Productivity of rainbow trout depending on protein levels in productive feed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/animal2020.04.045Keywords:
commercial rainbow trout, fish feeding, combined feed, protein, economic efficiencyAbstract
The article considers the efficiency of using complete feeds with different levels of protein in rearing commercial rainbow trout. The purpose of the experiment was to establish the effect of different protein levels in nutrition of two-year old trout on its productivity. For this purpose, five experimental groups were formed by the method of analogues. During the equalizing period, the experimental fish consumed feed of the control group. In the main period, the protein level in trout feed ranged from 44 to 52 % per 1 kg. As a result of the studies it was established that the increase of protein content in compound feed from 48 to 52 % leads to an increase in the weight of commercial fish by 13.0 % (p < 0.001), an increase in its growth intensity – by 7.4-16.7 %, while the reduction of protein in feed to 44 % leads to a reliable (p < 0.05) reduction in trout weight by 9.4 %, and a decrease in its growth intensity - by 6.5-12.1 %. It is proved that different levels of experimental trout’s protein nutrition have a highly reliable (p < 0.001) effect on the growth of marketable fish - the share of this factor’s influence is 89.8 %. Analysis of the feed costs, proves that using combined feed with 52 % protein for feeding two-year old trout, leads to a decrease in feed costs per 1 kg of weight gain by 5.1 %, whereas reducing this index to 44% causes increase of feed costs by 6.4 % per a unit of product, compared to feeding fish with production feed having the protein content of 48 %. At this, the preservation of experimental fish was high enough and made 94.3 to 96.2 %. In rearing trouts according to the criteria of maximum productivity, it is recommended to feed commercial trout with production combined feeds with the protein level of 52 %, whereas, in production according to the economic optimization criteria, this index should make 48 %.
References
Yehorov, B. V., Fihurska, L. V. (2011). Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku forelivnytstva u rybovodnykh hospodarstvakh Ukrainy [Status and prospects of trout development in fish farms of Ukraine]. Zernovi produkty i kombikormy. 2. 37-39. (in Ukrainian)
Ynstruktsyia po razvedenyiu raduzhnoi forely [Instructions for breeding rainbow trout] (1985). Moscow. VNYYPRKh. 59. (in Russian)
Plokhynskyi, N. A. (1969). Rukovodstvo po byometryy dlia zootekhnykov [Biometrics guide for zootechnicians]. Moscow. Kolos. 246. (in Russian)
SOU 05.01.-37-385:2006. Voda rybogospodarskyx pidpryyemstv. Zagalni vymogy ta normy [Water of fishery enterprises. General requirements and norms]. Kyiv. Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine. 15. (in Ukrainian)
Sherman, I. M., Hrynzhevskyi, M. V., Zheltov, Yu. O. (2002). Naukove obhruntuvannia ratsionalnoi hodivli ryb: uchebnoe posobye [Scientific substantiation of rational feeding of fishes: Textbook]. Kyiv Vyshcha osvita. 128. (in Ukrainian)
Shcherbyna M. A., Hamyhyn E. A. (2006). Kormlenye ryb v presnovodnoi akvakulture [Feeding fish in freshwater aquaculture]. Moscow. VNYRO. 360. (in Russian)
Cowey, C. B. (1992). Nutrition: estimating requirements of rainbow trout. Aquaculture. 100. 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(92)90370-Z
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2016). El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura. Contribución a la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición para todos. Roma: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 224.
Jobling, M. (2016). Fish nutrition research: Past, present and future. Aquaculture International. 24. 767-786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-014-9875-2
Karabulut, H. A., Yandi, I., Aras, N. M. (2010). Effects of different feed and temperature conditions on growth, meat yield, survival rate, feed conversion ratio and condition factor in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fingerlings. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 9(22). 2818-2823. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.2818.2823
Khan, K., Rodrigues, А., Cleber, M. et al. (2019). Dietary protein quality and proper protein to energy ratios: a bioeconomic approach in aquaculture feeding practices. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research. 47(2). 232-239. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol47-issue2-fulltext-3
Kim, J. D., Кaushik, S. J. (1992). Contribution of digestible energy from carbohydrates and estimation of protein/energy requirements for growth of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture. 106 (2). 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(92)90200-5
Mahmud, S., Chakraborty, S. C., Das, M. (1996). Performance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed on different dietary protein with fixed energy. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 9(1). 31-35. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1996.31
Takeuchi, T., Yokoyama, M., Watanabe, T., Ogino, C. (1978). Optimum ratio of dietary energy to protein for rainbow. Trout Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries. 44 (7). 729-732. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.44.729
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).