Influence of automicobiota on qualitative and quantitative indicators of Scots pine seeds under in vitro conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/forest2019.04.034Abstract
Experimental data have shown that the dominant species in mycobiota of all age groups were Trichoderma viride (20.0–95.8 %), Mycelia sterilia (33–83.3 %), Alternaria alternata (6.7–83.3 %), Cladosporium cladosporioides (6.7–69.2 %). The fungi identified in the process were marked by both stimulating and phytotoxic action. It was found that Trichoderma viride 2016 was the highest in the growth processes of pine seeds (laboratory germination was exceeded by 14–17 %). There was an increase in the length of seedlings by 1.2 cm and the mass of sprouts by 0.07 g. The variety Trichoderma lignorum 201 also had high stimulating properties. Its effect revealed a significant increase in length of seedlings by 1.9 mm and weight by 0.04 g, germination increased by 7–19 %. Variety Trichoderma viride 16 was characterized by a stimulating effect on seed germination (germination share was 18–22%), with the increase of seedlings’ length by 1.5 mm and weight by 0.13 g. Under conditions of treatment with Alternaria alternata 2016, there was an increase in germination during cultivation (14 days) by 7 %, and of seedlings’ length – by 0.3 mm. When treated with this variety, the seedlings weight decreased by 0.2 g. The varieties of Trichoderma viride 2016, Trichoderma lignorum 201, Alternaria alternata 2016, Trichoderma viride 16 stimulated the growth of seedlings of pine by an average of 7–22 % compared to control (Chapek medium). It has been proved that the maximum slowing of the germination processes, i.e. the greatest phytotoxic effect was caused by Fusarium sambucinum 2016, Penicillium variabile 16; Aspergillus fumigatus 2016. According to the studies, Fusarium oxysporum 206, Fusarium sambucinum 16, Penicillium lanosum 201, Trichothecium roseum 2016 slowed growth processes on average by 25.9–74.6 %.
Keywords: automycobiota, seeds, Scots pine, microorganism, variety.
References
Bylai, V. Y. (1992). Methods of experimental mycology. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Russian].
Diakov, Yu. T. (1992). Life strategies of phytopathogenic fungi and their evolution. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Russian].
DSTU 8558: 2015. (2015). Nasіnnya tree i kushchiv. Methods for identifying the latest brilliance (similarities, liveability, goodness): [official report 01.01.2017]. Kiev: State Standards of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Kharchenko, S. M. (1986). Antimicrobial activity of mycotoxins. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Patyka, V. P. (2007). Ecology of microorganisms. Kyiv: Basis [in Ukrainian].
Pidoplichko, N. M. (1977). Atlas of mushroom mushrooms. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Pidoplichko, N. M. (1985). Mushroom flora of roughage Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Pidoplichko, N. M. (1980). Phytotoxicity of fungi of the genus Fusarium - the causative agent of root rot of winter wheat. Microbiology. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Rozenfeld, V. V. (2005). Phytopathogenic properties of strains isolated from pine seeds. Zhytomyr [in Ukrainian].
Sokolov, D. V. (2005). Phytopathogenic properties of strains isolated from pine seeds. Zhytomyr [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).