Modeling of technologies for providing public support for educational reforms based on open-mindedness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog2021.04.068Abstract
The key direction of modern public opinion research is to find ways to reflect a complex social reality in the public consciousness more accurately and develop tools for developing social skills of competent handling of information, especially new or constantly updated. In Ukraine, it is essential to provide public support for educational reforms, given their systemic nature and national significance. The article aims to present a structural model for technology development to provide public support for reforms in general secondary education based on open-mindedness and to determine the criteria for its effectiveness. Open-mindedness is defined as a set of cognitive and socio-emotional skills, which determine one`s ability to flexibly and adaptively handle new information and new experiences. Based on theoretical and empirical stages of research, the principles of construction of technologies of formation of public opinion based on the open-mindedness are defined: the principle of equality and interactivity of subjects of public opinion; the principle of analytical and synthetic information processing; the principle of focusing on the completeness of experience. The author proposes the model and application scenario of public opinion forming technology, taking into account the two-level manifestation and two-component structure of open-mindedness as a complex skill and the stages of its formation – from information analysis through reflexive processes to its synthesis. The author describes cognitive (critical thinking skills, ability to form a three-dimensional vision of the problem based on its essential characteristics, structured presentation of the position) and socio-emotional (providing feedback, conflict resolution with a focus on the goal, emotional literacy, empathic listening) open-mindedness criteria.
References
Slyusarevsʹkyy, M. (2016). Hromadsʹka dumka z pytanʹ osvity: preferentsiyi, superechnosti ta perspektyvy zbahachennya. Vseukrayinsʹkyy naukovo-praktychnyy zhurnal «Dyrektor shkoly, litseyu, himnaziyi», 17(4-6), 48-61.
https://doi.org/10.5771/0934-9200-2016-1-48
Frolov, P. D. (2014). Hromadsʹka dumka: kryteriyi ta modeli konsolidatsiyi. Naukovi studiyi iz sotsialʹnoyi ta politychnoyi psykholohiyi, vyp. 34, 234-247.
Chunikhina, S. (2020). Suspilʹne stavlennya do osvitnikh reform: doslidzhennya problemy vidkryto stisudzhenʹ (open-mindedness). Visnyk Kyyivsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriya «Psykholohiya», 1(11), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.17721/BSP.2020.1(11).12
https://doi.org/10.17721/BSP.2020.1(11).12
As'ari, A.R., Kurniati, D., Abdullah, A.H., Muksar, M., & Sudirman, S. (2019). Impact of Infusing Truth Seeking and Open-Minded Behaviors on Mathematical Problem-Solving. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1019-1036. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.606031
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.606031
Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Emlen Metz, S. (2015). Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003
Doney, J., Wegerif, R. (2017). Measuring Open-Mindedness: An evaluation of the impact of our school dialogue programme on students' openmindedness and attitudes to others. Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. 60. https://institute.global/sites/default/files/inline-files/Measuring%20Open-mindedness_29.06.17.pdf
Hawken, J. (2019). Philosophical discussions with children: an opportunity for experiencing open-mindedness. Childhood & Philosophy, 15, 1-20. doi:10.12957/childphilo.2019.42982
https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2019.42982
Lord, M. (2015). Group learning capacity: The roles of open-mindedness and shared vision. Frontiers in psychology. 6. 150. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00150.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00150
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Shearman, S.M., Levine, T. (2006). Dogmatism Updated: A Scale Revision and Validation. Communication Quarterly, 54(3), 275-291.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370600877950
Tjosvold, Dean; Poon, Margaret (1998). Dealing with scarce resources: openminded interaction for resolving budget conflicts. Group & Organization Management. 23 (3).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).