The role of prosodic means in realizing the pragmatic effect

Authors

  • L S Kozub ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2019.02.045

Abstract

Abstract. The article deals with the pragmatics of an oral informational text and its correlation with intonation. Special attention is paid to the theory of intonation. The work highlights the importance of an illocutionary act by which the definite communicative intention is meant and studies the illocutionary function of intonation, which is the marker of the illocutionary act.

The pragmatic function of intonation is viewed as one of the main functions of the linguistic system. The intonational division of the text into syntagms is one of the main ways of expressing the pragmatic function of intonation in oral texts. It does not only create discretion that is necessary for understanding of the text content, but also integrates the segmented units that form the content of the text as a whole. The obtained results may contribute to further study of the prosodic organization of oral informational texts, particularly TV commercials, their influence on the addressee and peculiarities of their perception.

References

Austin, J. L. (1986). Slovo kak deystvie [How to Do Things with Words]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in Foreign Linguistics. XVII Speech acts theory]. Moscow, Progress, 22 129 [in Russian].

Belichenko, L. G. (1990). Pragmaticheskaya funktsiya prosodii v nekotoryih vidah realizatsii informatsionno-publitsisticheskogo teksta [Pragmatic function of prosody in some types of the informational and publicistic text realization]. Prosodicheskie sredstva organizatsii stilisticheski razlichnyih tekstov v sovremennom angliyskom yazyike [Prosodic means of organizing stylistically different texts in contemporary English]. Moscow, MSPI, 43 63 [in Russian].

Belyakov, A. A. (1983). Pragmaticheskie harakteristiki introspektivnyih segmentov [Pragmatic Characteristics of Introspective Segments]. Pragmaticheskie aspektyi izucheniya predlozheniya i teksta [Pragmatic aspects of the study of the sentence and the text]. Kiev, 95 101 [in Russian].

Kalita, A. A. & Taranenko, L. I. (2012). Kriteriy urovnya aktualizatsii emotsionalno-pragmaticheskogo potentsiala vyiskazyivaniya [The criterion of actualization level of an utterance's emotional and pragmatic potential]. Naukovі zapiski. Serіja: Fіlologіchnі nauki (movoznavstvo) [Proceedings of Kirovograd State Pedagogical University named after. V. Vynnychenko. Series: Philological Sciences (linguistics)], 105 (1), 476-484 [in Russian].

Klaus, G. (2018). Sila slova [The Power of Words]. Мoscow, URSS, 216 [in Russian].

Kozub, L. S. (2015). Rol prosodii dlia realizatsii vplyvu na adresata [The Role of Prosody in Realizing the Influence on the Addressee]. Suchasni doslidzhennia z inozemnoi filolohii [Modern studies in foreign philology]. Uzhhorod, Autor-Shark, 74-79 [in Ukrainian].

Lentsa, D. L. & Soloviova, Ye. V. (1989). Fonetika v aspekte pragmatiki [Phonetics in the Aspect of Pragmatics]. Chisinau, Shtiintsa, 94 [in Russian].

Matveeva, G. G. (1984). Aktualizatsiya pragmaticheskogo aspekta nauchnogo teksta [Actualization of the Pragmatic Aspect of the Scientific Text]. Rostov, 132 [in Russian].

Naidov, B. P. (1983). K probleme pragmatiki nauchno-tehnicheskogo teksta [On the Problem of Pragmatics of the Scientific and Technical Text]. Pragmaticheskie aspektyi izucheniya predlozheniya i teksta [Pragmatic aspects of the study of the sentence and the text]. Kiev, 87 92 [in Russian].

Nayer, V. L. (1981). Pragmaticheskiy aspekt angliyskogo gazetnogo teksta [Pragmatic Aspect of the English Newspaper]. Kommunikativnyie i pragmaticheskie osobennosti tekstov raznyih zhanrov [Communicative and pragmatic features of texts of different genres]. Moscow, 178, 106 116 [in Russian].

Susov, I. P. (1990). Semantika i pragmatika predlozheniya [Semantics and Pragmatics of the Sentence]. Kalinin, KSU, 50 [in Russian].

Taranenko, L. I. (2018). The Role of Prosodic Means in Decoding the Riddle Answer. Suchasni tendentsii fonetychnykh doslidzhen [Modern trends in phonetic research]. Kyiv, KPI, 42-44 [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2019-11-07