On universality of perception of movement and time in the artworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(2).2024.262-273Abstract
The article examines the issue of perception of movement and time in works of fine art. The perception of works of art is not only related to perceptual processes and the cognitive sphere of a person, but is a personal and worldview issue, as it is related to the system of personality stereotypes - cognitive phenotypes formed in the process of life and professional experience. The conventional view on the perception of movement and its intensity in visual arts, which was considered as universal for a long time, was that the perception of movement from left to right is more natural and fast, and movement from right to left, respectively, is complicated, slow and less intense. These provisions became the basis for an experimental study of the perception of movement and time in works of art, in which two groups of respondents participated. The experimental group (N=38) consisted of people who are not closely familiar with the art and rules of composition arrangement. The control group (N=30) consisted of students professionally studying art history and visual arts. Both groups only included people whose first language had left to right writing. As experimental material, the subjects were offered to answer how they see the intensity of movement in paintings by famous artists. Each picture was presented in an original and a flipped image, where the movement was reflected in the opposite direction. The results of the study analyzes using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov λ statistical test, which demonstrates the presence or absence of regularities in the subjects' choice of picture numbers that correspond to forward or reverse movement in the picture. With the help of this test, a gender comparison of the features of perception of movement and time in works of art was also carried out. The results of the experimental study question the universality of the perception of movement and time in fine art and require verification in further research.
References
Bakalenko O.A. Psykholohiia spryiniat-tia ta pererobky informatsii: Navchalnyi posibnyk Kharkiv: HNUPE, 2017. 124 p. (in Ukrainian) URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Olena-Bakalenko/publication/331159527_Psihologia_sprijnatta_ta_pererobki_informacii/links/5c69388a299bf1e3a5adb183/Psihologia-sprijnatta-ta-pererobki-informacii.pdf
Lozova O. Osoblyvosti semiozysu v pertseptsii obrazotvorchoho mystetstva. Psykholohiia khudozhnoi tvorchosti. Khrestomatiia / O.Lozova, S.Kopylov, M.Shevelova. Tom 3. London, GlobeEdit, 2023. P. 121-164. (in Ukrainian) URL: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/47896/1/O_Lozova_OSPOM_FPSRSO.pdf
Orhanizatsiia tvorchoho spryimannia na riznykh vikovykh rivniakh : metodychni rekomendatsii / V. O. Moliako, I. M. Bila, N. A. Vahanova ta in.; za red. V. O. Moliako. K.: Pedahohichna dumka, 2015. 57 p. (in Ukrainian) URL: http://library.mdu.edu.ua/Documents/NAPN/institut%20psihologii/metod%20rekom/%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%96%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F%20%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%87%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE.pdf
Pysanko M. M. Rukh, prostir i chas v obrazotvorchomu mystetstvi. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola, 1995. 99 p. (in Ukrainian) URL: https://salo.li/3fCD7AE
Psykholohichni problemy spryimannia: materialy XX Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (25 travnia 2020 roku, m. Kyiv) / za red. V.O. Moliako. K: Instytut psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy, 116 p. (in Ukrainian) URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/721799/1/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B8_2020_2.pdf
Tsybulskyi A.A. Spryiniattia chasu ta yoho vzaiemozviazok z osnovnymy psykhichnymy protsesamy // Habitus. 2022. Vyp.43. P. 209-217. (in Ukraini-an) URL: http://habitus.od.ua/journals/2022/43-2022/37.pdf
Arnheim R. (1974) Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of Creative eyes. Los-Angeles: University of California Press. 230 c.
Åsne Røsvoll, Emilie H. Rusten & René Westerhausen (2024) Left-hand preference in visual artists: A pre-registered observational study on Instagram. Laterality: asymmetries of brain, behaviour, and cognition, 2024, Vol. 29, No. 2, 184–198. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2024.2315856
Boroditsky L., Fuhrman O., McCormick K. (2010). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition. 118. 123-9. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.010.
Boroditsky Lera, Fuhrman Orly (2010). Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task. 2010.
Boroditsky, Lera (2011). How languages construct time. In Stanislas Dehaene & Elizabeth Brannon (eds.). Space, Time and Number in the Brain. Oxford University Press. pp. 333-341.
Candini, Michela & D’Angelo Mariano & Frassinetti Francesca (2022). Time Interaction With Two Spatial Dimensions: From Left/Right to Near/Far. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Volume 15. 2022.
De Wit, Matthieu & Kamp, John & Withagen, Rob. (2015). Visual illusions and direct perception: Elaborating on Gibson's insights. New Ideas in Psy-chology. 36. 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.07.001.
Egizii, Matthew & Denny, James & Neuendorf, Kimberly & Skalski, Paul & Campbell, Rachel (2012) Which Way Did He Go? Directionality of Film Character and Camera Movement and Subsequent Spectator Interpretation.
Gibson, J. J. (1970). On the relation between hallucination and perception. Leonardo, 3(4), 425-427.
Gibson, J. J. (1978). The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo, 11, 227-235.
Gregory R. (1997) Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 280 p.
Henrich, Joseph; Blasi, Damián E.; Curtin, Cameron M.; Davis, Helen Elizabeth; Hong, Ze; Kelly, Daniel & Kroupin, Ivan (2022). A Cultural Species and its Cognitive Phenotypes: Implications for Philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14 (2):349-386.
Kandinsky, W. (1926). Point and line to plane. New York: Dover Publications. Edited by Hilla Rebay. 203 p.
Kühnapfel, Corinna & Fingerhut, Joerg & Brinkmann, Hanna & Ganster, Victoria & Tanaka, Takumi & Specker, Eva & Mikuni, Jan & Güldenpfennig, Florian & Gartus, Andreas & Rosenberg, Raphael & Pelowski, Matthew (2023). How Do We Move in Front of Art? How Does This Relate to Art Experience? Linking Movement, Eye Tracking, Emotion, and Evaluations in a Gallery-Like Setting. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 42. doi:10.1177/02762374231160000.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).