Formal and informal approaches to theory of argumentation

Authors

  • I. S. Matviienko National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog2020.02.048

Abstract

The article considers the question of formal and informal approaches to theory of argumentation. Nowadays theory of argumentation is getting more and more popular in different spheres of scientific and commercial activity. The progress of theory of argumentation took place in correspondence with the development of science and its theoretical understanding. This situation facilitates the arise of new requirements for critical thinking as formal approach doesn’t give practical advice which could have helped in times of real argumentation and informal one doesn’t provide clear and distinct rules for successful argumentation.

References

Aristotel' (1978) Topika (Topeka) // Sochineniya v 4 tomah. T. 2. M.: Mysl' - 687 s. (Filosofskoe nasledie). [ In Rus-sian]

Johnson R.H., Blair J.A. (1994) Informal Logic: Past and Present// New Essays in Informal Logic. Winsdor, Ontario, Canada.

Uemov A.I. (1997) Osnovy prakticheskoj logiki s zadachami i uprazhneniyami (Fundamentals of prac-tical logic with tasks and exercises). Odessa - 388 s. [In Ukrainian]

Freeman J.B. (2000) The Place of Informal Logic in Philosophy // Informal Logic. Vol. 20, № 2. P. 117-128.

https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i2.2264

Hitchcock D. (2007) Informal Logic and Concept of Argument // Hard-book of the Philosophy of Science. Phi-losophy of Logic. Amsterdam, Vol. 5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451541-4/50007-5

Homenko I.V. (2013) Teoreticheskie problemy neformal'noj logiki: konflikty tochek zreniya // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki (Epis-temology and Philosophy of Science), Moskva. [ In Russian].

Published

2020-09-23

Issue

Section

Article