Directive Acts in International Legal Discourse: Scale of Illocutionary Force Intensity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(2).2023.02Abstract
Abstract. The article introduces an eight-component taxonomy of directives in international legal discourse, depending on the degree of illocutionary force, based on the criteria of illocutionary markers, directive force mitigators and modifications of the prototypical structure of directives. The research integrates the methods of speech act analysis, tools of the theory of mitigation and discourse analysis. An eight-point degree of intensity distinguishes directives with the verbs "shall" and "must" to indicate obligations in the performative part of the prototypical structure of directives. The seventh-point degree is marked by “should” to designate recommendation. Explicit directives extended with hedges specifying possibilities of the norm adaptation in favor of the capabilities of states fall under the sixth position. The fifth degree of intensity is typical for acts marked with adjectives indicating the urgency of action. The fourth position on the scale of deintensification pertains to directives with obligative verbs in the passive construction of the propositional component, with the performative component being omitted. Directives occupying the third position on the scale of illocutionary force intensity are marked, in addition to the omitted performative component, with hedges that allow for deviation from the norm in application. A two-point degree of intensity distinguishes acts with an omitted performative component in which the position of the phrasal subject is taken by nominations of the object of obligations, instead of legal subjects. Directives with an omitted performative component, where the legal subject is replaced by the designation of the object of the directive action and the performative verb is replaced by an indirect marker of obligation, occupy the first position in terms of de-intensified illocutionary force level.
References
Alston, W. (2000). Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Austin, John Langshaw. (1970). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1985). Modifiers as indicating devices: The case of requests. Theoretical Linguistics,12, 213–229.
Caffi, C. (2006). Mitigation. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 171–175). Oxford: Elsevier.
Caffi, C. (1999). On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 31 (7), 881-909.
Cap, P. (2019). Discourse studies: Between social constructionism and linguistics. A critical overview. Topics in Linguistics, 20 (2), 1-16
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Convention on the Rights of the Child, (1989). Retrieved Jan 6 from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, (2006). Retrieved Febr 6 from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html
Declaration of Ethical Principles in relation to Climate Change, (2017). Retrieved Febr 10 from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260889.page=127
Declaration of Principles on Tolerance, (1995). Retrieved June 10 from: https://tolerance.tavaana.org/en/content/declaration-principles-tolerance
Demir, C. (2018). Hedging and academic writing: an analysis of lexical hedges. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14 (4), 74-92.
Dunn, K. C., & Neumann, I. B. (2016). Undertaking Discourse Analysis for Social Research. University of Michigan Press.
English Style Guide (2021). A handbook for authors and translators in the European Commission. European Commission. Eighth edition: January 2016. Retrieved Jan 8 from: English Style Guide (europa.eu).
Fairclough N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge
Fraser, B. (1980). Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 4 (4), 341-350.
Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, (1949). Retrieved Aug 20 from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/geneva-convention-relative-treatment-prisoners-war
Gmerek, K. (2021). Procedural Acts as Double-Conventionalized Acts: Considerations on Conventional Acts Performed in a Courtroom Discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34, 473–495.
Green, M. (2020). The Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haverkate, H. (2010). Deictic categories as mitigating devices. Pragmatics, 2 (4), 505-522.
Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8 (3), 345-365.
Ibanez, C.V. (2020). Recognising mitigation: Three tests for its identification. Journal of Pragmatics, 68-79.
International convention for the suppression of the financing of terrorism, (1999). Retrieved Aug 2 from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/db/terrorism/english-18-11.pdf
ISO (2021).Principles and rules for the structure and drafting of ISO and IEC documents. Retrieved Aug 6 from: https://www.iso.org/sites/directives/current/part2/index.xhtml#_idTextAnchor090
Kone, N. (2020). Speech Acts in UN Treaties: A Pragmatic Perspective. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 10 (6), 813-827.
Kravchenko, N., Blidchenko-Naiko, V., Yudenko, O. (2023). Discursive pragmatics via classical rhetoric in the European discourse of assistance to Ukraine" (based on English-language speeches of German politicians). Cogito, XV (2), 194-214.
Kravchenko, N., Yudenko, O., Chaika, O., Kryknitska, I., Letunovska, I. (2022). Commissive Modality of International Legal Discourse: An Implicit Mitigation of the Bindingness. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12 (6), 1039-1047.
Kravchenko, N., Prokopchuk, M., Pozhar, A., Rozhkov, Y., & Kozyarevych-Zozulya, L. (2022а). Illocutionary Pragmatic Adaptation Challenge: Ukrainian Translations of English-language Soft Law Texts. Amazonia Investiga, 11 (49), 267–276.
Kravchenko, N., Pasternak, T., Korotka, S. (2021). Deontic modality in epideictic discourse: Speech acts facet (based on COVID-associated texts). Cogito: Multidisciplinary research journal. 13 (2), 167–18.
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nartey M, Mwinlaaru I.N. (2019) Towards a decade of synergising corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: a meta-analysis. Corpora, 14 (2), 203–235.
Pablos-Ortega, C. (2020), Directive Speech Acts in English and Spanish Filmspeak. Sociocultural Pragmatics, vol. 8 (1), 105-125.
Reynolds, C. (2019). Building theory from media ideology: Coding for power in journalistic discourse. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 43 (1), 47-69.
Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, (1992). Retrieved July 2 from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf
Sbisa, M. (2001). Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1791–1814.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R., Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Slomanson, W. R. (2011). Fundamental Perspectives on International Law. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Suzanne Jeans.
Stoffel, C. (2007). Intensives And Down-Toners: A Study In English Adverbs. Kessinger Publishing, LLC.
Thaler, V. (2012). Mitigation as modification of illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, (6–7), 907-919.
Tiersma, P. (2010). Legal Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tran T. Q., Tang T. B. (2022). Hedging in the Results and Discussion Section of English Applied Linguistics. Research Articles by Vietnamese and Foreign Writers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1 (13), 119-124.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, (1992). Retrieved Aug 1 from: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
United Nations Declaration against Corruption and Bribery in International Commercial Transactions, (1997). Retrieved Aug 5 from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/233080
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, (1948). Retrieved Jun 12 from: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, (1961). Retrieved Aug 12 from: https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_1_1961.pdf.
Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis. A Cross-Theoretical Inquiry. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15 (1), 203-234.
WTO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, (2003). Retrieved Aug 14 from: https://fctc.who.int/
Zappettini F, Krzyżanowski, M (2019). The critical juncture of Brexit in media & political discourses: from national-populist imaginary to cross-national social and political crisis. Critical Discourse Studies, 16 (4), 381–388.
Zuhrotunnisa, E. I. K., & Zuliati, R. (2021). Directive Acts in Onward Film by Dan Scanlon. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 3 (2), 161–177.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
