Environmental and Economic Aspects of Afforestation in Ukraine in Terms of Sustainable Land ManagementEcological and economic aspects of forestry in Ukraine in the context of sustainable land using

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2019.02.06

Abstract

Over the last half a century, the total area of forests in the world has decreased significantly. Ukraine belongs to countries with low quantity of forests and deficient of woods, because the level of forest cover is 15.9% with the required optimal value of 25-30%. Steppe areas are characterized by 1.9–4.8% of forest cover. The current total area of forest land belonging to the forest fund of Ukraine is 10.4 million hectares, including 9.6 million hectares of forested vegetation, about 3.5 million hectares of forests have restrictions in forest management. In 2008–2017, 4.03 million hectares of forests were cut down in Ukraine and additionally destroyed by fire, pests, storms, and by poachers about 170.7 thousand hectares, only 16.3% of this area was recovered. In order to ensure optimal forest cover, it is necessary to differentially restore the forest area in Ukraine by 6.0–9.2 million hectares. The average field protective forest cover in some physical-geographical zones of Ukraine varies within 1.3–1.5%, the optimal should be 3.0–4.5%. In particular, about 76.0% of the territory of the steppe zone of Ukraine has insufficient forest cover, which causes systematic negative manifestations of water and wind erosion. This situation is complicated by the high level of agricultural development of the southern regions - up to 97%, which causes a low degree of environmental sustainability of landscapes to preserve soil fertility. Retrospective analysis showed a significant decrease in the area of forest protection strips over the past 60 years by 1.9–2.3 times. The total loss of protective forest strips in Ukraine over the last 10 years is 10 071 hectares, which has weakened the nature protection function of the forest plantation and caused the scale of water and wind erosion. The survey uses data from the State Statistics Service and the State Geo-cadastre of Ukraine during 2008–2017. Decryption of Earth remote sensing data and use of a series of correctly calibrated MODIS satellite images (geometric resolution 230 × 230 m) made it possible to determine the ratio of the spatial distribution of the forest fund to the agricultural land on the territory of Ukraine. Using the Zonal Statistics of Spatial Analyst Tools module, of the ArcGIS program was determined forested and plowed lands within separate administrative and territorial units. The difficult situation in Ukraine, in which the state of forest ecosystems does not meet the ecological and economic requirements, is caused by the complexity of management decisions in the field of forestry. The obtained results make it possible to substantiate the need for spatial-differential measures of forest restoration and implementation of land and water preservation measures for optimization of the land fund on the basis of adaptive-landscape principles, which allows to create preconditions for rational use and rehabilitation of forest and land resources of Ukraine.

Keywords: ecological and economic aspects, forest fund, protective forest strips, forest cover, plowing, ecological sustainability, sustainable land use, Ukraine, geomodeling.

Author Biographies

  • N. Dudiak, SHEI "Kherson State Agrarian University", ДВНЗ "Херсонський державний аграрний університет"
    Ph.D. in Economics, associate professor, Head of Department of Land Management, Geodesy and Cadastre
  • V. Pichura, SHEI "Kherson State Agrarian University", ДВНЗ "Херсонський державний аграрний університет"
    Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the Department of Ecology and Sustainable Development named after Professor Yu.V. Pilipenko
  • L. Potravka, SHEI "Kherson State Agrarian University", ДВНЗ "Херсонський державний аграрний університет"
    doctor of economic sciences, Head of the department of public administration and administration

References

State of the World - 2000 (2000) Report of the Institute for Worldwide Surveillance on Progress towards a Sustainable Society. Kyiv: Intelsfera, 8.

Shvydenko A.Z., Buksha I.F., Krakovskaya S.V. (2018) Ukraine's vulnerability to climate change: [monografiia]. Kiev: Nika-Center, 184.

Lisetskiy F., Pichura V. (2016) Steppe Ecosystem Functioning of the Eastern European Plain under the Age-Long Climatic Change Influence. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 9 (18), 1-9.

https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i18/93780

Pichura V.I., Potravka L.A., Dudiak N.V., Skrypchuk P.M., Stratichuk N.V. (2019) Retrospective and Forecast of Heterochronal Climatic Fluctuations Within the Territory of the Dnieper Basin. Indian Journal of Ecology, Vol. 46 (2), 402-407.

Pichura V.I. (2016) Agricultural disturbance of ecological stability of the Dnipro river basin. Scientific reports of NUBiP of Ukraine, No 5 (62): http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Dopovidi/article/view/7231/7010

Voronkov NA (1973) Valve and water availability of pine plantations. Moscow: Forestry, 184.

Kalinin G.P. (1950) The role of the forest in the distribution of precipitation. Questions of hydrometeorological efficiency of field protection forest reproduction. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 24-29.

Lisetskii F. N., Zemlyakova AV, Narozhnia A. G. etc. (2014) Geoplaning of rural territories: the experience of implementation of the concept of basin nature management at the regional level. The bulletin of the Odessa national university, No19., Vol.3 (22), 125-137.

Pobedinsky AV (1979) Water-protection and soil protection role of forests. Moscow: Forestry, 176.

Buryak J. A. (2015) Basin organization of nature management in the Belgorod ecoregion: the dissertation author's abstract: candidate. geogr. Sciences. 25.00.36. Moscow, 23.

Pichura V.I., Lisetsky F.N., Pavlyuk Ya.V. (2014) The centuries-old change in the stability of agro-landscapes in the zone of irrigation land reclamation of the dry steppe zone (on the example of the south of the Kherson region). Scientific reports of Belgorod State University: Natural Sciences, No. 17 (188), Vol. 28, 140-147.

Gensiruk S.A. (2002) Forest - the problem of state and world. Scientific works of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: Collected Works. sciences works Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic National University, Vol. 1, 22-26.

Petrovich O.Z. (2014) Protected forest bands in the context of implementing the concept of ecosystem services. Ecosystems, their optimization and protection, Vol. 11, 42-29.

Lukisha V.V. (2013) Ecological Functions of Protected Forest Plants. Ecological Sciences, No 1, 56-64.

Godovany A. Y. (2013) Protected forest bands have been in need of protection for more than twenty years. Legal aspects of the problem. Actual problems of politics, Vol. 49, 228-237.

Chorny S.G., Chornaya T.M. (2007) Causes and consequences of a dust storm March 23-24, 2007: ekhsuir.kspu.edu

Openko I.A., Yevsyukov T.O. (2014) Lands under field-protective forest plantations: current state, problems, solutions. Balanced Natural Resources, No. 1, 125-131.

Pylypenko O.I., Yukhnovsky V.Yu. (1998) Justification of the parameters of optimal field protection forest. Scientific herald of the National Academy of Sciences. Kyiv, Vol. 10, 326-342.

Stadnik AP (2012) Problems of protective forest growing and agroforestry in Ukraine and ways of their solution. Agrobiology, No. 8, 153-157.

Nazarenko V. (2012) Why do nobody need field-protecting forest bands?: http://www.gorod.cn.ua/news/gorod-i-region/37379-chomu-polezahisni-lisosmugi-nikomu-ne-potribni.html;

In Ukraine, the field-protecting forest strips are being shocked at the pace - the results of the monitoring of the State Geocodraw (2016): https://land.gov.ua/v-ukraini-shokuiuchymy-tempamy-znyshchuiutsia-polezakhysni-lisovi-smuhy-rezultaty-monitorynhu-derzhheokadastru/

Yukhnovsky V.Yu., Milyuga V.M., Shtofel M.O., Dudarets S.М. (2009) Ways of solving the problem of forest protection in Ukraine. Scientific works of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Lviv, 62-65.

Published

2019-11-11

Issue

Section

Economics and ecology of land use