The institutional theory trend of land organization and land planning development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2021.01.02

Abstract

Abstract. Land planning specialization of land relations and land use system has significantly strengthened the role and place of land planning activities in the development of the country's economy and its territories. However, the theory of land organization and land planning does not keep up with the demands of practice. The functions, subject and objects of land organization and land planning are declared to a limited extent. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to substantiate the current development of land organization and land planning in Ukraine on the basis of the latest institutional and behavioral economic theory. It is substantiated that land planning activity is a socio-economic institution that provides trust, understanding and   in the socio-economic area, through professional processing, submission and interpretation for users of land information about the facts and processes of organizations (institutions). In the narrow sense the land planning is the Institution of transformation using specific methods, rules (its formal component) and professional skills and judgments (informal component of the institution) of land managing facts in the language of numbers for understanding and manageability of all subjects of the socio-economic area. In a broad sense, land planning as an institution forms a certain face of land-tenure and land-use, state land institutions, public and other organizations (institutes) who organize and manage the use and protection of land and other natural resources and provide important informational content of local, regional, national and global socio-economic areas. The institution of land planning is primarily characterized by the state of the informal component, its ability to influence the adoption and compliance with the «rules of the game» through «organizations-institutions» (primarily associations of professional land surveyors). Influence the effective representation of management and economic activities related to land in society. This increase in theoretical ideas opens up new ways to develop land  planning and, consequently, land reform measures. Its scientific and legal components («rules of the game») are increasingly based on ideas, the influence of the professional environment, which should become more and more organizationally united. On the other hand, the institutional theory of land  planning opens the possibility and substantiates the need for the use of state regulatory bodies, scientific schools, professional associations of land surveyors, the ideology of «land planning engineering» and «land planning imperialism» in land policy.

Keywords. Institutional theory, land organization, land planning, land planning science, land planning activities.

Author Biographies

  • A. Tretiak, Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University
    Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Geodesy and Land Management
  • V. Tretiak, Sumy National Agrarian University
    Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Geodesy and Land Management
  • T. Priadka, Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University
    PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Head of of the Department of Land Resources Management and Cadastre
  • N. Kapinos, Sumy National Agrarian University
    PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Geodesy and Land Management

References

Tretiak A.M, Tretiak V.M. (2020). Conceptual foundations of a new institutional and behavioral economic theory for the land use economy of Ukraine. Modern problems in science. Abstracts of VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 163-166). - Prague: Czech Republic.

Tretiak, A.M. (2013), Zemleustrij v Ukrayini: teoriya, metodologiya. [Land organization in Ukraine: theory, methodology]. Kherson: OLDI-PLUS, 488.

Tretiak, A.M. (2006). Koncepciya vdoskonalennya zemelnyx vidnosyn v Ukrayini [The concept of improving land relations in Ukraine]. Zemlevporyadnyj visnyk, 3, 27-30.

Ha-Yun, Chang. (2017). Ekonomika: instrukziya z vukorustannya [Economics: User Guide]. Kyiv, Ukraine, 400.

Hodgson, Jeffrey. (2003). Ekonomicheskaya teoriya i instituty: Manifest sovremennoy institutsionalnoy ekonomicheskoy teorii [Economic theory and institutions: Manifesto of modern institutional economic theory]. Moscow, Russia: Delo, 464.

North, D. (1997). Instituty. institutsionalnyye izmeneniya i funktsionirovaniye ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional change and the economy functioning]. Moscow, Russia: Nachalo, 190.

Kaufmann. (2007) (Switzerland). Land Management Opportunities for Sustainable Development, Provided by the Cadastre 2014 Approach // Report of the FIG Commission 7. Work shop in Quebec City (2748) www.

Molen, P.V.D., Silayo, E.H., Tuladhar A.M. (2008). Land Administration Policies and Systems. Comparative Study to Land Policy in 9 Countries in Africa and Asia. Stockholm, 6.

Tretiak, A.M. (2013), Konceptualni zasady «zemleustrіj - 2030» [Conceptual principles of «land organization - 2030»]. Zemleustrij, kadastr i monitoryng zemel, 1-2, 4- 12.

Published

2021-03-03

Issue

Section

Land Management and Land Planning