Mobile LiDAR, geoinformation technologies and crowdsourcing for the documentation and preservation of cultural heritage objects in territorial communities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2025.04.010

Keywords:

geoinformation technologies, Lidar, amalgamated territorial community, historical and cultural heritage, sustainable development

Abstract

The article substantiates the integrated use of LiDAR technologies, geographic information systems (GIS) and crowdsourcing approaches for identifying, recording and monitoring historical and cultural heritage sites within local communities. It is emphasised that in the context of military action, urbanisation pressure and territorial transformations, cultural heritage is considered an important resource for sustainable development in accordance with UNESCO approaches and the World Heritage Sustainable Development Policy (2015).

It is shown that modern LiDAR systems, including sensors built into smartphones, provide dense point clouds and three-dimensional models of objects with sufficient accuracy to solve a significant part of the tasks of documentation and operational monitoring, although they are inferior to high-precision ground and airborne laser scanners. Particular attention is paid to the hypothesis regarding the possibility of creating 3D models of cultural heritage objects using common smartphone models with built-in LiDAR sensors and assessing the accuracy of measurements of such models.

To test the approach, a field scan of the local hydrological natural monument "Natural Spring" within the Shpanivska territorial community of the Rivne region was performed using a smartphone with a LiDAR module. Processing point clouds in Polycam, AutoCAD, PIX4D, 3ds Max, and Blender software made it possible to build a 3D model of the structure and estimate the relative error in measuring linear dimensions. For a reference section 210 cm long, the relative measurement error was 2.04%, which is consistent with the results of international studies on the accuracy of mobile LiDAR sensors, which demonstrate millimetre-centimetre accuracy for small objects and centimetre-decimetre errors in complex environments.

The technical limitations of mobile LiDAR (limited scanning range, reduction in density and accuracy with distance, sensitivity to surface properties, influence of the operator's scanning trajectory, need for control measurements) were analysed and the prospects for their application for mass crowdsourced data collection on heritage objects were demonstrated. Based on an analysis of geocrowdsourcing experience, it is argued that the combination of the prevalence of smartphones, mobile LiDAR sensors and web GIS creates the conditions for the formation of distributed information systems for recording, monitoring and preliminary assessment of the condition of monuments at the level of local communities, provided that data standardisation and quality control procedures are implemented.

Keywords: geoinformation technologies, Lidar, amalgamated territorial community, historical and cultural heritage, sustainable development.

Author Biographies

  • A. Koshel, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
    Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor
  • I. Kolhanova, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
    Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor
    
    Senior Lecturer, Department of Land Management Planning
  • A. Poltavets, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
    Doctor of Economics,
    
    Associate Professor of the Department of Geoinformatics and Aerospace Research of the Earth
  • V. Yukhymiuk, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
    Master's degree, 2nd year of study, Master's degree, Department of Geoinformatics and Aerospace Research of the Earth

References

1. Chetverikov, B., Babii, L., Kuzyk, Z., Zaiats, I., & Protsyk, M. (2022). Doslidzhennia tsyfrovykh modelei reliefu nerukhomykh obiektiv istoryko-kulturnoi spadshchyny, stvorenykh za rizni roky [Study of digital terrain models of immovable objects of historical and cultural heritage created in different years]. Heodeziia, kartohrafiia i aerofotoznimannia, 96, 65–76.

2. Birova, O. (2023). Istoryko-kulturna spadshchyna Ukrainy: tsyfrovi tekhnolohii zberezhennia ta populiaryzatsiia v umovakh voiennykh dii [Historical and cultural heritage of Ukraine: digital technologies for preservation and popularization under wartime conditions]. Naukovo-teoretychnyi almanakh Hrani, 26(5), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.15421/1723106

3. Kalynych, I. V., Chetverikov, B., & Khintsitskyi, O. (2021). Metodyka kartohrafuvannia obiektiv istoryko-kulturnoi spadshchyny zasobamy HIS-tekhnolohii iz vykorystanniam arkhivnykh kartohrafichnykh ta aeromaterialiv [Methodology of mapping historical and cultural heritage objects using GIS technologies with archival cartographic and aerial materials]. Suchasni dosiahnennia heodezychnoi nauky ta vyrobnytstva, I(41), 97–103.

4. Vecco, M. (2010). A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11, 321–324.

5. Slla, M., Gonçalves, L. M. S., Gonçalves, G., Francisco, C., Puente, I., Providência, P., Gaspar, F., & Rodrigues, H. (2020). A Building Information Modeling Approach to Integrate Geomatic Data for the Documentation and Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Remote Sensing, 12(24), 4028. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244028

6. Bruno, N., & Roncella, R. (2019). HBIM for Conservation: A New Proposal for Information Modeling. Remote Sensing, 11, 1751.

7. López, F. J., Lerones, P. M., Llamas, J., Gómez-García-Bermejo, J., & Zalama, E. (2018). A Review of Heritage Building Information Modeling (H-BIM). Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2, 21.

8. Remondino, F., & Rizzi, A. (2010). Reality-based 3D documentation of natural and cultural heritage sites—techniques, problems, and examples. Applied Geomatics, 2(3), 85–100.

9. Dhonju, H. K., Xiao, W., Shakya, B., Mills, J. P., & Sarhosis, V. (2017, April). Documentation of heritage structures through geo-crowdsourcing and web-mapping. In The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (Vol. 42, pp. 17–21). Copernicus Publications.

10. Koutsoudis, A., Vidmar, B., Ioannakis, G., Arnaoutoglou, F., Pavlidis, G., & Chamzas, C. (2014). Multi-image 3D reconstruction data evaluation. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(1), 73–79.

11. Boochs, F., Heinz, G., Huxhagen, U., & Müller, H. (2007, October). Low-cost image based system for nontechnical experts in cultural heritage documentation and analysis. In XXI International CIPA Symposium, AntiCIPAting the future of the cultural past. 01–06.

12. Jaafar, H. A., Meng, X., Sowter, A., & Bryan, P. (2017). New approach for monitoring historic and heritage buildings: Using terrestrial laser scanning and generalised analysis. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 24(11), e1987.

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Geoinformation technologies for modeling the state of geosystems