Border handling as the most correct dynamic principle of the beginning of the register of immovable cultural heritage development

Authors

  • V. Chabaniuk Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine , Інститут географії Національної академії наук України
  • O. Dyshlyk Geomatic Solutions LLC , ТОВ "Геоматичні рішення"
  • K. Polyvach Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine , Інститут географії Національної академії наук України
  • V. Pioro NGO "Ukrainian Center for Museum Development" , ГО «Український центр розвитку музейної справи»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2021.01.07

Abstract

The correct start of work on developing a spatial data infrastructure of the domain of immovable cultural heritage (CH) of Ukraine is to model the entities boundaries of the CH in the most accessible way at the moment. Created models are used together with the necessary transformations, both in separate systems from the set of CH domain systems, and in several appropriately ordered systems from this set. Many of the required systems are organized into a hierarchy of systems called Atlas Geographic Information System: from public models of CH entities on the Internet to the State System for permanent registration or registration of CH objects under the Ministry of Culture and Information Policy (MCIP) of Ukraine. Border management includes support for the entire life cycle of the spatial characteristics of CH entity models – from random statement about the CH object to the transformation into an object of the registration system or even an object of the national register. It is shown that when defining boundaries, you need to be able to work with different spatial characterizations of the CH object. It is proved that this characterization can be started from available cartographic material, and not from the implementation of land management projects, as it is done in the case of spatial characterization of land parcels. The elements of the methodology are described, which allows to carry out the necessary spatial characterization of the CH objects in practice.

Key words: spatial characterization of immovable cultural heritage objects, NSDI, methods of border management, relational cartography, conceptual framework, solutions framework.

Author Biographies

  • V. Chabaniuk, Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Інститут географії Національної академії наук України
    Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
  • O. Dyshlyk, Geomatic Solutions LLC, ТОВ "Геоматичні рішення"
    Executive Director
  • K. Polyvach, Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Інститут географії Національної академії наук України
    Candidate of Geographical Sciences
  • V. Pioro, NGO "Ukrainian Center for Museum Development", ГО «Український центр розвитку музейної справи»
    Chairman of the Board

References

ACT of 4 March 2010 on spatial information infrastructure. Available at: (http://ggim.un.org/knowledgebase/Attachment272.aspx?AttachmentType=1).

ANZLIC, (1996) National Spatial Data Infrastructure for Australia and New Zealand, Canberra

Chabaniuk, V.S., Dyshlyk, O.P. (2016). Atlas Basemaps in Web 2.0 Epoch.- The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLI-B4, 2016 XXIII ISPRS Congress, 12-19 July 2016. Prague (Czech Republic), 611-618.

https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B4-611-2016

Chabaniuk, V.S., Rudenko, L.G., González, R.M., Donert, K. ed. Relational geospatial technologies: background theory, practical example and needs in education, in Geospatial Technologies in Geography Education. Koutsopoulos Kostis, Springer, 219.

Cresswell, T. (2013). Geographic Thought: A Critical Introduction (Critical Introductions to Geography). Wiley-Blackwell, 298 .

Map Marker. Available at: https://www.mapmarker.app/.

Rajabifard, A., Binns, A., Masser, I., Williamson, I.P. The role of sub-na¬tional government and the private sector in future SDIs. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20 (7), 727-741.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810500432224

Steudler, D., Rajabifard, A. ed. (2014). Spatially Enabled Society. FIG report No. 58. The International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), 68-72.

Steudler, D., ed. (2014). CADASTRE 2014 and Beyond. FIG report No. 61. The International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), 73-84.

Wikipedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Container_space.

Bugaevskii, L.M., Tsvetkov, V.Ja. (2000). Geoinformazionnye sistemy: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov [Geoinformation systems: study guide for universities]. Moscow, Russia: Zlatoust, 222.

Dyshlyk, O.P., Markov, S.Ju., Chabaniuk, V.S. (2003). Karkas georishen' jak sposib pobudovy natsional'noi infrastruktury geoprostorovyh danyh [The framework of geosolutions as a way to build a national infrastructure of geospatial data]. Research and technology collection: Engineering geodesy, 49. Kyiv: KNUBiA, 73-94.

Dyshlyk, O.P., Dorosh, A.Y., Tarnopolskyi, A.V., Tarnopolskyi, E.A. (2018). Infrastructura geoprostorovyh danyh v Ukraini: Stan ta metodologichni problemy zakonodavchogo regulyuvannya [Infrastructure of geospatial data in Ukraine: State and methodological problems of legislative regulation]. Land management, cadastre and land monitoring, 1, 33-43.

https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2018.01.004

Jos, A. M. (2017). Metodychni pidhody do vstanovlennya mezh isnuyuchyh objective PZF Ukrainy [Methodical approaches to establishing the boundaries of existing NRF facilities in Ukraine]. Materials of scientific-practical seminar. Series: «Conservation Biology in Ukraine», 1. Kyiv, 240.

Klasyficator informazii, yaka vidobrazhaet'sya na topografichnyh kartah masshtabiv 1:10,000, 1:25,000, 1:50,000, 1:100,000, 1:200,000, 1:500,000, 1:1,000,000 (1998) [Classifier of information displayed on topographic maps at scales of 1:10,000, 1:25,000, 1:50,000, 1:100,000, 1:200,000, 1:500,000, 1:1,000,000]. GUGKK , 53.

Standartyzaziya metadanyh ta obminu danymy v konteksta stvorennya elektronnogo informaziynogo resursu objektiv kulturnoi spadschyny ta culturnyh zinnostey (2017) [Standardization of metadata and data exchange in the context of creating an electronic information resource of cultural heritage sites and cultural values]. UTSKD, SRN 0117U006630, 303.

Novikov, A.M., Novikov, D.A. (2007). Methodology. Moscow, Russia: SINTEG, 668.

Petrovska, O.P. (1986). Border, boundary. Kultura slova, 30. Linguistic Institute named for O.O. Potebni. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 103.

Pro Derzhavnyy zemelnyy kadastr № 3613-VI (2012). Vidomosti Verhovnoi Rady, 8. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3613-17.

Pro zemleustriy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 22 travnia 2003 roku za № 858-IV (2003). Vidomosti Verhovnoi Rady, 36. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/858-15.

Pro nazionalnu infrastructuru geoprostotovyh danyh: Zakon Ukrainy №554-IX (2020). Vidomosti Verhovnoi Rady, 37. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/554-20#Text.

Public map of Ukraine. Available at: https://map.land.gov.ua/kadastrova-karta.

Rudenko, L.G., Polyvach, K.A., Chabaniuk, V.S. (2018). Kulturna spadschyna v Atlasniy geoinformaziyniy systemi stalogo rozvytku Ukrainy [Cultural heritage in Atlas geoinformation system of sustainable development of Ukraine]. Institute of geography NANU. Kyiv, 172.

Tarnopolskyi, A.V., Malashevskyy, М.А., Tarnopolskyi, E.A., Palamar, A.Ju. (2018). Deyaki aspekty pobudovy infrastructury geoprostorovyh danyh [Some aspects of building a geospatial data infrastructure]. Molodyy vchenyy, 2 (54), 28-31.

Holl, J., Chabaniuk, V.S., Berezhna, N.V. (1998). Programne zab-ezpechennya shvydkoi reyestrazii prav vlasnosti: praktychnyy pidhid [Software for quick registration of property rights: a practical approach]. Visnyk geodezii ta kartografii, 3, 46-53.

Chabaniuk, V.S. (2018). Relyaziyna kartografiya: Teoriya I praktyka [Relational cartography: Theory and practice]. Institute of geography NANU. Kyiv, 525.

Published

2021-03-03

Issue

Section

Topographic and Geodetic and Сartographic Support in Land Management