Towards a contemporary theory of land management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2025.04.02Keywords:
land management theory, spatial land-use regimes, boundaries and borders, spatial value, axiomatic framework of land management, land administration methodology, digital cadastre, institutional design, spatial governanceAbstract
The paper develops the normative core of contemporary land management theory as an autonomous foundational discipline that transcends the narrow techno-practical view of “parcel processing” and is framed as a science of governing spatial value. Building on a critical review of the international land administration paradigm, Ukrainian doctrinal contributions, institutional theory, property-rights theory, and spatial economics, the study refines the object and subject of land management: the object is defined as a multidimensional socio-spatial continuum in which territory is transformed into an ordered space of rights, restrictions, regimes, rents, and risks; the subject is the emergence, structure, and dynamics of land-use regimes as systems of legal titles, servitudes, zones, corridors, and reservations in a multi-layer (surface–subsurface–airspace) and multi-temporal configuration. An axiomatic core of contemporary land management theory is articulated. It is shown that its methodology must encompass institutional analysis, doctrinal legal reasoning on spatial regimes, spatial-economic rent modelling, topological and network approaches, environmental accounting, geoinformation and algorithmic modelling, scenario analysis, and procedures of spatial justice. The paper systematizes the kernel of scientific problems in land management theory whose resolution is a precondition for moving from fragmented normative–technical practice to institutionally mature spatial governance. The practical significance of the results lies in providing a conceptual framework for updating curricula, improving cadastral and planning systems, and designing standards for governing spatial value under conditions of digitalization and the growing importance of spatial justice.
Keywords: land management theory; spatial land-use regimes; boundaries and borders; spatial value; axiomatic framework of land management; land administration methodology; digital cadastre; institutional design; spatial governance.
References
1. Dale, P., & McLaughlin, J. (2000). Land administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://global.oup.com
2. Williamson, I. P., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land administration for sustainable development. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press Academic. Available at: https://esripress.esri.com
3. Bennett, R., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. (2008). Organising land information for sustainable land administration. Land Use Policy, 25(1), 126–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.03.006
4. Enemark, S., Williamson, I., & Wallace, J. (2005). Building modern land administration systems in developed economies. Journal of Spatial Science, 50(2), 51–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2005.9635042
5. Kaufmann, J., & Steudler, D. (1998). Cadastre 2014 – A vision for a future cadastral system. FIG. Available at: https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/cadastre2014.pdf
6. Steudler, D. (Ed.). (2014). Cadastre 2014 and beyond (FIG Publication No. 61). Copenhagen: FIG. Available at: https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub61/figpub61.pdf
7. International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO 19152:2012 Geographic information — Land Administration Domain Model (LADM). Geneva: ISO. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/51206.html
8. Oosterom, P. J. M., & Lemmen, C. (2015). The Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Motivation, standardisation, application and further development. Land Use Policy, 49, 527–534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.014
9. Enemark, S., Bell, K. C., Lemmen, C., & McLaren, R. (2014). Fit-for-purpose land administration (FIG Publication No. 60). Copenhagen: FIG; World Bank. Available at: https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub60/figpub60.asp
10. Enemark, S., McLaren, R., & Lemmen, C. (2021). Fit-for-purpose land administration—Providing secure land rights at scale. Land, 10(9), 972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10090972
11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2012). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of national food security. Rome: FAO. Available at: https://www.fao.org/tenure/voluntary-guidelines/en
12. United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management. (2020). Framework for effective land administration (FELA). New York: UN-GGIM. Available at: https://ggim.un.org/FELA
13. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/governing-the-commons/
14. Alexander, E. R. (2002). The public interest in planning: From legitimation to substantive plan evaluation. Planning Theory, 1(3), 226–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100303
15. Pasakarnis, G., & Maliene, V. (2010). Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern Europe: Applying land consolidation. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 545–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.008
16. Perovych, L. M., Sai, V. M., & Malanchuk, M. S. (2015). Teoretychni zasady zemleustroiu: navchalnyi posibnyk [Theoretical foundations of land management: Textbook]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky.
17. Tretiak, A. M. (2013). Zemleustrii v Ukraini: teoriia, metodolohiia: monohrafiia [Land management in Ukraine: Theory, methodology: Monograph]. Kherson: Hrin D. S.
18. Tretiak, A. M. (2016). Paradyhma rozvytku suchasnoi teorii zemleustroiu v Ukraini [Paradigm of the development of modern land management theory in Ukraine]. Zemlevporiadnyi visnyk [Land Management Bulletin], 9, 20–23.
19. Zevenbergen, J., Augustinus, C., Antonio, D., & Bennett, R. (2013). Pro-poor land administration: Principles for recording the land rights of the underrepresented. Land Use Policy, 31, 595–604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Землеустрій, кадастр імоніторинг земель
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
