Corporate education as requirement of globalized economy: the example of the USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog2019.04.039Abstract
. The development of modern computer and telecommunication technologies provides opportunities for global development of business. In turn, the globalization of the economy where only competitive companies can survive in the global markets, acts as an important trigger for the development of corporate education, because securing competitive positions is impossible without the training of qualified, competent employees. In such circumstances, the authors aim to explore the impact of the globalized economy on the development of corporate education in the United States as a world leader in this field. The study suggests that globalization processes across all sectors of the economy have a powerful impact on the development of corporate education in the United States. It has been determined that in the context of globalization, the need for corporate education is primarily due to the following main factors: development of modern computer and telecommunication technologies, integration and standardization of production activity, as well as its coordination at the global level, enhancement of labor mobility and changes in its structure, the rapid immigration processes, the occurrence of global crisis, the emergence of new competitors in the market, the shortening of the product’s life cycleReferences
Allen, M. (2010). Corporate uni-versities 2010: Globalization and greater sophistication. The Journal of International Management Studies, 5(1), 48–53.
Baron, A., & Armstrong, M. (2007). Human Capital Management: Achieving added value through people. London, UK: Kogan Page.
Ben-Hur, S. (2015). The Business of Corporate Learning: Insights from Practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
Dealtry, R. (2017). The future of corporate universities: how your company can benefit from value and performance-driven organisational development. Bingly, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Dubasenyuk, O. (2016.). Problemy pedagogizaciyi profesijnoyi osvity v umovax cilozhyttyevogo navchannya osoby stosti v konteksti idej akademika I. A. Zyazyuna [Prob-lems of pedagogicalisation of voca-tional education in conditions of life-long learning in context of ideas of Academician I.A. Ziazun]. In O. A. Dubasenyuk (Ed.), Teoriya i praktyka profesijnoyi majsternosti v umovax cilezhyttyevogo navchannya (pp. 32-58). Zhy`tomy`r: Ruta.
Fay, C. H., McCune, J.T., & Begin, J. P. (1987). The setting for con-tinuing education in the year 2000. In R. G. Brocket (Ed.), Continuing educa-tion in the year 2000 (pp. 15-27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Finger, M. (2005). Globalization. In L. M. English (Ed.), International en-cyclopedia of adult education (pp. 269-273). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hart, G. (1983). Investing in people for the information age. Futur-ist, 17 (1), 10-14.
Hill, C. (1997). Informational Business. Burr Ridge, IL: Ir-win/McGraw-Hill.
Hoyle, R. (2015). Informal learning in organizations: how to create a continuous learning culture. London; New York: Kogan Page Limited.
Lockwood, N. R. (2003). The ag-ing workforce: The reality of the impact of older workers and eldercare in the workplace. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.
Lytovchenko, I. (2016). Rozvytok korporatyvnoyi osvity v konteksti suspil`stva znan`: amerykanskyj dosvid [Development of corporate ed-ucation in context of knowledge socie-ty: The American experience]. Pedagogika formuvannya tvorchoyi osobystosti u vyshhij i zagal`noosvitnij shkolax, 50 (103), 178–183.
McKay, B. (2009). Coke Bets on Russia for Sales Even as Economy Falls Flat. The Wall Street, January 28, A1, A12.
Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R.S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A com-prehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Naisbitt, J., Aburdene, P. (1990). Megatrends 2000: Ten new directions for the 1990s. New York: Morrow.
Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee training and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Noe, R. A. (2013). Human re-source management: gaining a com-petitive advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ogienko O. (2016) Facilitation in the context of pedagogical activities. Advanced Education, 5. 85-89. DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286.70621
Rowden, R. W. (1996). Current realities and future challenges. In R. W. Rowden (Ed.), Workplace learn-ing: debating five critical questions of theory and practice (pp. 3–10). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Strother, J. B. (2002). An as-sessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training pro-grams. Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3 (1), 1-17.
Toossi, M. (2012). Labor force projections to 2020: A more slowly growing workforce. Monthly Labor Re-view, January, 43-64.
Valentine, T. (1997). United States of America: the current predom-inance of learning for the job. In P. Belanger, & S. Valdivielso (Eds.), The emergence of learning societies: Who participates in adult learning? (pp. 95-108). Oxford: Pergamon
Zbryczka, T. (2013). Perevagy stvorennya korporaty vnogo universytetu yak instrumentu rozvytku personalu [Advantages of creating a corporate university as tool for em-ployee training]. Visnyk socialno-ekonomichnyh doslidzhen`, 48, 354-358.
Zieghan, L. (2000). Adult educa-tion, communication, and the global context. In Wilson A. L., Hayes E. R. (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continu-ing education (pp. 312–326). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Zelikovska, O. (2010). Cross-Cultural Communication as a Basis of Building Intercultural Competence. Edukacja-Technika-Informatyka, 2(1), 71-75.
Zelikovska, O. (2018). Formu-vannya mizhkulturnoyi kompetentnosti u studentiv IT spetsialnostey: suchasnyy vymir. [Development of the intercultural competence in IT stu-dents: current approach.]. Naukovyy visnyk Instytutu profesiyno-tekhnichnoyi osvity NAPN Ukrayiny. Ser.: Profesiyna pedahohika, (15), 129-135.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
