Territorial land-use planning in the context of formation the financial stability of the united local communities

Authors

  • A. Tretiak State Environmental Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management , Державна екологічна академія післядипломної освіти та управління Мінприроди України
  • V. Tretiak State Environmental Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management , Державна екологічна академія післядипломної освіти та управління Мінприроди України
  • T. Priadka National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • N. Tretiak State Environmental Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management , ДУ «Інститут економіки природокористування та сталого розвитку НАН України»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2017.01.021

Abstract

Territorial planning now is one of the essential attributes of management activities developed countries. The modern system of planning land- use in Ukraine now is not formed and balanced and does not provide positive results in achieving its high economic efficiency and environmental safety. Territorial planning of land use wasn’t needed by system of state and municipal administration because there are problems in the territorial land management which are related with insufficient compliance current needs of sustainable development. If planning of development in the cities (towns) is developed and makes of base planning documentation (general plans) then the area of land ownership and land use outside towns isn’t covered completely creation of land documents.

        In Ukraine in most scientific research view separate aspects of influence territorial use of planning the spatial organization of economic activities of local communities.

        For the new community situation in use land and natural resources became difficult, first of all through:

-underestimation of the complexity and specificity of land reform during land and economic reforms in Ukraine;

- local community hasn’t full information about  rights to land and other natural resources, their potential use and protection of the state;

- incompetence of system solving problems of land reform in the local councils, for example : remove communities from order of land in their territories, lands of state and municipal property aren’t separated, land reform and land tenure systems, especially in agriculture are incomplete;

- unsatisfactory legal and information support and protection of property rights of villagers to land and other natural resources;

- ignoring the problems of putting into economic turnover of land as a capital resource and integrated approach to village territories in  development  the transformation of land relations, absence of a balanced state land politics of planning of land use and land management with local communities and mechanisms of its implementation;

- lack of consistent state politics for the integrated development of land legislation, conduct and financing of state and municipal land management and land cadastre, formation of investment-attractive land-use;

- very poor information infrastructure of the land market and the lack of a balanced public politics formation and development of the non-agricultural land and agricultural use;

- lack of information ensuring for rural population about questions of opportunities for use of land and other natural resources in their territories in market conditions;

        This can be realised through the Program use and protection of land and natural resources in the community.

        As a result of their realization we can get:

- increase the investment attractiveness and efficiency of use potential of land and other natural resources, environmental security of land tenure;

- rationalization (optimization) of land use and creation of investment-attractive and sustainable land-use;

- improving the efficiency of land lease, especially in the agricultural and recreational facilities;

- increase revenues from payments for land and other natural resources to local budgets.

 

Keywords: Territorial planning development of land use, territorial planning, united local community, problems of contemporary land-use.

 

 

 

Author Biographies

  • A. Tretiak, State Environmental Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management, Державна екологічна академія післядипломної освіти та управління Мінприроди України
    Doctor of Economics, Professor, Corresponding Member of NAAS of Ukraine
  • V. Tretiak, State Environmental Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management, Державна екологічна академія післядипломної освіти та управління Мінприроди України
    Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor
  • T. Priadka, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
    Ph.D., Associate Professor 
  • N. Tretiak, State Environmental Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management, ДУ «Інститут економіки природокористування та сталого розвитку НАН України»
    PhD

References

Dorosh O. (2015). Orhanizatsiino-instytutsionalne zabezpechennia terytorialnoho planuvannia zemlekorystuvannia silskykh terytorii [Organizational and institutional support of territorial planning of land use of rural territories]. Ekonomist, 8, 22-25. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/econ_2015_8_7.

Martyn A. (2010). Sutnist proektnykh rishen u suchasnii dokumentatsii iz zemleustroiu [The essence of project decisions in modern land management documentation]. Zemleustrii i kadastr. 2, 14-23.

Khvesyk M., Bystriakov I., Klynovyi D. (2016). Prostorova orhanizatsiia ta napriamy vykorystannia pryrodnoho bahatstva Ukrainy [Spatial organization and directions of use of Ukraine's natural wealth]. Economy of Ukraine, 7, 46–65.

Bohme K. Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice Stockholm: Nordregio (2002) Available at: http://www.nordregio.se/Global/Publications/Publications%202002/R2002_8/Part1_p9.pdf

Glossary A., Pahl-Weber E., Henckel D. (2008). The Planning System and Planning Terms in Germany. Hanover, Germany: ARL, 246.

Priadka T., Korbut T. (2012) Naukovi aspekty orhanizatsii terytorialnoho planuvannia na suchasnomu etapi rozvytku zemelnykh vidnosyn [Scientific aspects of organization of territorial planning at the present stage of development of land relations]. Innovative economy, 9, 146–148.

Tretiak A., Kuryltsiv R., Tretiak N. (2013). Kontseptualni zasady rozvytku v Ukraini suchasnoi bahatofunktsionalnoi systemy upravlinnia zemelnymy resursamy [Conceptual framework for the development of modern multifunctional land management system in Ukraine]. Zemlevporiadnyi visnyk, 9, 25–28.

Tretiak A. (2008). Zakon formuvannia ekonomichnykh vidnosyn vlasnosti na zemliu [The law of formation of economic relations of ownership of land]. Zemlevporiadnyi visnyk, 5, 24-27.

Published

2017-06-21

Issue

Section

Land Management and Land Planning