Conventional Implicatures in English-Based Literary Discourse: Triggers and Inference Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.02.026Abstract
Abstract. The paper focuses on the triggers of conventional implicatures referring to the human age description in English-based literary discourse. The study aims at identifying the conventional implicatures triggered by temporal adverbs in their age modifying functions. To achieve the purpose, the paper has applied the set of methods: the Grice's and neo-Gricean inferential pragmatics to inference conversational implicatures triggered by temporal adverbs; form / function pragmatics in elucidating conventionally embedded pragmatic meanings as well as some elements of stylistic and contextual interpretation analyses of a literary text.
The major findings refer to the identification of the most frequent adverbial modifiers triggering the conventional implicatures in the age-related narrations in English-based literary discourse. The identified triggers encompass the temporal adverbs still, just, suddenly and recently, which actualize the conventional implicatures due to their presuppositional component of "time continuance" correlating with age semes. The most frequent marker of embedded conventional meanings is the adverb still in its semantic components "so far" and "even if”.
Age-related conventional implicatures usually modify the age descriptors of appearance (with the implicature: “at that age, people usually don't look so good”) and behavior (with the implicature: at this age, people usually do not behave this way”). Much less frequent are conventional implicatures, associated with age-bound feelings or physical well-being.
The perspective of the undertaken research is the study of the conventional implicatures in the characters’ conversational speech of English-based literary discourse.
References
Ariel, M. (2012). Research paradigms in pragmatics. The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics In Allan, K. & Jaszczolt, K.M. (Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 23-45.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.003
Beaver, D. (1997). Presupposition. The handbook of logic and language. Van Benthem, J. & A. ter Meulen, A. (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 939-1008.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481714-3/50022-9
Beaver, D. (2001). Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. Stanford: CA: CSLI Publications.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226
Cunningham, M. (2000). The Hours. Picador Modern Classics.
Currie, G. (2006). "Why Irony is Pretence". The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretence, Possibility, and Fiction. Shaun Nichols (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 111-136.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275731.003.0007
Frapolli, M.J. & Fernandez, N.V. (2007). Inference markers and conventional implicatures. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy, 26 (2), 124-140.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts, 3, 41-58.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
Grice, H. P. (1991). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 78-79.
Kravchenko, N. & Yudenko, A. (2019). Communicative conventions and literary text: specifics of interplay. Science and Education: A New Dimension. Philology, VII (62), 211, 26-29.
https://doi.org/10.31174/SEND-Ph2019-211VII62-06
Kravchenko, N. (2017). Illocution of direct speech acts via conventional implicature and semantic presupposition. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The Journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open, II(1), 128-168.
https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2017-0004
Potts, C. (2007). Into the Conventional-Implicature Dimension. Philosophy Compass, 2(4), 665-679.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00089.x
Pratt, M. L. (1977). Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Recanati, F. (2003). Embedded Implicatures. Philosophical Perspectives, 17 (1), 299-332.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2003.00012.x
Salinger, J.D. (2018). The Catcher in the Rye. Penguin Books Ltd.
Searle, John R. (1985). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simons, M. (2001). On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In Proceedings of semantics and linguistics theory. Hastings, R., Jackson, B. & Zvolensky Z. (eds.). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, 431-448.
https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v11i0.3099
Steel, D. (2007). The House. A Del Book.
Sharvit, Y & Gajewski J. (2012). In Defense of the Grammatical Approach to Local Implicatures. Natural Language Semantics, 20 (1), 31-57.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
