Ownership as an interdisciplinary category
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/law2019.02.002Abstract
The urgency of the article is conditioned by the fact that the relation to the property is not static, the person, based on the sequence of evolutionary processes, tries to redefine a category such as «property» in a new way. That is why the category «property» in all its diversity is currently relevant. At the same time, it will be productive to consider ownership not only as a legal category with the use of a historical approach, but also its research from other perspectives, since it is the property, first and foremost, studied by philosophers and economists. The purpose of the paper is to confirm the «status» of property as an interdisciplinary category by expanding the field of study. In the process of research used scientific works of economists, lawyers, philosophers. The main methods used in the preparation of the article are the method of analysis and synthesis, the method of comparative analysis.
As a result of the study, the following conclusions were drawn: firstly, the general development of our society (on a human scale) is associated with property, all changes in the socio-economic life of a person and society are directly dependent on changes in property. The modern stage of development of a society based on the capitalist system only confirms this thesis, since its foundation is «three whales», one of which is private property; and secondly, property is the unity of philosophical, legal and economic aspects. Any study of the category of «property», within which discipline it would not be implemented, should take into account this fact, and only in this case, the study will be complete and scientifically substantiated; Thirdly, from a philosophical point of view, property, as a sign, is declared innate, given by nature, inherent in any person. Ownership is formulated as belonging to the relevant object to one or another person; fourthly, from a legal point of view property as a category expresses the rights of anyone to any property relations, expressed by the triad of powers: possession, use and disposal; fifth, from an economic point of view property as a category expresses the relation of different owners among themselves, as well as owners and direct producers of goods; sixthly, from a social point of view property as a category expresses the connection between personality and society, forms a person's sense of property in relation to objects of the material world, regardless of their subject identity.
Key words: ownership, property relations, philosophical category of ownership, legal category of ownership, economic category of ownership, social category of property.
References
Aristotel (1976). Sochineniya v chetyireh tomah. Tom 1 [Works in four volumes. Volume 1]. Red. V.F. Asmus. Moskva: Myisl, 560.
Aristotel (1983). Sochineniya v chetyireh tomah. Tom 4 [Works in four volumes. Volume 4]. Perev. i red. A.I. Dovatura. Moskva: Myisl, 830.
Atlas, M.S., Gryaznova, A.G., Checheleva, T.V. (1991). Osnovyi funktsionirovaniya ekonomicheskoy sistemyi: uchebnoe posobie dlya ekon. spets. vuzov [Fundamentals of the functioning of the economic system: a textbook for econ. specialist. universities ]. Moskva: Vyissh. shk., 231.
Afanaseva, I.G. (2012). Vzaimodeystvie lichnosti i obschestva kak sotsialnaya funktsiya sobstvennosti. Obschestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana) [The interaction of the individual and society as a social function of property. Society. Development (Terra Humana)], 4, 74–78.
Baykin, T.A. (2007). Obscheteoreticheskie problemyi pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy sobstvennosti [General theoretical problems of legal regulation of property relations]: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. Saratov, 192.
Berdyaev, N.A. Filosofiya neravenstva [Philosophy of Inequality]. Otv. red. O.A., Platonov. Moskva: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 624.
Gegel (1990). Filosofiya prava [Legal philosophy]. Moskva: Myisl, 524.
Gobbs, T. (1936). Leviafan ili Materiya, forma i vlast gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo [Leviathan or Matter, form and power of the state of the church and civil law]. Moskva: Sotsegiz, 503.
Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil law] (2005): uchebnik. V 3-h t. T. 1 Pod red. A.P., Sergeeva, Yu.K., Tolstogo. Moskva, 776.
Druzhinin, Yu.V. (1999). Otnosheniya sobstvennosti kak ob'ekt politiko-ekonomicheskogo issledovaniya [Property relations as an object of political and economic research ]: dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.01. Kostroma, 129.
Kant, I. (2000). Metafizika nravov. Nemetskaya klassicheskaya filosofiya [Metaphysics of manners. German classical philosophy]. T. 1. Pravo i svoboda. Moskva: EKSMO-Press, 784.
Kanyukov, S.K. (2002). Genezis prava sobstvennosti v kontekste rossiyskoy pravovoy traditsii [Genesis of property rights in the context of the Russian legal tradition]: dis. ... d-ra. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. Sankt-Peterburg, 398.
Karnyishev, A.D., Burmenko, T.D., Ivanova, E.A. (2006). Chelovek i sobstvennost [Human and the property]: uchebnoe posobie. Moskva, 349.
Marks, K., Engels, F. Sochineniya [Works]. 2-e izd. T. 46. Ch. I. 972.
Pilipenko, V.E., Gansova E.A., Kazakov V.S. (2002). Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic sociology]: uch. posob. Pod red. V.E., Pilipenko. Kiev: MAUP, 296.
Prudon, P.Zh. (1996). «Chto takoe sobstvennost?» ili «Issledovanie o printsipe prava i vlasti» [What is property? Or Study on the principle of law and power]. Moskva, 190.
Sergeev, A.A. (2000). Munitsipalnaya sobstvennost v sisteme ekonomicheskih otnosheniy [Municipal property in the system of economic relations]: dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.01. Kostroma, 143.
Sillaste, G.G. (2005). Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic sociology]. Moskva: Gardariki, 383.
Sklovskiy, K.I. (2000). Sobstvennost v grazhdanskom prave [Property in civil law]. Moskva: Delo, 512.
Smirnova, O.I. (2002). Sobstvennost kak vseobschiy sotsialno-ekonomicheskiy institut: Stanovlenie, protivorechiya, razvitie [Ownership as a universal socio-economic institute: Formation, contradictions, development]: dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk. Moskva: RGB, 162.
Solovev, V.S. (2012). Opravdanie dobra [Justification of wellnes ]. Otv. red. O.A., Platonov. Moskva: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, Algoritm, 656.
Sugar Dulam (2012). Filosofskie, ekonomicheskie, aksiologicheskie i yuridicheskie nachala izucheniya sobstvennosti kak sotsialno-pravovoy tsennosti [Philosophical, economic, axiological and legal principles of the study of property as a social and legal value]. Pravo i zakonodatelstvo, 4. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/filosofskie-ekonomicheskie-aksiologicheskie-i-yuridicheskie-nachala-izucheniya-sobstvennosti-kak-sotsialno-pravovoy-tsennosti.
Sugar Dulam (2015). Sobstvennost kak pravovaya tsennost (teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie) [Property as a legal value (theoretical and legal research)]: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. Moskva, 211.
Frank, S.L. (1992). Duhovnyie osnovyi obschestva [Spiritual foundations of society]. Moskva, 512.
Hubiev, K.A. (1988). Sobstvennost v sisteme proizvodstvennyih otnosheniy [Ownership in a production relationship system]. Moskva: Izd-vo MGU, 168.
Shkredov, V.P. (1967). Ekonomika i pravo. O printsipah issledovaniya proizvodstvennyih otnosheniy v svyazi s yuridicheskoy formoy ih vyirazheniya. [Economy and law. On the principles of the study of industrial relations in connection with the legal form of their expression]. Moskva: Ekonomika, 189.
Ekonomika (klyuchevyie voprosyi) [Economics (key questions)] (2004): uchebnoe posobie. Pod red. V.P., Ocheredko. SPb., 633.
Ekonomicheskaya Entsiklopediya. Politicheskaya ekonomiya [Economic Encyclopedia. Political Economy] (1979). Pod red. A.M., Rumyantseva. Moskva: «Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya», 3, 624.
Yakobson, L.I. (1996). Ekonomika obschestvennogo sektora. Osnovyi teorii gosudarstvennyih finansov [Economy in the civil sector. Fundamentals of Public Finance Theory]. Moskva: Aspekt Press, 133.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
