Globalization, civilizations, and stadial universalism

Authors

  • T. V. Kychkyruk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog2020.01.058

Abstract

The contradictions between the various paradigms of civilization and the related problems of world globalization, as well as the interaction of civilizations are the subject of many sciences. Globalization is interpreted as the interaction of civilizations. Thus, civilization becomes one of the main categories in the process of explaining and understanding the world. Today there is no generally accepted definition of the term “civilization” - it is defined and interpreted differently. Sometimes it is used as a synonym for the term “culture”. Civilization can also refer to society as a whole. The “embryos” of the civilizational-stadial approach to the historical development appeared in the eighteenth century, when the concept of civilization was introduced into scientific circulation; and the representatives of this approach grounded their ideas on the unity of the world history. According to the stadial approach to the development of society, the historical process is characterized by progressiveness and gradual development. This approach is based on the linear time model. The paper aims to investigate such phenomena as “civilization” and “stadial universalism”. 

References

Asojan Ju., Malafeev A. (2000). Istoriografija koncepta «cultura» (Antichnost' - Renessans - Novoe vremja) [Historiography of the concept of "culture" (Antiquity - Renaissance - Mod-ern Times)] // Otkrytie idei kul'tury. Opyt russkoj kul'turologii serediny XIX - nacha-la XX vekov [The discovery of the idea of culture. The experience of Russian cul-tural studies in the mid-19th - early 20th centuries]. Moscow, 29-61.

Danylova T. (2014). Ap-proaching the East: Briefly on Japanese Value Orientations. Research Revolution. International Journal of So-cial Science & Management, VII(8), 4-7.

Danylova T. V. (2016). The Desire for recognition in the Context of Francis Fukuyama's Universal History. Anthropological Measurements of Philo-sophical Research, 10, 69-77. doi 10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87303

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87303

Engels F. (2010). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. Penguin Classics, 320.

Ferguson A. (1995). An Es-say on the History of Civil Society. Cam-bridge University Press, 283.

Kuzyk B. N., Jakovec Ju. V. (2010). Civilizacii: teorija, istorija, dialog, budushhee [Civilizations: theory, history, dialogue, future]. Vol. 5. Civilizacii: proshloe i budushhee [Civilizations: Past and Future]. Moscow: Institute for Eco-nomic Strategies, 576 p.

Mirabeau V.de R. (2009). L'ami des Hommes, ou Traité de la Popu-lation. University of Michigan Library, 438.

Mogran L. H. Ancient Socie-ty, Or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barba-rism to Civilization. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/morgan-lewis/ancient society/index.htm

Standage T. A History of the World in 6 Glasses. - Walker Publishing Company, 2006. - 311 p.

Shynkaruk L. V., Sala-ta H. V., Danylova T. V. (2018). Dialogue of Cultures: E. Hall and F. Kluckhohn. National Academy of managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 3, 128-133.

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.14731

Shynkaruk V. D., Sala-ta, H. V., Danylova T. V. (2018). Myth as the Phenomenon of Culture. National Academy of managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 4, 17-22.

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2018.152938

Tylor E. (2012). Anthropol-ogy; an introduction to the study of man and civilization. Ulan Press, 490.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-26

Issue

Section

Article