Spiritual commonality: conceptualization of notional discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog2020.02.064Abstract
The article shows that in modern socio-political discourse the concept of spiritual commonality is usually associated with the Act of Unification of 1919, i.e. voluntary unification, “union” of the UPR and WUPR, which resulted in a single conciliar UPR. At first glance, such a merger seems obvious and may not provoke any discussion, but it does not. After all, according to dictionary data, in the XIX-XX centuries, the term “spiritual commonality” was used to denote “unity” and “indivisibility”, which were and remain superfluous characteristics of unitary states and ethnic nations. Moreover, using the concept of “spiritual commonality”, meaning “indivisibility” or “unification”, which is realized through the introduction of a common paradigm of existence and development, we thus emphasize the consciously constructed nature of socio-political and ethno-cultural unity and open the way to various political speculations. As shown in the paper, it is possible to get rid of the latter only if spiritual commonality is explicated as a concept aimed at emphasizing voluntary unity; in its process the worldview and value priorities being established and life guidelines being produced, which are recognized by all members of the community.
References
Aksakov K. S.(1889). Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 4-h tt. [Full composition of writings]. Universatetskaya tipografIa. Vol.1. 522.
Belei L., Belei O. (2001). Staro-sloviansko-ukrainskyi slovnyk [Old Slav-ic-Ukrainian dictionary]. Svichado, 332.
Berdyaev N.A. (1912). Aleksey Stepanovich Homyakov [Alexey Stepa-novich Khomyakov]. Izdatelstvo "Put", VIII, 250, [6].
Bondar S. V. (2005). Istoriosofiia I. Lysiaka-Rudnytskoho v konteksti natsiotvorchykh ta derzhavotvorchykh protsesiv v Ukraini [Іstorіosofіya І. Lisyak-Rudnitsky in the context of national and those power-building processes in Ukraine] : avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nau-kovoho stupenia kand. filos. nauk: spets. 09.00.05 «Istoriia filosofii». Kyiv, 16.
Horban T. Yu. (2005). Ideia sob-ornosti v ukrainskii suspilno-politychnii dumtsi pershoi chverti KhKh st. [The idea of conciliarity in Ukrainian suspension and political thinking of the twentieth century.]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 6, 95-102.
Hoian I. M., Storozhuk S. V., Fedyk O. V. (2018). Rol kolektyvnoi pamiati v protsesi formuvannia natsion-alnoi yednosti: ukrainskyi vymir. [The role of collective memory in the process of formulating national goals: Ukrainian vimir]. Humanitarnyi chasopys, 1, 11-22.
Hrushevskyi M. (2000). Halychyna i Ukraina [Galicia and Ukraine]. Natsionalizm : [antolohiia]. Smoloskyp, 447-452.
Ilarion (mytropolyt). (1982). Ukrainska Tserkva [Ukrainian Church. Essays on the history of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church]. Narysy z istorii ukrainskoi pravoslavnoi tserkvy (u dvokh tomakh). Druhe popravlene y dopovnene vydannia za redaktsiieiu prot. Stepana Yarmusia. Vinnipeh, 336.
Ilarion Kyivskyi. Slovo pro Za-kon i Blahodat [A word about the Law and Grace]. URL: http://litopys.org.ua/oldukr/ilarion.htm
Kryvda N. Yu., Storozhuk S. V. (2016). Kulturna identychnist yak osnova kolektyvnoi yednosti [Cultural identity as the basis of collective unity]. International education journal of innovative technoli-gies in social science, 4(8), Vol. 2, 58-63. DOI: 10.31435/rsglobal_ ijitss/01062018/5710
Lysiak-Rudnytskyi I. (1994). Ukrainska Natsionalna Rada y ideia sob-ornosti [Ukrainian National Council and the idea of catholicity]. Lysiak-Rudnytskyi I. Istorychni ese [Historical essays], Vol. 2, 271-283
Lyubker F. (1885). Realnyiy slovar klassicheskih drevnostey [The real dictionary of classical antiquities]. Tipografiya A.S. Suvorina, IV, 1552.
Piskun O. I. (1994). Sobornist i deiaki aktualni problemy suchasnoi etnopolityky. Problemy sobornosti Ukrainy u KhKh stolitti [Conciliarity and some current problems of modern ethno-politics.]. Kyiv, 8-14.
Rostovskiy Dmitriy (sv.) Zhizn i trudyi prepodobnyih ottsov nashih Mefodiya i Konstantina, v monashestve Kirilla, uchiteley slavyanskih [The life and works of the venerable fathers of our Methodius and Constantine, in the mo-nasticism of Cyril, Slavic teachers]. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Dmitrij_Rostovskij/zhitija-svjatykh/414
Rudnytskyi S. (1994). Chomu my khochemo samostiinoi Ukrainy [Why we want an independent Ukraine]. Lviv, 416.
Semmo O. (1989). Sobornist (21.I.- 31.VIII.19) [The conciliarity]. Filadelfiia, 47.
Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 tt. (1978). [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language] / AN URSR. Instytut movoz-navstva; za red. I. K. Bilodida. Kyiv: Nau-kova dumka, Vol.9, 916.
Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 tt. (1973). [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language] / AN URSR. Instytut movoz-navstva; za red. I. K. Bilodida. Naukova dumka, Vol. 4. 840.
Storozhuk S. (2014). Natsional-izm: Problema vyznachennia ta inter-pretatsii [Nationalism: The Problem of Definition and Interpretation]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia Filosofiia, 31 (324), 28-33.
Ukraina v XX stolitti (1900-2000): 3b. dokumentiv i materialiv (2000). [Ukraine in the XX century (1900-2000): 3b. documents and materials] / Uporiad.: A. H. Sliusarenko, V. I. Husiev, V. Yu. Korol ta in. Vyshcha shkola, 351.
Fedorov N. F. (1997). Sobranie sochineniy v chetyireh tomah. V 4-h tt. [Collected works in four volumes]. Traditsiya, Vol.3. 743.
Homyakov A.S. (1886). Polnoe sobranie sochinieniy: v 8-mi tt. [Complete Works: in 8 vols]. Universatetskaya tipo-grafIa, Vol.2, 450.
Iurchuk V. I. (1994). Sobornist Ukrainy u formuvanni rehionalnoi poli-tyky [Unity of Ukraine in the formation of regional policy]. Problemy sobornosti Ukrainy u KhKh stolitti. Kyiv, 168-176.
Yannaras Hr. (1992). Vera Tserkvi [Faith of the church]. Tsentr po izucheniyu religiy, 232.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
