Public-private partnership: opportunities for Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2024.04.02Keywords:
economic mechanism, point of development stagnation, public-private partnership, rural territories, synergetic effectAbstract
The urgent necessity to reform the state sector of economy, to recover infrastructural objects, to attract foreign investments to Ukrainian economy, and to establish socially focused economy substantiates the great importance of development of the partnership relations between the public and private individuals (public-private partnership). Efficiency of such relations mainly depends on efficiency of legal regulation and development of organizational-economic structure. According to the law of Ukraine “About state-private partnership”, which principally regulates that kind of cooperation, the appropriate mechanism expects cooperation between the public, territorial (state partners) and legal (except for the state and communal enterprises) or private individuals, i.e. entrepreneurs (private partners). Focus of the mechanism on cooperation with territorial communities actualizes it because of a fast move of the power decentralization reform in Ukraine. At the level of a separate territorial community, practical application of any form of PPP requires from the representatives of local power to master legal, economic, social-communicative skills for initiation of the partnership (introduction of proposals and analysis of efficiency of the proposed projects), choice of private partners (one or several) and making agreements with them. Within such partnership, bodies of the state power or local self-government transfer a share of their authorities to a private partner (single or a group of them). Thus, private partnership (an individual or an enterprise) is responsible for implementation of the project, which aims at solution of some social-economic or ecological problems of the territorial community.
Key words: economic mechanism, point of development stagnation, public-private partnership, rural territories, synergetic effect.
References
Martinova, N. O. (2014). Use of the European models of local partnerships in the field of rural development and its adaptation to national legislation [Vykorystannia ievropejs'kykh modelej lokal'noho partnerstva u sferi rozvytku sil's'kykh terytorij ta ikh adaptatsiia do natsional'noho zakonodavstva]. Current Problems of State and Law, 72, 274–279.
Peters, B. G. (1998). With a little help from our friends’: public-private partnerships as institutions and instruments. In Partnerships in urban governance: European and American experiences. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 11-33.
Bovaird, T. (2004). Public-private partnerships: from contested concepts to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70 (2), 199–215. doi: 10.1177/00208523040442.
Kwak, Y. H., Chih, Y., Ibbs, C. W. (2009). Towards a comprehensive understanding of public private partnerships for infrastructure development. California Management Review, 51 (2), 51–78. doi: 10.2307/41166480/
Hodge, G. A., Greve, C. (2007). Public-private partnerships: an international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67 (3), 545–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x.
Sorensen, E., Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through Metgovernance. Public Administration, 87 (2), 234–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x.
Christopoulos, S., Horvath, B., Kull, M. (2012). Advancing the governance of cross‐sectoral policies for sustainable development: A metgovernance perspective. Public Administration and Development, 32 (3), 305–323. doi: 10.1002/pad.1629.
LaFrance, J., Lehmann, M. (2005). Corporate awakening - why (some) corporations embrace public-private partnerships. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14 (4), 216–229. doi: 10.1002/bse.471.
Glasbergen, P., Biermann, F., Mol, A.P. (Eds.). (2007). Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 328.
Rohova, O. V. (2012). Innovative approaches to interpretation of the concept of public-private partnership [Innovatsijni pidkhody do traktuvannia poniattia «publichno-pryvatne partnerstvo»]. Journal of Dnipropetrovsk University, 6 (3), 206–212.
Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: the emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster, 376.
Bar-Yam, Y., McKay, S. R., Christian, W. (1998). Dynamics of Complex Systems (Studies in Nonlinearity). Computers in Physics, 12 (4), 335–336. doi: 10.1063/1.4822633.
Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: history and issues. Emergence, 1 (1), 49–72. doi: 10.1207/s15327000em0101_4.
Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99 (394), 116–131. doi: 10.2307/2234208.
Anderies, J., Janssen, M., Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society, 9 (1), 18. doi: 10.5751/ES-00610-090118.
Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24 (3), 347–364. doi: 10.1191/030913200701540465.
Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Emergent complex systems. Futures, 26 (6), 568–582. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90029-9.
Kaufman, A. S. (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 709. doi: 10.1142/9789814415743_0003.
Levin, S. A. (2005). Self-organization and the emergence of complexity in ecological systems. Bioscience, 5 (12), 1075–1079. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[1075:SATEOC]2.0.CO;2.
Prigogine, I. (1987). Exploring complexity. European Journal of Operational Research, 30, 97–103. doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90085-3.
Sardar, Z., Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Complexity: fad or future? Futures, 26 (6), 1–5. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90028-0.
Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. New York: Addison-Wesley, 865.
Ambrosio-Albala, M., Bastiaensen, J. (2010). The new territorial paradigm of rural development: theoretical foundations from systems and institutional theories. Belgium: University of Antwerp, 67.
Haan, J. (2006). How emergence arises. Ecological Complexity, 3, 293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003.
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press, 224. doi: 10.3998/mpub.10029.
The Law of Ukraine “About State-Private Partnership” (2010). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2404-17.
Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine. Available at: http://www.me.gov.ua/Documents/Detail?lang=uk-UA&id=c2948231-0ac9-471a-b77b-f298ccb78c52&title=InformatsiinoanalitichniMaterialiSchodoInvestitsiinogoKlimatuVUkrainiZa2017-Rik.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
