EC GMIL). https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/country-governance/governance-migrant-integration-luxembourg_en
Irkhina, Y., Mulyk, K., Alekseeva, O., Skyba, K., Postolenko, I., & Amelina, S. (2020). Active Forms of Training Future English Language Teachers. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 182-199.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Luxembourgish Education System, The (2023). https://men.public.lu/dam-assets/catalogue-publications/divers/informations-generales/the-luxembourg-education-system-en.pdf
Martyniuk, W. (2022). Language, Languaging, Plurilanguaging: Considerations on the Nature of language and Language Education. In Piccardo, E., Germain-Rutherford, A., & Lawrence, G. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Plurilingual Language Education. Routledge (pp. 101-111). doi: 10.4324/9781351002783-8.
May, S. (2009). Critical multiculturalism and education. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 33-49). Routledge.
Migration and Inclusive Societies (MIS). Available at: https://mis.uni.lu/resources/
Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2018). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (7th ed.). Pearson.
Piccardo, E., Germain-Rutherford, A., & Lawrence, G. (eds.) (2022). The Routledge Handbook of Plurilingual Language Education. Routledge.
Purschke, C. (2020). Attitudes Toward Multilingualism in Luxembourg. A Comparative Analysis of Online News Comments and Crowdsourced Questionnaire Data. Front Artif Intell, doi:
3389/frai.2020.536086. PMID: 33733199; PMCID: PMC7861285.
Shynkaruk, L. V., & Shynkaruk, V. D. (2019). Issues of interethnic relations in the creative heritage of Panteleimon Kulish. International Journal of Philology, 1(10), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2019.01.028.
Shynkaruk, V., & Kharchenko, S. (2020). Communicative-Functional Potential of Incentive Modality in Psycholinguistic Dimension. Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-28-2-183-203.
Tollefson, J. W., & Pérez-Milans, M. (2018). Research and Practice in Language Policy and Planning. In Tollefson, J. W., & Pérez-Milans, M. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.1.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. https://stairwaytosdg.eu/images/UNESCO_Education_for_Sustainable_Development_Goals_ENG.pdf
Vakulyk, I. I. (2010). The impact of globalization on modern terminology. Crosscultural and trans-national perspectives. Herceg Novi, Montenegro: Enieda, 144.
Wille, C., & Roos, U. (2020). Cross-border everyday lives on the Luxembourg border? An empirical approach: the example of cross-border commuters and residential migrants. In C., Wille & B., Nienaber, Border Experiences in Europe. Everyday Life - Working Life - Communication - Languages (1st, pp. 101-126). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).