Content and structure of social practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(1).2024.126-140Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of defining social practices and their content, in which a comprehensive approach to the study of social practices is justified. To this end, it is necessary to adhere to the following methodological guidelines: first, the postmodern vision of reality, which emphasizes pluralism as a worldview and methodological guideline for understanding social processes; secondly, the study of social practices in the aspect of everyday life, based on the methodological guidelines of background knowledge and the concept of the "revealing" nature of practices; thirdly, theories of social action that exist in modern sociology, since the core of any social practice is social activity. The article notes the fact that today in science, three levels of social practices are distinguished depending on the role of the subject, namely, social practices of subjects in everyday activities, social practices of groups and communities, social practices of institutions and organizations. The nature of social practices is explained by two approaches - the background character of the practice and the "revealing" nature of the practices. Background practice is the context against which utterances and behavior are interpreted. The "revealing" nature of practices is related to the problem of identities. Practices constitute and reproduce identities or reveal basic modes of social existence at a specific historical moment. Meaningfully, social practices have spatial and temporal localization and may differ depending on the historical period, cultural features of the country or region, and the state system. The article provides a description of social time and social space, analyzes the space-time continuum - the chronotope. The third element of social practices is social action, which acts as the nucleus around which all social life revolves. Social practices are implemented in routine acts of practical actions of individuals in everyday life, existence and functioning of social groups and communities, functioning of social institutions.
References
. Balich N. (2013). Cotsialni praktyky ta yikhnia rol u suchasnomu suspilstvi. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketynh. № 4. S.69–78
Hubeladze I.H. (2021). Pochuttia vlasnosti yak sotsialno-psykholohichnyi fenomen: kontseptualizatsiia poniattia. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii. № 43 (46). S. 141–148. URL: https://doi.org/10.33120/ssj.vi43(46)
Boichenko M.I. (2023). Mnozhynnist filosofskykh praktyk Hryhoriia Skovorody u suchasnomu prochytanni. Filosofska dumka. № 2. S. 117–131.
Hyddens Е. (2005). Ustroenye obshchestva: Ocherk teoryy strukturatsyy. M. 528 s.
Volkov V., Kharkhordyn, O. (2008). Teoryia praktyk. Sankt-Peterburh: Yzd-vo Evropeiskoho unyversyteta v Sankt-Peterburhe. 290 c.
Searle John (1980). The Background of Meaning. Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, ed. J. Searle et al. Dordrecht. Р. 221-232.
Dreyfus Hubert (1991). Being-ln-The-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being And Time, Division I. MIT Press. 370 р.
Rail Hylbert. (1999). Poniatye soznanyia. M.: Ydeia-Press. 408 s.
Polanyi M. (1974). Personal Knoweledge. Towards Post-Critical Philosophy. Тне University оf Chicago Press. 428 р.
Shtompka P. (2020). Sotsiolohiia. Analiz suspilstva. Lviv: Kolir PRO. 800 s.
Seniura O.V. (2015). Chynnyky transformatsii sotsialnoho prostoru mista v sotsiolohichnomu dyskursi. Hrani. Naukovo-teoretychnyi i hromadsko-politychnyi almanakh. № 8 (124). S. 81-89.
Burde P. (1998). Struktura, habytus, praktyka. Zhurnal sotsyolohyy y sotsyalnoi antropolohyy. T. 1. No 2. S. 40-58.
Burde P. (1993). Sotsyolohyia polytyky. M.: Socio-Logos. 336 s.
Zymmel H. (1996). Sotsyolohyia prostranstva. In: Zymmel Heorh. Yzbrannoe: v 2 t. M.: Yuryst, T.2. 607 c.
Lefebvre H. (1994). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell. 464 p.
Sorokyn P. (1992). Sotsyalnaia stratyfykatsyia y mobylnost. Chelovek. Tsyvylyzatsyia. Obshchestvo. M.: Yzd-vo polyt. lyt-ru. S. 230-331.
Dodonova V.I. (2011). Postneklasychnyi dyskurs sotsialnoi ratsionalnosti: Monohrafiia. Donetsk: Vyd-vo DonNU. 345 s.
Sotsialni praktyky v hlobalnomu vymiri (2009). / B.V. Popov, O.V. Nelha, V.B. Fadieiev, V.V. Bahinskyi, H.Iu. Nosova. K.: Instytut filosofii im. H.S. Skovorody NANU, 292 s.
Ivaniuk I. (2019). The space of the social and the kyrotype of man in the socio-philosophical context Liudyna i kultura. Ostroh: Vyd-vo NaUOA. Р. 209-221.
Reckwitz A. (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory. No 5(2). P. 243–263. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
Nastoiashcha K.V. (2018). Atrybutsii poniattia praktyky: kolizii oznachennia ta poshuky veryfikatsii. Sotsiolohiia. № 21(1). S. 56–62. URL: https://doi.org/10.15421/17186
Filosofski vymiry suchasnoi sotsialnoi realnosti: monohrafiia (2013). / ed. O.V. Andriienko, V.I. Dodonovoi. Donetsk: DonNU, S. 4–11, 35–49.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
