Exploring the nature of consciousness: Michael Graziano's attentional schema theory and Bernard Baars' global workspace theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog14(3).2023.212-220Abstract
The article examines the modern discourse on the problem of consciousness in the context of theories about the biological and physical basis of consciousness. In order to consider problematic issues of consciousness, two theoretical approaches to consciousness are analyzed: Michael Graziano's attention schema theory and Bernard Baars' global workspace theory. By describing the key characteristics of each approach, it is determined what aspects of consciousness they propose to explain, what their neurobiological commitments are, and what empirical evidence is cited to support them. Researching the theories of Michael Graziano and Bernard Baars helps in understanding how the brain creates conscious experience, which is key to progress in the field of cognitive science and neuroscience. Understanding the nature of consciousness is important for philosophical and ethical discussions related to questions of responsibility, self-awareness, and other aspects of social existence. The research also promotes interaction between different fields of science, such as neurobiology, psychology, philosophy and computer science, which creates an integrated approach to the study of consciousness. When writing this article, the following methods were used: discourse analysis, in order to obtain substantiated information about the theories of consciousness of Michael Graziano and Bernard Baars, about various aspects of theories of consciousness, their main principles and interaction with other theories. Comparativist approach: a comparative analysis of the theories of Michael Graziano and Bernard Baars was carried out, highlighting their common and distinctive features. Comprehensive approach: a wide range of knowledge and information was used to write the article in order to provide a complete and objective overview of theories of consciousness.
References
Rod Caird, Ape Man ISBN 978-0-85766-478-5 Chapter 3, “Thinking”
Dawkins R. The Selfish Gene. London: Folio Society; 2019.
Are We Really Conscious? (10 October 2014) – Michael Graziano – The New York Times
Saxe, R; Wexler, A (2005). "Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction". Neuropsychologia. 43 (10): 1391–1399
Baars BJ. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2000.
Bernard J. Baars, "Understanding Subjectivity: Global Workspace Theory and the Resurrection of the Observing Self" Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, No. 3, 1996,
Graziano MSA Webb TW. The attention schema theory: a mechanistic account of subjective awareness. Frontiers in psychology. 2015:500-500. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00500
Daniel C. Dennett, "The Evolution of Consciousness," Consciousness and Emotion in Cognitive Science: Conceptual and Empirical Issues (1998) ed. Josefa Toribio & Andy Clark
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).