Teaching Questioning Speech Acts within Cognitive-Communicative Paradigm: Interdisciplinary Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.01.122Abstract
The article focuses on the problem of developing professional speech skills in advanced university students – prospective English teachers. The authors argue a vivid potential of the integrated research project aimed at raising in students awareness of effective teacher speech acts in the English language classroom. The “Questioning Speech Acts: Teaching Challenges” project was realized within the course “Theory and practice of speech communication” and students’ teaching practice. Questioning speech acts are prioritized in view of their role in the classroom discourse. The purpose of this article is to present the results of the experience teaching questioning speech acts by combining linguistic instruction and practice in professional context through linking knowledge and professional skills acquisition with research work. The study presented is a fragment of the complex investigation aimed at increasing master degree (MA) students’ awareness of questioning techniques as an important element of classroom discourse. The data were collected with the help of the following methods: observations, analysis of the students’ learning activity results, interviews, questionnaires, mathematical processing of obtained data. MA students were to carry out a mini-research within the joint teacher-student project work which comprised 3 stages. Working at the project students were to clarify the following questions: the proportion of questioning speach acts (QSAs) as compared with other speech acts in the EL classroom discourse; QSAs used by native EFL teachers in the classroom discourse with regard to a) the ELL proficiency level, b) lesson stage; QSAs primarily used by students-practice teachers in the classroom; popular QSAs with practice teachers with regard to a) the ELL proficiency level, b) lesson stage. Students were also to assess knowledge and practical skills developed while their working at the project. The point of interest of this research mini-project is its integrated and practically-oriented character provided by cognitive-communicative approach with students learning via cognition and learning via experience in developing QSAs awareness. The experiment results testify the efficacy of the experimental study for MA students’ considerable increase of the proficiency in questioning as an important element of classroom discourse. Work at the project helped students to transform the acquired knowledge to new ways of verbal behaviour, to model successful communication in the EL classroom using questioning techniques, to modify their cognitive teaching styles. Findings of this research yield positive outcomes for developing in university students – prospective English teachers – awareness regarding how language is best taught in ELT classroom.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 167 p.
Sinclair, J. M., & Brazil, D. (1982). Teacher Talk. Oxford University Press. 174 p.
Synytsia, A. (2008). Lohiko-filosofskyi aspekt «movlennievykh aktiv» [Logic and Philosophical Aspect of "Speech Acts"]. Visnyk natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska Politekhnika»: Filosofski nauky. - Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University: Philosophical Sciences, 607, 16-21.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2013). Cambridge Grammar of English. A Comprehensive Guide: Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, M. H., & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom Foreigner Talk Discourse: Forms and Functions of Teachers' Questions. In H. W. Seliger, & M. H. Long (eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268-285). Rowley, MA: Newberry House.
Tsui, A. M. B. (1992). A Functional Description of Questions. In M. Coulthard (ed.), Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis (pp. 162-82). London: Routledge.
Basra, S. M., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A Speech Act Analysis of Teacher Talk in an EFL Classroom. International Journal of Education, 10 (1), 73-81. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i1.6848.
https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i1.6848
Tatsuki, D. H., & Houck, N. R. (2010). Pragmatics from Research to Practice: Teaching Speech Acts. In D. H. Tastuki, & N. R. Houck (Eds.), Pragmatics: Teaching Speech Acts (pp. 1-6). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Judd, E. L. (1999). Some Issues in the Teaching of Pragmatic Competence. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 152-166). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Derry, S. (1996). Cognitive Schema Theory in the Constructivist Debate. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), pp. 163-174.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3103&4_2
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Obdalova, O. A. (2014). Exploring the Possibilities of the Cognitive Approach for Non-linguistic EFL Students Teaching. Language and Culture : Proceedings of the XXV Annual International Academic Conference (pp. 64-71), October 20-22, 2014.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).