Physicochemical and microbiological research of raw-milk material

Автор(и)

  • O. M. Yakubchak Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України image/svg+xml
  • Т. V. Таran Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України image/svg+xml
  • V. О. Ushkalov Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України image/svg+xml
  • S. V. Міdyk Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України image/svg+xml

Анотація

Abstract. Introduction. Ukraine is actively implementing safety legislation and certain indicators of food quality, in particular raw milk, to the requirements of the European Union. Modern requirements for raw milk require careful analysis of hygienic indicators. Materials and methods. Raw milk materials supplied to Bila Tserkva Dairy Plant LLC and PJSC Vita Dairy Plant of Kyiv Region were studied. The number of mesophilic aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms (KMAFAM) and the species composition of the milk microflora, in particular, bacteria of the genus Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli bacteria (psychotrophs) and Physico-chemical methods were used to determine: density, mass fraction of dry matter, somatic cell content, acidity, purity group, mass fraction of protein and fat. Results and Discussion. According to research, the quality of farm milk is an order of magnitude better than milk obtained from private farms, in particular, KMAFAM. The technology of obtaining farmer's milk ensures its production of the highest and first grades, while the milk obtained in the conditions of private peasant farms – the first grade and non-grade. According to physicochemical parameters, milk obtained under different conditions did not differ significantly. Microbiological parameters differed significantly. The average number of MAFANM milk from private farms was 4361.25±241.15, which is 12.6 times higher than the number of MAFANM even milk of the first grade obtained in a dairy farm. Irrespective of the season and conditions of raw milk production, all tested samples met the requirements of the current DSTU for the absence of bacteria of the genus Salmonella in 25 cm3, Staphylococcus aureus, 0.1 cm3 and Listeria monocytogenes, 25 cm3. Bacterial bacteria were not detected in farm milk during the year, in contrast to milk from private farms, where this group of bacteria was detected in spring and autumn (20% of cases). Both in farming and in milk from private farms, a group of mesophilic microorganisms prevailed over spore-forming and psychrotrophic ones. However, their number was different. Prospects for further research are to determine the sources of various types of microorganisms in raw milk and to develop procedures to eliminate the possibility of contamination of milk with foreign microflora.

Key words: raw milk, farm milk, milk from private farms, milk microflora, quality indicators

 

Посилання

Nakaz № 118 (12.03.2019) "Vymohy do bezpechnosti ta yakosti moloka i molochnykh produktiv". Nabrav chynnosti 15.07.2019 roku (zareiestrovanyi v Ministerstvi yustytsii Ukrainy 07.06.2019 za №593/33564) [Order № 118 of 12.03.2019 "Requirements for safety and quality of milk and dairy products". Entered into force on 15.07.2019 (registered with the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine on 07.06.2019 under №593 / 33564)]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0593-19#Text (in Ukrainian).

CAC/RCP 57/2004 Code of Hygienic Practice for Milk and Milk Products. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ livestockgov/ documents/CXP_057e.pdf

Bohnlein, C., Fiedler, G., Loop, J., Franz, C., & Kabisch, J. (2021). Microbiological quality and safety of raw milk from direct sale in northern Germany. International Dairy Journal, 114, Article 104944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104944

Oliveira, C. J. B., Hisrich, E. R., Moura, J. F. P., Givisiez, P. E. N., Costa, R. G., & Gebreyes, W. A. (2011). On farm risk factors associated with goat milk quality in Northeast Brazil. Small Ruminant Research, 98(1–3), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.03.020

V. Chaharovskyi (2020). Molochna haluz Ukrainy ta yii maibutnie cherez 10 rokiv: problemy, natsionalna prohrama rozvytku ta derzhavna pidtrymka. [V. Chagarovsky. Ukraine's dairy industry and its future in 10 years: problems, national development program and state support]. AgroPolit.com. Available at: https://agropolit.com/blog/412-molochna-galuz-ukrayini-ta-yiyi-maybutnye-cherez-10-rokiv-problemi-natsionalna-programa-rozvitku-ta-derjavna- pidtrimka. (in Ukrainian).

Ukrinform (2020). Eksport molochnoi produktsii z Ukrainy tsohorich skorotyvsia na chvert [Ukrinform. Exports of dairy products from Ukraine fell by a quarter this year]. Available at: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-economy/3023697-eksport-molocnoi-produkcii-z-ukraini-cogoric-skorotivsa-na-cvert.html (in Ukrainian).

DSTU 3662:2018 (2018). Moloko-syrovyna koroviache. Tekhnichni umovy. [DSTU 3662:2018 Raw cow's milk. Specifications]. Kyiv: DP "UkrNDNTs", 8. (in Ukrainian).

Pronko, L., Kolesnik, T., & Samborska, O. (2020). Ukraine Dairy Market: State and Prospects of Development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n1p243

Burke, N., Zacharski, K., Adley, C. C., & Southern, M. (2021). A comparison of analytical test methods in dairy processing. Food Control, 121, Article 107637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107637

Campos, G. Z., Lacorte, G. A., Jurkiewicz, C., Hoffmann, C., Landgraf, M., Franco, B., & Pinto, U. M. (2021). Microbiological characteristics of canastra cheese during manufacturing and ripening. Food Control, 121, Article 107598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107598

Ledo, J., Hettinga, K. A., & Luning, P. A. (2020). A customized assessment tool to differentiate safety and hygiene control practices in emerging dairy chains. Food Control, 111, Article 107072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107072

Moradi, M., Omer, A. K., Razavi, R., Valipour, S., & Guimaraes, J. T. (2021). The relationship between milk somatic cell count and cheese production, quality and safety: A review. International Dairy Journal, 113, Article 104884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104884

Rios-Muniz, D., Cerna-Cortes, J. F., Lopez-Saucedo, C., Angeles-Morales, E., Bobadilla-del Valle, M., Ponce-de Leon, A., & Estrada-Garcia, T. (2019). Longitudinal Analysis of the Microbiological Quality of Raw Cow's Milk Samples Collected from Three Small Family Dairy Farms in Mexico over a 2-Year Period. Journal of Food Protection, 82(12), 2194–2200. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-19-155

Jans, C., Kaindi, D. W. M., & Meile, L. (2016). Innovations in food preservation in pastoral zones. Revue Scientifique Et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties, 35(2), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.35.2.2527

Kondrasii L. A., Yakubchak O. M. (2016). Yakisni zminy moloka-syrovyny za vplyvu riznykh hihiienichnykh umov otrymannia. [Raw milk changes qualitative under the influence of different hygienic conditions of production]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii imeni S. Z. Gzhytskoho. 18, 3(71), 41–44. (in Ukrainian).

Kondrasii L. A., Yakubchak O. M., Osypova T. Yu. (2016). Naukovo-praktychne obgruntuvannia pokaznykiv yakosti moloka-syrovyny za riznykh umov yoho vyrobnytstva. [Scientific and practical substantiation of raw milk quality indicators under different conditions of its production]. Problemy zooinzhenerii ta veterynarnoi medytsyny. 33(2), 149–154. (in Ukrainian).

Willis, C., Jorgensen, F., Aird, H., Elviss, N., Fox, A., Jenkins, C., Fenelon, D., Sadler-Reeves, L., & McLauchlin, J. (2018). An assessment of the microbiological quality and safety of raw drinking milk on retail sale in England. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 124(2), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13660

Zulauf, M., Zweifel, C., & Stephan, R. (2018). Microbiological quality of raw milk sold directly from farms to consumers in Switzerland. Journal of Food Safety and Food Quality-Archiv Fur Lebensmittelhygiene, 69(5), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.2376/0003-925x-69-140

Завантаження

Опубліковано

2021-06-29

Номер

Розділ

Статті