Peculiarities of family roles distribution in the marrige subsystem

Authors

  • О. О. Oliinyk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog2020.03.057

Abstract

Changing the system of family values, views of the society on the significance and functioning of the family institution contribute to the transformation of marital role relationships in modern families. The already formed model of role interaction, the ability of spouses to define and clearly distribute family roles and to treat them responsibly is the important factors in building constructive marital relations and creating a favorable psychological climate in the family. Objective. The research deals with the analysis of the essence of the “family role” concept and the classification of family roles; experimental definition and analysis of the main types of family roles in marital relations. Methods. Theoretical research methods were used to solve the research problem:  analysis of scientific psychological literature, generalization method, systematization of scientific information. To solve the second part of the set objective, the empirical research methods were used, such as: conversation, psychodiagnostic method “Distribution of roles in the family” by Yu.Ye. Alioshyna, L.Ya. Hofman, O.M. Dubrovska, and also the method of processing and quantitative and qualitative interpretation of results. The research was conducted during September-October 2020. The study involved 11 married couples (husband and wife) with different marital experience of 22 people aged 25 to 47 years (Kyiv). All the couples have children aged 1 to 20 years. The results of an empirical study of the peculiarities of family roles distribution showed that the roles of entertainment organizer (63.64 %), master (mistress), (72.73 % and 63.64 %), the family subculture organizer (54, 55 % and 45.45 %) women and men share almost equally; the roles of educator and “psychotherapist” is more typical for women (90.91 % and 81.82 %); The role of sexual partner and the partner responsible for material support is more often performed by men (90.91 % and 72.73 %). The prospects for further research are seen in the study of role interaction in the parental families of adolescents and young people as a prerequisite for their future family roles.

References

Aleshina Yu. E. (2000) Tsikl razvitiya semi: issledovaniya i problema [Family development cycle: research and problem]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Psihologiya. Ser. 14, no. 2. рр. 60-72.

Bondarchuk O.I. (2005) Psykholohiia simi [Family psychology]. K.:MAUP (in Ukrainian).

Emishiants O.B. (2013) Vplyv rolovykh ochikuvan na zadovolenist shliubom [The influence of role expectations on marital satisfaction]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii Вook 1: Orhanizatsiina psykholohiia. Ekonomichna psykholohiia. Sotsialna psykholohiia. Vol. 37-38, рр. 364-368.

Karpova D.Ie. (2016) Psykholohichnyi analiz simeinykh rolei shliubnykh partneriv [Psychological analysis of family roles of marriage partners]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Psykholohichni nauky, Vol. 4, рр. 41-45.

Satir V. (2007) Vyi i vasha semya: Rukovodstvo po lichnostnomu rostu [You and your family: A guide to personal growth]. M.: Aprel-Press (in Russian).

Stoliarchuk O.A. (2015) Psykholohiia suchasnoi simi: navch. posib [Psychology of the modern family: a textbook]. Kremenchuk: PP Shcherbatykh O.V. (in Ukrainian).

Tseluyko V. M. (2004) Psihologiya sovremennoy semi [Psychology of the modern family]. M.:VLADOS (in Russian).

Iatsenko T. S. (2004) Teoriia i praktyka hrupovoi psykhokorektsii: aktyvne sotsialno-psykholohichne navchannia: navch. posib [Theory and practice of group psychocorrection: active social and psychological training: a textbook]. K.: Vyshcha shkola (in Ukrainian).

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Section

Article