Mathematical models ontology of technological objects for industrial enterprises. Part 2. ontology implementation and verification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/energiya2(66).2023.039Abstract
The article proposes the implementation of an applied ontology of mathematical models of technological objects for the design of a subsystem of decision-making support, which issues recommendations for the mathematical apparatus in relation to the development goals for the automated management of a food enterprise. It consists of 46 entities with corresponding relationships, attributes, and axioms, and is also implemented in the OWL language by the Protege open platform tools, taking into account existing standards and recommendations. In the structure of the ontology, the mathematical model is represented as branches of subclasses with the corresponding sets of attributes, characterized by their relationship to the higher-level model. Within this ontology, 17 types of relationships are presented. Applied ontology passed two stages of verification: structural - based on generally accepted estimates; logical - by testing queries and manually checking the correctness of the results. In particular, examples of model selection using an ontology for virtual sensors are given. The use of the proposed ontology in the structure of the management decision support subsystem increases the efficiency of these decisions, the validity of management actions and the efficiency of the technological component of the enterprise. Also, the ontology can be integrated into the ontology of industrial enterprises tasks or other domain ontologies.
Key words: mathematical model, ontology, concept, technological process, relationship, automation
References
Cheng, H., Zeng, P., Xue, L., Shi, Z. (2016). Manufacturing Ontology Development Based on Industry 4.0 Demonstration Production Line. Conference: 2016 Third International Conference on Trustworthy Systems and their Applications (TSA), 42–47. doi:10.1109/TSA.2016.17.
Omelchenko, О.S., Lutska, N.M., Vlasenko, L.О. (2023). Mathematical models ontology of technological objects for industrial enterprises. Part 1. Formation of the basic concepts for the subject area. Energy and automation, 1, 23-41.
Kumar, V. R. S., Khamis, A., Fiorini, S., Carbonera, J. L., Alarcos, A. O., Habib, M., Olszewska, J. I. (2019). Ontologies for industry 4.0. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 34.
Bone, M., Blackburn, M., Kruse, B., Dzielski, J., Hagedorn, T., Grosse, I. (2018). Toward an interoperability and integration framework to enable digital thread. Systems, 6(4), 46. doi: 10.3390/systems6040046.
Chevallier, Z., Finance, B., Boulakia, B.C. (2020). A reference architecture for smart building digital twin. International Workshop on Semantic Digital Twins (SeDiT). Extended Semantic Web Conference.
Dibowski, H., Massa Gray, F. (2020). Applying knowledge graphs as integrated semantic information model for the computerized engineering of building automation systems. Extended Semantic Web Conference, 12123, 616–631. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_36.
Chaves-Fraga, D., Priyatna, F., Cimmino, A., Toledo, J., Ruckhaus, E., Corcho, O. (2020). GTFS-Madrid-Bench: a benchmark for virtual knowledge graph access in the transport domain. Journal Web Semantics 65, 100596. doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2020.100596.
Cao, Q., Zanni-Merk, C., Reich, C. (2018). Ontologies for Manufacturing Process Modeling: A Survey. 5th International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04290-5_7.
Yahya, M., Breslin, G.J., Intizar Ali, M. (2021). Semantic Web and Knowledge Graphs for Industry 4.0. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 5110. doi:10.3390/app11115110.
Lupenko, S.A., Lytvynenko, Іa.V., Zozulya, A.M., Chizoba, N.K., Volyanyk, O.V. (2021). Models, methods and means of ontology development of cyclic signal processing. Journal of hydrocarbon power engineering, 8 (1), 8–17. doi: 10.31471/2311-1399-2021-1(15)-8-17.
Ploennigs, J., Semertzidis, K., Lorenzi, F., Mihindukulasooriya, N. (2022). Scaling Knowledge Graphs for Automating AI of Digital Twins. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2022, 810–826. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2210.14596.
Bader, S., Grangel-González, I., Nanjappa, P., Vidal, M. (2020). A Knowledge Graph for Industry 4.0. ESWC2020, 1–16.
A free, open-source ontology editor and framework for building intelligent systems. Available at: https://protege.stanford.edu/.
Gomez-Perez, A. (2004). Ontology Evaluation. In Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_13.
Lovrencic, S., Cubrilo, M. (2008). Ontology evaluation – Comprising verification and validation. Proceedings of the Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems (CECIIS 2008). Varazdin, Croatia, 24–26.
Parsia, B., Matentzoglu, N., Goncalves, R. S., Glimm, B., Steigmiller, A. (2015). The OWL Reasoner Evaluation (ORE) 2015 Competition Report. J. Autom. Reason, 59, 455–482.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
