Ontology of boundaries in contemporary land management: from geometry to regimes of rights and values
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2025.03.0%25pKeywords:
boundary, spatial ontology, land management, LADM, institutional regimes, rights and restrictions, 3D/4D cadastre, interoperability, value capture, spatial governanceAbstract
The paper reconceptualizes the boundary in contemporary land management as an institutional–regime category that transcends the geometric view of a dividing line. Drawing on comparative-historical and institutional analysis, deontic modeling, and formal ontologization via LADM, it substantiates a shift from a material-geometric to a regime-based ontology of space, where the boundary operates as an event-relation constituting rights, restrictions, liabilities, and rent flows. Four structural levels—material, legal, informational, and ecological—are identified, and their supervenient couplings are explicated, showing how procedural and data validity causally ground the legitimacy of spatial regimes. The paper formulates principles of boundary ontological design (constitutiveness of procedure, multimodality, adaptability, quality metrics, compatibility and priorities, value transparency) enabling the integration of legal norms, spatial data, and land-value governance mechanisms. Practical relevance includes a transition from a “registry of lines” to a dynamic regime model of space for cadastral and planning systems, improving decision quality, reducing conflicts, and enabling transparent value sharing. The study positions itself as a contribution to the formation of land management theory as a foundational discipline and outlines follow-up work on regime formalization, GeoBIM integration, and legitimacy assessment procedures.
Keywords: boundary; spatial ontology; land management; LADM; institutional regimes; rights and restrictions; 3D/4D cadastre; interoperability; value capture; spatial governance.
References
1. Slanski, K. E. (2003). The Babylonian Entitlement Narûs (Kudurrus). Journal of Cuneiform Studies. Available at: https://www.bu.edu/asor/pubs/jcs/52/slanski.pdf
2. Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary (Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum). (2000). London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies. Available at: https://www.powells.com/book/writings-of-the-roman-land-surveyors-9780907764281
3. Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Agrimensorum_Romanorum
4. Jones, M. J. (2018). Domesday Book: An early fiscal, accounting narrative? Accounting History Review. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890838917300628
5. Domesday and Taxation. (n.d.). Oxford Academic. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/book/33115/chapter/283464476
6. UK Parliament. (n.d.). Enclosing the Land. Available at: https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/towncountry/landscape/overview/enclosingland/
7. Oxford Centre for Global History. (n.d.). Enclosing the English Commons: Property, Productivity and Power. Available at: https://globalcapitalism.history.ox.ac.uk/files/case26-enclosingtheenglishcommonspdf
8. Degrave, A. (2024). Evidence from the French Napoleonic Cadaster. TSE Working Paper. Available at: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2024/wp_tse_1530.pdf
9. 15th September 1807: the Napoleonic land registry was created. (n.d.). Available at: https://napoleon-en-seineetmarne.fr/en/15th-september-1807-napoleonic-land-registry-was-created
10. Department for Infrastructure and Transport (South Australia). (n.d.). Indefeasibility (Torrens Title). Available at: https://www.dhud.sa.gov.au/what-we-do/ORG/land-titling/indefeasibility
11. Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land Administration for Sustainable Development. FIG/ESRI Press. Available at: https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/otherpub/Land_Administration_for_Sustainable_Development.pdf
12. Williamson, I. (2001). The Evolution of Modern Cadastres. Proc. FIG. Available at: https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/korea/full-papers/pdf/session6/williamson.pdf
13. Tomlinson, R. (1967). An Introduction to the Geo-Information System of the Canada Land Inventory. Available at: https://www.geostrategis.com/CLI-reports/CGIS-Tomlinson-1967.pdf
14. Esri. (2012). Origins of the Canada Geographic Information System. ArcNews. Available at: https://www.esri.com/news/arcnews/fall12articles/origins-of-the-canada-geographic-information-system.html
15. USGS. (n.d.). Landsat Missions. Available at: https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions
16. NASA/GSFC. (n.d.). Landsat Science — History. Available at: https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/satellites/history/
17. UNECE. (1996). Land Administration Guidelines (ECE/HBP/96). Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/hlm/documents/Publications/land.administration.guidelines.e.pdf
18. UNECE. (2005). Land Administration in the UNECE Region: Development Trends 1996–2005. Available at: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/hlm/documents/Publications/landadmin.devt.trends.e.pdf
19. FAO. (2012). Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests. Available at: https://www.fao.org/4/i2801e/i2801e.pdf
20. UNCCD/FAO. (2022). Technical Guide on the Integration of the VGGT. Available at: https://www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/2022-05/cb9656en.pdf
21. ISO. (2012). ISO 19152:2012 Geographic information — Land Administration Domain Model (LADM). Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/51206.html
22. ISO. (2024–2025). ISO 19152-1:2024…-5:2025 Geographic information — LADM (2nd ed.). Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/
23. FIG. (2024). News: ISO LADM Edition II. Available at: https://www.fig.net/news/news_2024/02_ISO-ladm-II.asp
24. FIG. (2018). FIG Publication No. 72. Best Practices 3D Cadastres. Available at: https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/FIG_3DCad/FIG_3DCad-final.pdf
25. van Oosterom, P. (2018). 3D Cadastral Information Modelling. Available at: https://research.utwente.nl/files/31027705/Oosterom2018cadastral.pdf
26. Stoter, J. (2012). The Phased 3D Cadastre Implementation in the Netherlands. Proc. FIG 3D Cadastre. Available at: https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/2012/2012_3dcadastre/3Dcad_2012_42.pdf
27. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics. Available at: https://www.sfu.ca/~wainwrig/Econ400/coase-socialcost.pdf
28. Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review. Available at: https://www.shastriinstitute.org/sites/default/files/Demsetz_Property_Rights.pdf
29. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://archive.org/details/governingcommons0000ostr
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Землеустрій, кадастр і моніторинг земель
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
