Egg-laying features, weight and size of germinative duck chimeras eggs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/animal2021.04.001

Keywords:

germinative chimera, Shaoxing duck, Shanma, busulfan, duck egg productivity

Abstract

The consequences of chimerization and its possible influence on the productivity of chimera offspring remain poorly understood. The objects of research were ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) of the Shanma (Shan partridge duck) and Shaoxing breeds kept at the Zhuji Guowei Poultry Development Co, Ltd, P.R.China. The study was conducted in the poultry genetics laboratory of the Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences on a duck farm of Zhejiang Generation Biological Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Province, PRC). To create chimeras of ducks, the method described by Aige-Gil, Simkiss, 1991; M.T. Tagirov, 2010 was used. Blastodiscs have been isolated from freshly hatched fertilized  eggs using a filter paper ring. Shanma duck embryos have been used as recipients, and Shaoxing duck embryos, homozygous for plumage color gene allele (wild type), have been used as donors. Busulfan (SigmaAldrich, United States) have been used as a chemical agent that suppresses a division of primary germ cells (PGC) of recipient embryos. A hole in an eggshell (window) of  recipients (Shanma breed) have been made between a blunt and sharp ends of eggs. (This reduced a distance between an injector and an embryo needle). The recipients havebeen incubated for 8–10 hours at a temperature of 38 °C. After recipient eggs incubation for 8 hours, the windows were opened in them. Busulfan was injected into the subgerminal cavity of the embryo with a micropipette (1.5–3 μl of liquid). After busulfan injection, the empty cavity was filled with culture medium (RPMI-1640) supplemented with antibiotics (ampicillin, streptomycin), the hole was closed by plastic wrap and adhesive tape. The eggs have been incubated at a reduced temperature (+32 °C) for 24 hours with the aim of prolong the duration of busulfan action on the PGC (primary germ cells). More than 50% of embryos have been died in the first 2–3 days (after an  incubation start). Head and neck disorders have been observed in the 1.2% of embryos. Busulfan injection  at a concentration of 300 ng per egg have been leads to 95.0–96.3% mortality of duck embryos, concentration of 150 ng per egg, a mortality rate of 33.3–75.3% have been observed, concentration to 75 ng led to 18.75–38.5% of embryonic mortality. Analysis of the age of puberty (laying of the first egg) indicates that the chimeras matured later. If in the control group the average age of puberty was 139 ± 9 days, in the group of chimeras - 148 ± 13 days. Thus, we can attest that in our experiment, the chimeras matured later than the control animals, which may be due to the effect of busulfan in the sterilization of recipient embryos. The average weight of ducks in the control group was lower, and the group itself was more consolidated. Thus, in the control ducks weighed 1422.40 ± 57.00 g, the chimeras 1608.80 ± 94.76 g. The advantage of live weight chimeras over the control group may be due to the fact that the control group consisted of recipients served by Shanma animals. Egg production of ducks for the entire study period was   87.5 ± 0.05 % (control) 79.5±0.12 % (busulfan). The weight of eggs of ducks of two groups for the entire period was 70.62±0.199 g (control) and 71.15±0.157 g (p˂0.001). The eggs morphometric parameters of the studied ducks groups were: the average values of egg length were 6.056±0.0564 cm (control) and 6.269±0.1341cm (busulfan); egg breadth were 4.520±0.0053 cm (control) and 4.529±0.004 cm (busulfan). There were no statistical intergroup differences in the morphometric parameters of the eggs of the studied groups. In fact, we obtained results similar to the previous ones, which concerned the egg production of daughters of drake chimeras.

Author Biography

  • S. O. Kostenko, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
    кафедра генетики, розведення і біотехнології тварин НУБіП України

References

Kagami, H. (2016). Perspectives on avian stem cells for poultry breeding. Animal Science, 87, 1065-1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12620

Mozdziak, P. E., & Petitte, J. N. (2004). Status of transgenic chicken models for developmental biology. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 229(3), 414-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10461

Tjørve, K. M. C., & Tjørve, E. (2010). Shapes and functions of bird-growth models: how to characterise chick postnatal growth. Zoology, 113(6), 326-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2010.05.003

Ogilvie, L. A., Kovachev, A., Wierling, C., Lange, B. M., & Lehrach, H. (2017). Models of models: a translational route for cancer treatment and drug development. Frontiers in oncology, 7, 219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00219

Pavlou, A. K., & Reichert, J. M. (2004). Recombinant protein therapeutics - success rates, market trends and values to 2010. Natural Biotechnology, 22, 1513-1519. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1204-1513

Petitte, J. N., & Mozdziak, P. E. (2014). Production of transgenic poultry. In Transgenic animal technology. (pp. 335-357). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410490-7.00012-8

Devlin, R. H., Sakhrani, D., Tymchuk, W. E., Rise, M. L., & Goh, B. (2009). Domestication and growth hormone transgenesis cause similar changes in gene expression in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106. 3047-3052. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809798106

Gordon, J. W., & Ruddle, F. H. (1981). Integration and stable germ line transmission of genes injected into mouse pronuclei. Science, 214(4526), 1244-1246. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6272397

Love, J., Gribbin, C., Mather, C., & Sang, H. (1994). Transgenic birds by DNA microinjection. Biotechnology, 12, 60- 63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0194-60

Perry, M. M. (1988). A complete culture system for the chick embryo. Nature, 331, 70-72. https://doi.org/10.1038/331070a0

Ginsburg, M., & Eyal-Giladi, H. (1987). Primordial germ cells of the young chick blastoderm originate from the central zone of the area pellucida irrespective of the embryo-forming process. Development, 101, 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.101.2.209

Kagami, H., Tagami, T., Matsubara, Y., Harumi, T., Hanada, H., Maruyama, K., ... & Naito, M. (1997). The developmental origin of primordial germ cells and the transmission of the donor‐derived gametes in mixed‐sex germline chimeras to the offspring in the chicken. Molecular Reproduction and Development: Incorporating Gamete Research, 48(4), 501-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199712)48:4<501::AID-MRD11>3.0.CO;2-W

Kino, K. B., Pain, B., Leibo, M., Cochran, M., Clark, M. E., & Etches, R. J. (1997). Production of chicken chimeras from injection of frozen-thawed blastodermal cells. Poultry Sciences, 76, 753-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.5.753

Chen, Y. C., Lin, S. P., Chang, Y. Y., Chang, W. P., Wei, L. Y., Liu, H. C., ... & Wu, S. C. (2019). In vitro culture and characterization of duck primordial germ cells. Poultry Science, 98, 1820-1832. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey515

Szta'n, N., Patakine' Va'rkonyi, E., Lipto'i, K., & Barna, J. (2012). Baromfifajok embriona'lis sejtjeinek kezele'se'vel szerzett tapasztalatok [Observations of embryonic cell manipulations in different poultry species]. Magy. Allatorvosok, 8, 475-481.

Aige-Gil, V., & Simkiss, K. (1991). Sterilisation of avian embryos with busulphan. Research in veterinary science, 50(2), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5288(91)90096-7

Tagirov, M. T. (2010). Poluchenie himergermintativnoj linii ptic [Production of Chimerkingtint Bird Line]. Biotechnologya, 3(2), 82-88.

Lucas, A. M., & Jamroz, C. (1961). Atlas of Avian Hematology. Washington. D. C: U. S. Department of Agriculture.

Sawicka, D., Brzezińska, J., & Bednarczyk, M. (2011). Cryoconservation of embryonic cells and gametes as a poultry biodiversity preservation method. Folia biologica (Kraków), 59(1-2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3409/fb59_1-2.01-05

Korol, P. V., Kostenko, S. O., Konoval, O. M., Lu, L., & Li, L. (2019). Egg productivity of EGFP-transgenic ducks. Animal science and food technology, 10(3), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.31548/animal2019.03.020

Korol, P. V., Kostenko, S. O., Konoval, O. M., Doroshenko, M. S., Lu, L., Chepiha, A. M., … & Drahulian, M. V. (2021). Optimization of semen preparation biothechnological procedures for DNA transfection with lipofectamine. Biodiversity, ecology and experimental biology, 23(1), 52-58.

Korol, P. V., Kostenko, S. O., Konoval, O. M., Doroshenko, M. S., Lu, L., Chepiha, A. M., … & Drahulian, M. V. (2021). Transgenesis biotechnological procedures influence of domestic duck embryos survival. Scientific Reports of NULES of Ukraine, 4(92), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2021.04.006

Korol, P. V., Kostenko, S. O., Konoval, O. M., Doroshenko, M. S., Lu, L., Chepiha, A. M., … & Filipova, P. (2021). Efficacy of blastodermal cells and CRISPR/CAS9 method in the creation of transgenic duck (Anas Platyrhynchos). Biopolymers and Cell, 4(37), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.7124/bc.000A5B

Doroshenko, M. S., Kostenko, S. A., Sviridenko, N. P., Litvinenko, T. V., Konoval, O. N., Lu, L., … & Li, L. (2021). Duck hermintative chimer offsprings productivity. Innovations in animal husbandry and safety of animal products. Achievements and outlooks, 287-294.

European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes. (1986). COETSER 1 (18 March 1986). Retrieved from http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/treaties/COETSER/1986/1.html

Petitte, J. N., Clark, M. E., Liu, G., Verrinder Gibbins, A. M., & Etches, R. J. (1990). Production of somatic and germline chimeras in the chicken by transfer of early blastodermal cells. Development, 108, 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.108.1.185

Doroshenko, M. S., Chepiga, A. M., Kostenko, S. O., Korol, P. V., Konoval, O. M., Lu, L., ... & Li, L. (2018). Influence of reproductive season on sperm productivity germinative chemer of spleen. Breeding and genetics of animals, 55, 187-195. https://doi.org/10.31073/abg.55.26

Kostenko, S., Konoval, O., Chepiha, A., Korol, P., Doroshenko, M., Lu, L., ... & Li, L. (2017). Genetic diversity and population structure of Shaoxing and Shanma ducks breeds by microsatellite loci. Scientific Bulletin of NULES of Ukraine, 271, 110-121.

Chepiha A. M., Kostenko S. O., Konoval O. M., Lu L., Bu X., Huang L., Huang X., & Li L. (2017). Monitoring of eggs productivity of the Shaoxing breed ducks of different age. Scientific reports of NULES of Ukraine, 0(6(70)). https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2017.06.011

Chepiha, A. M., Kostenko, S. O., Korol, P. V., Doroshenko, M. S., Konoval, O. M., Lu, L., … & Li, L. (2017). Analysis of physical and morphological parameters and incubation ability of eggs in Shaoxing ducks of different ages. Breeding and genetics of animals, 54, 119-126. https://doi.org/10.31073/abg.54.15

Shaoxing Ducks [S]: DB 33068/T 02.1-2012.-Zhuji: Zhuji Quality and Technique Supervision Bureau, 2012. - (National Standard of China). 40.

Zhelyazkov, E., & Tsvetanova, Y. (2002). Manual of Genetics. Stara Zagora, 175-195.

Xia, W. G., Chen, W., Abouelezz, K. F. M., Azzam, M. M. M., Ruan, D., Wang, S., … & Zheng, C. T. (2019). Estimation of calcium requirements for optimal productive and reproductive performance, eggshell and tibial quality in egg-type duck breeders. Animal, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000648

Adamski, M. (2005). The effect of genotype on egg morphological and physical traits of ducks during the first laying period. The works of The Commission of Agricultural and Biological Sciences BTN, 55, 13-24.

Rahman, M. M., Khanr, M. J., Aiam, M.S., Islam, M. A., & Ranaa, M. J. (2010). Egg quality characteristics of three genotypes of duck reared in the coastal area of Bangladesh. Journal of the Bangladesh Society for Agricultural Science and Technology, 97-102.

Gorski, J., Pietkiewicz, M., & Witak, B. (1998). Evaluation of egg quality in meat ducks. Science Journals PTZ Breeding Journal, 36, 349-356.

Huang, J. F., & Lin, C. C. (2011). Production, composition, and quality of duck eggs. Council of Agriculture, Taiwan Woodhead Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093912.4.487

Chepiha, A. M., Kostenko, S. O., Korol, P. V., Konoval, O. M, Lu, L., Bu, X., … & Li, L. (2017). Analysis of physical-morphological indicators of eggs of different color in the shaoxing breed of ducks. Collection of scientific works "Visnyk of Zaporizhzhya National University. Biological Sciences", 2, 34-41.

Chepiga, A. M., Kostenko, S. A, Svyrydenko, N. P., Doroshenko, M. S., Kyrienko, A., Korol, P. V., … & Lu, L. (2018). Microsatellite analysis of the population of the rock with different levels of egg productivity. Scientific bulletin of NUBIP. Series technology of production and processing of livestock products, 289, 77-85.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-23