Political Discourse Analysis: Milton-Model Focus

Authors

  • A V Kovalevska ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.04.124

Abstract

Abstract. In the article, the author presents the analysis of the verbal influence (also known as suggestion) realization  phenomenon in political discourse, which is usually understood as a holistic combined image of the text (be it an advertisement slogan, a political program, a speech, or an interview) itself and the emotions of its recipient and addressee, including the specificity of perception, external and internal circumstances, its pragmatic, linguistic and extralinguistic aspects, etc, and is aimed at a a political subject’s (politics, political force, power) influencing a political object (audience, electorate, voter). As per usual, political discourse and the potential suggestiveness it possesses are studied from the standpoint of Psychology, Communicative Linguistics, Sociolinguistics, Speech Acts Theory, Advertisement Theory, PR / GR, Political Linguistics and other related sciences, but the author proposes to research the peculiarities of perception, processing and generation of information and its transformations from in-depth thought structures to on-surface speech patterns with the help of involving Neurolinguistic Programming as a modern science which deals with analyzing such concepts. In order to fully research the political discourse, which in the network of this article is represented by the political speeches, electoral advertisement slogans, political programs, interview patterns, and press-conference extracts of the leaders of Ukraine, USA, France, Spain, Italy, Canada, Germany, the author involves the meta- and Milton-model analysis of the text having been researched and developed in the NLP paradigm in order to isolate the actual linguistic influential patterns (markers of language metamodeling processes, simple, complex and indirect inductions). The linguistic algorithm of Milton-model analysis of political discourses having been researched and visually illustrated with relevant examples combines a complex scientific approach within such multisubstrate science as NLP, and thus it will allow not only to single out dominant strategies of constructing texts and mechanisms of these discourses, but also to highlight the ways to counteract their negative effect, as well as serve in the construction of appropriate planning decisions in the field of optimizing the effectiveness of political communication.

References

Bandler, R. & Grinder, D. (1999). Transformeyshn [Transformation]. Syktyvkar : Flinta, 296.

Karasik, V. I. (2002). Jazykovoj krug: lichnosti, koncepty, diskurs [Language circle: personalities, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena, 477.

Kovalevska, T. Yu. (2001). Komunikatyvni aspekty neirolinhvistychnoho prohramuvannia: Monohrafiia [Communicative aspects of neurolinguistic programming: Monograph]. Odesa : Astroprynt, 344.

Kutuza, N. V. (2018). Komunikatyvna suhestiia v reklamnomu dyskursi: psykholinhvistychnyi aspekt: monohrafiia [Communicative suggestion in advertising discourse: psycholinguistic aspect: monograph]. Kyiv : Vydachnychyi dim Dmytra Buraho, 736.

Liubymov, O. Triuizmy [Truisms]. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://nlp.trenings.ru/blog/71-tryuzmyi

Miller, J. (1998). Magicheskoe chislo sem' plyus ili minus dva. O nekotorykh predelakh nashey sposobnosti pererabatyvat' informatsiyu [The magic number is seven plus or minus two. Some limits of our ability to process information]. The psychology of memory. Moscow: CheRo, 564 - 582.

O'Connor, J. & Seymour, J. (1997). Vvedenie v NLP [Introduction to NLP]. Chelyabinsk: Versiya, 256.

Pocheptsov, H. H. (1999). Teoriia komunikatsii [Communication theory]. Kyiv : VTs «Kyivskyi universytet», 308.

Prisyazhniy, S. Triuizmy (Metod kosvennogo vozdeystviya) [Truisms (Method of indirect influence)]. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://nlp.ee/t/1345-trjuizmi

Semeniuk, O. A. (2010). Osnovy teorii movnoi komunikatsii Navch. Posibnyk [Fundamentals of the theory of language communication Textbook. Manual]. Kyiv : VTs «Akademiia», 240.

Slavova, L. L. (2012). Movna osobystist lidera u dzerkali politychnoi linhvopersonolohii : SShA - Ukraina : monohrafiia [Linguistic personality of a leader in the mirror of political linguopersonology: USA - Ukraine: monograph]. Zhytomyr : Vyd-vo ZhDU im. I. Franka, 360.

Sovremennye teorii diskursa: mul'tidistsiplinarnyy analiz : sbornik / gl. nauch. red. O. F. Rusakova (2006). [Contemporary theories of discourse: multidisciplinary analysis: collection / ch. sc. ed. O. F. Rusakova]. Ekaterinburg : Diskurs-Pi, 209.

Shevchenko, I. S. (2005). Problemy typolohii dyskursu. Dyskurs yak kohnityvno-komunikatyvnyi fenomen / Pid zahaln. red. Shevchenko I. S.: Monohrafiia [Problems of discourse typology. Discourse as a cognitive-communicative phenomenon / Ed. in Ch. Shevchenko IS: Monograph]. Kharkiv: Konstanta, 233 - 236.

Sheygal, E. I. Inauguratsionnoe obrashchenie kak zhanr politicheskogo diskursa [Inaugural address as a genre of political discourse] [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://www.philology.ru/linguistics1/sheygal-02.htm

Sheygal, E. I. (2004). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa : monografiya [Semiotics of Political Discourse: Monograph]. Moscow : Gnozis, 326.

Kovalevska, A. V. Information Wars' Pathogenic Texts Neutralization Algorithm (2018). Notes on Ukrainian linguistics = Opera in linguistica ukrainiana. Vol. 25, 227 - 239.

https://doi.org/10.18524/2414-0627.2018.25.141382

Kovalevska, T., & Kovalevska, A. (2020). Utilizing the Neurolinguistic Programming Technologies in Foreign languages Teaching Practice in Ukrainian Universities. Arab World English Journal: Special Issue on English in Ukrainian Context, 184 - 193. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/elt3.16.

https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/elt3.16