Dictionary of Variant Vocabulary in the Light of Monographic Description: Theoretical Justification

Authors

  • T V Hromko ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.03.006

Abstract

Abstract. The article theoretically substantiates the Dictionary of variant vocabulary of a separate idiom as a particular aspect dictionary in a monodialect lexicographic complex. Nowadays, in the field of dialectology, word variability is explained by incompleteness or lack of empirical basis, failure to master the available factual material, insufficient attention to ways of studying formal modifications of the word, poor coverage of source and methodological issues. The urgency of the problem is determined by a number of theoretical provisions: 1) variability, being an immanent property of any kind of language, is widely represented in dialectal speech; 2) formal variation of the word ensures the continuity of speech as a system of language; 3) the lexicon of the dialect, the dialectolingual, is an information-research lexicographic system of the idiom – the thesaurus. A generalized review of the theoretical foundations of the dialectological lexicography of the variant vocabulary of the dialect allowed us to conclude about the specifics of the presentation of the dialect linguistics in it. The results of the research represent the Dictionary of variant vocabulary of speech as an aspect one, which is a part of a monodialect lexicographic complex, having unified rules of demonstration of language units and at the same time differing in its structural and nomenclatural parameters of lexical-semantic variations of language units. The dictionary of variant vocabulary of speech is seen by us as a representative of complexity, diversity of the phenomenon of formal variation of a dialect word, as a demonstration of a number of formal-semantic connections in vocabulary for further monodialect description focused on monographic description of speech. Lexicography of materially oscillating vocabulary within one idiom in the future is focused on the consideration of the peculiarities of word variation in the system of speech as a separate stratum of language.

References

Arkushyn, H. L. (2000), Slovnyk zakhidnopoliskykh hovirok [Dictionary of Western Polissya dialects]: u dvokh tomakh. Lutsk: Vezha.

Akhmanova, O. S. (1957), Ocherki po obshchey i russkoy leksikologii [Essays on general and Russian lexicology]. Moskva: Uchpedgiz. 295.

Bogoslovskaya, Z. M. (2006), Dialektnaya variantologiya: leksikologicheskiy i leksikograficheskiy aspekty [Dialectal variantology: lexicological and lexicographic aspects]: dis. ... doktora filol.: 10.02.01 / Tom. gos. un-t. Tomsk. 401.

Bogoslovskaya, Z. M. (2000), Slovar variantnoy leksiki sibirskogo govora. [Dictionary of the variant vocabulary of the Siberian dialect]. T. 1: A-K / Pod red. O. I. Blinovoy. Tomsk. Tomskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. 304.

Bondar, O. I. (2010), Slovnyk ukrainskykh hovoriv Odeshchyny. [Dictionary of Ukrainian dialects of Odessa region]. Odesa: Odeskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. I. I. Mechnykova. 222.

Vinogradov, V. V. (1944), O formakh slova [About the Word Forms]. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Otdeleniye literatury i yazyka [News of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Department of Literature and Language]. Moskva. (III/1). 31-44.

Gak, V. G. (1998), Yazykovyye preobrazovaniya [The Language Conversions]. Moskva: Shkola «Yazyki russkoy kul'tury». 768.

Hlukhovtseva, K. (2005), Variatyvnist dialektnykh yavyshch u systemi ukrainskykh skhidnoslobozhanskykh hovirok [Variability of dialect phenomena in the system of Ukrainian East Slobozhansk dialects]. Volyn'-Zhytomyrshchyna [Volyn-Zhytomyr region]. (14). 48-54.

Golovina, E. V. (1991), Formal'naya variantnost' v rechi dialektnogo tipa: Ucheb. posobiye po spetskursu [Formal variance in dialect-type speech: A textbook for a special course]. Kirov. 102.

Hrytsenko, P. Yu. (1990), Areal'ne variyuvannia leksyky [The Areal Variation of Vocabulary]. Kyiv. 272.

Hromko, T. (2020), Systema hovirkovykh yavyshch v monodialektnykh opysakh [System of speech phenomena in monodialect descriptions]. Naukovyi visnyk Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky [Scientific Bulletin of the Lesia Ukrainka East European National University. Series: Philological Sciences]. Lutsk. (407/3). 24-28.

Ivantsova, Ye. V. (1993), Otrazheniye var'irovaniya slova v dialektnykh slovaryakh [Reflection of word variation in dialect dictionaries]. Russkiye govory Sibiri. Leksikografiya [Russian dialects of Siberia. Lexicography]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta. 87-91.

Mel'nychuk, O. S. (1981), Rozvytok movy yak realnoi systemy [Development of language as a real system]. Movoznavstvo [The Linguistics]. (2). 22-34.

Sabadosh, I. V. (2008), Slovnyk zakarpatskoi hovirky sela Sokyrnyts'ia Khusts'koho raionu [Dictionary of the Transcarpathian dialect of the village of Sokyrnytsia, Khust district]. Uzhhorod: Lira. 480.

Smirnitskiy, A. I. (1957), K voprosu o slove (problema «tozhdestva slovа») [On the question of the word (the problem of "word identity")]. Trudy Instituta yazykoznaniya [Studies of the Institute of Linguistics]. Moskva. (4). 3-50.

Sokolov, O. M. (1997), Osnovy implitsitnoy morfologii russkogo yazyka [Fundamentals of the implicit morphology of the Russian language]. Moskva: Izd-vo «RUDN». 203.

Tkach, M. M. (2019), Slovnyk hovirkovykh, rozmovnykh, ridkovzhyvanykh ta zastarilykh sliv ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of dialect, colloquial, rarely used and obsolete words of the Ukrainian language]. Chernihiv: PAT «PVK «Desna». 1000.

Hromko, T. V. (2020), Theoretical fundamentals of lexicographic variation of idiom. Korszerű műszerek és algoritmusa tapasztalati és elméleti tudományos kutatási: tudományos művek gyűjteménye a nemzetközi tudományos-gyakorlati konferencia anyagaival [Modern instruments and algorithms of experiential and theoretical scientific research: a collection of scientific works with the materials of the international scientific-practical conference]. September 18, 2020. Budapest, Hungary: European Scientific Platform. (3). 63-64.

https://doi.org/10.36074/18.09.2020.v3.24

Downloads