Doxycycline intake and distribution in the body of broiler chickens with ornithobacteriosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/ujvs2021.01.001Keywords:
Key words, poledoxin, doxycycline hyclact, broiler chickens, ornithobactriosis, Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale, pharmacokinetics, distribution, accumulation, excretionAbstract
Abstract. The clinical efficiency of the antibiotic is determined by its distribution in organs and tissues, the ability to penetrate the physiological and pathological barriers of the body. The article presents the results from a study of the intake, distribution, and excretion of doxycycline hyclate – the active substance of the antibiotic pollodoxin from the body of broiler chickens (the Cobb-500 cross) with ornithobacteriosis.
It has been established that 24 hours after the pollodoxin solution application in broiler chickens with ornithobacteriosis, the highest content of its active substance (doxycycline hyclate) was found in the lungs, liver, slightly less – in the kidneys, and least – in the heart and pectoral muscles. After 48 and 72 hours, the content of doxycycline hyclate increases in the liver, kidneys, heart, and pectoral muscles compared to 24 hours, while in the lungs decreases slightly after 48 hours and does not differ from it after 72 hours. At 96 hours, the content of doxycycline hyclate in the kidneys, lungs, and pectoral muscles reaches maximum values; in the liver it is smaller than the previous one (72 hours), while in the heart it does not differ from it. Doxycycline hyclate does not show cumulative properties and “organ affiliation” during 96 hours of entry into the body of broiler chickens with ornithobacteriosis. After 24 hours of discontinuation of pollodoxin use (120 hours of the experiment), the content of doxycycline hyclate in all studied organs decreases but remains high enough, indicating a relatively long elimination half-life and antimicrobial action. Pharmacokinetic indicators will allow the doctor to determine an effective drug that will provide a therapeutic effect and will prevent the development of resistance of microorganisms.
Keywords: pollodoxin, doxycycline hyclate, broiler chickens, ornithobacteriosis, Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale, pharmacokinetic parameters
References
Agwuh, K. N., & MacGowan, A. (2006). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the tetracyclines including glycylcyclines. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 58, 256-265. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl224
Ambrose, P. G., Bhavnani, S. M., Rubino, C. M., Louie, A., Gumbo, T., Forrest, A., & Drusano, G. L. (2007). Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy: it's not just for mice anymore. Clinical Infection Diseases Journal, 44, 79-86. doi: 10.1086/510079
Anadón, A., Martinez‐Larrañaga, M. R., Diaz, M., Bringas, J. P., Fernandez, M. C., Fernandez-Cruz, M. L., Iturbe, J., & Martinez, M. A. (1994). Pharmacokinetics of doxycycline in broiler сhickens. Avian Pathology, 23(1), 79-90. doi: 10.1080/03079459408418976
Bailey, C., Spielmeyer, A., & Hamscher, G. (2016). The veterinary antibiotic journey: comparing the behaviour of sulfadiazine, sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline in cow excrement and two soils. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16, 1690-1704. doi: 10.1007/s11368-016-1370-0
Bousquet, E., Morvan, H., & Aitken, I. (1997). Comparative in vitro activity of doxycycline and oxytetracycline against porcine respiratory pathogens. The Veterinary record, 141(2), 37-40. doi: 10.1136/vr.141.2.37
Barbosa, E. V., Cardoso, C. V., Silva, R., Cerqueira, A., Liberal, M., & Castro, H. (2020). Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale: an update review about an emerging poultry pathogen. Veterinary Science, 7(1), 1-13. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7010003
Cazer, C. L., Volkova, V. V., & Gröhn, Y. T. (2014). Use of pharmacokinetic modeling to assess antimicrobial pressure on enteric bacteria of beef cattle fed chlortetracycline for growth promotion, disease control, or treatment. Foodborne pathogens and disease, 11(5), 403-411. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1677
Croubels, S., Baert, K., & Busser, P. (1998) Residue study of doxycycline and 4-epidoxycycline in pigs medicated via drinking water. The Analyst, 23(12),2733-2736. doi: 10.1039/a804936j.
Ellakany, H. F., Elbestawy, A. R., Abd-Elhamid, H. S., Gado, A. R., Nassar, A. A., Abdel-Latif, M. A., … & Alowaimer, A. (2019). Effect of experimental Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection along with live infectious bronchitis vaccination in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 98(1), 105-111. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey324
Fairchild, A. S., Smith, J. L., Idris, U., Lu, J., Sanchez, S., Purvis, L. B., ... & Lee, M. D. (2005). Effects of orally administered tetracycline on the intestinal community structure of chickens and on tet determinant carriage by commensal bacteria and Campylobacter Jejuni. Applied and environmental microbiology, 71(10), 5865-5872. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.5865-5872.2005
Gajda, A., Posyniak, A., & Tomczyk, G. (2014). LC–MS/MS analysis of doxycycline residues in chicken tissues after oral administration. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, 58(4), 573-579. doi: 10.2478/bvip-2014-0089
Ho, Y. B., Zakaria, M., Latif, P. A., & Saari, N. (2014). Occurrence of veterinary antibiotics and progesterone in broiler manure and agricultural soil in Malaysia. The Science of the total environment, 488, 261-267.
Kramer, P. A., Chapron, D. J., Benson, J., & Mercik, S. A. (1978). Tetracycline absorption in elderly patients with achlorhydria. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 23(4), 467-472. doi: 10.1002/cpt1978234467
Mayahi, M., Gharibi, D., & Ghadimipour, R. (2016). Isolation, identification and antimicrobial sensitivity of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in broilers chicken flocks of Khuzestan, Iran. Veterinary Research Forum, 7(4), 341-346.
Mestorino, O. N., Zeinsteger, P. A., Buchamer, A. V., Buldain, D. C., Aliverti, F., & Marchetti, M. L. (2018). Tissue depletion of doxycycline after its oral administration in food producing chicken for fattening. International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology, 3. doi: 10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00095
Mileva, R., & Milanova, A. (2020). Doxycycline pharmacokinetics in mammalian species of veterinary interest – an overview. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine. Online first, 3-20. doi: 10.15547/bjvm.2321
Oca-Jimenez, R. M., Vega-Sanchez, V., Morales-Erasto, V., Salgado-Miranda, C., Blackall, P., & Soriano-Vargas, E. (2018). Phylogenetic relationship of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale strains. The Journal of veterinary medical science, 80(6), 869-873. doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0474
Ochsendorf, F. (2010). Minocycline in acne vulgaris: benefits and risks. American journal of clinical dermatology, 11, 327-341. doi: 10.2165/11319280-000000000-00000
Papich, M. G., Fortier, L. A., & Davidson, G. S. (2013). Doxycycline concentration over time after storage in a compounded veterinary preparation. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 12, 1674-1678. doi: 10.2460/javma.242.12.1674
Roberts, M., & Chopra, I. (2001). Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews, 65, 232-260. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.2.232-260.2001
Sanders, P., Henri, J., Laurentie, M., & Sanders, P. (2016). Tools to evaluate pharmacokinetics data for establishing maximum residue limits for approved veterinary drugs: examples from JECFA’s work. Drug testing and analysis, 8, 565-571. doi: 10.1002/dta.2006.
Smith, K., & Leyden, J. (2005). Safety of doxycycline and minocycline: a systematic review. Clinical Therapeutics, 27, 1329-1342.
Szabó, R., Wehmann, E., Makrai, L., Nemes, C., Gyuris, É., Thuma, Á., & Magyar, T. (2017). Characterization of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale field isolates from Hungary. Avian Pathology, 46(5), 506-514. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2017.1321104
Tyshkivska, A., Dukhnitsky, V., & Tyshkivsky, M. (2020). Intake and distribution of doxycycline in the organism of broiler chickens. Scientific Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2020 (2), 158-165. doi: 10.33245/2310-4902-2020-160-2-158-165
Widyasari-Mehta, A., Suwito, H. R. K. A., & Kreuzig, R. (2016). Laboratory testing on the removal of the veterinary antibiotic doxycycline during long-term liquid pig manure and digestate storage. Chemosphere, 149, 154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.094
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
