Calculation of the illuminance coefficient and energy performance of buildings in the design of urban development.

Authors

  • R. Rudyi Uman National University of Horticulture image/svg+xml
  • Yu. Kyselov Уманський національний унівеситет , Uman National University of Horticulture image/svg+xml
  • O. Kravets Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas , Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas image/svg+xml
  • P. Borovyk Uman National University of Horticulture image/svg+xml
  • M. Shemiakin Uman National University of Horticulture image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2026.02.06

Keywords:

urban development design, autonomous energy supply, solar energy, building roof, luminance coefficient

Abstract

The use of solar panels as a source of energy supply, not only for industrial enterprises but also for private buildings, began in Ukraine in the early twenty-first century. Widespread adoption became evident approximately a decade later, when the number of households equipped with solar power systems increased rapidly following the introduction of the so-called “green tariff”. The necessity for autonomous energy supply for individual houses has become even more acute in the context of the ongoing war.

The object of this research may be considered the aspect (orientation) of the slopes of gable roofs in the spatial planning of residential areas, while the aim is to determine the amount of solar radiation incident on roof surfaces of different orientations equipped with photovoltaic panels.

The article sets the task, based on the principles of geodetic astronomy, of determining optimal parameters for the orientation of solar panels installed on building roofs in order to maximise electricity generation. The calculations were performed for the day of the summer solstice under the conditions of the city of Ivano-Frankivsk. The value of the optimal roof pitch angle was adopted from existing literature sources. The conducted study illustrates how roof orientation affects the potential for solar energy utilisation. The calculated values of the solar energy coefficient K and the amount of solar energy Eₛ for different orientation scenarios of gable roofs enable the formulation of relevant conclusions.

The results of the study indicate that the optimal orientation of roof slopes for the installation of small-scale energy systems is the east–west configuration, which allows for maximising solar energy generation throughout the daylight period. In this case, the east-facing slope is active from sunrise until noon, while the west-facing slope is active from noon until sunset. In contrast, with a north–south roof orientation, the southern slope exhibits increased activity only for a relatively short period around midday, which is insufficient to ensure high efficiency throughout the entire daylight period. As expected, the northern slope receives the least solar radiation and, consequently, demonstrates the lowest efficiency in electricity generation. Roofs with diagonal orientations (north-west–south-east or north-east–south-west) provide a more uniform distribution of solar radiation throughout the day.

Received: 28.04.2026;

Accepted: 15.05.2026;

Author Biographies

  • R. Rudyi, Uman National University of Horticulture

    Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

  • Yu. Kyselov, Уманський національний унівеситет, Uman National University of Horticulture

    Doctor of Geographical Sciences, Professor

  • O. Kravets, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas

    Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

  • P. Borovyk, Uman National University of Horticulture

    Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

  • M. Shemiakin, Uman National University of Horticulture

    Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor

References

1. De vynajshly soniachni paneli [Where solar panels were invented]. (n.d.). Available at: https://www.ecotech.ua/de-vynajshly-sonyachni-paneli/

2. Levchenko, O. M., & Shynkarenko, H. A. (2003). Modeliuvannia protsesiv pohlynannia soniachnoi enerhii diliankamy realnoi mistsevosti [Modeling solar energy absorption processes for real terrain areas]. Heodeziia, kartohrafiia i aerofotoznimannia, 63, 241–245. Available at: https://science.lpnu.ua/istcgcap/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-63-2003/modeling-solar-energy-absorption-processes-real

3. Makovetskyi, B. I., Diachenko, O. S., & Troshyn, M. Yu. (2024). Rozrobka metodyky obstezhennia tekhnichnoho stanu dakhiv zhytlovykh budynkiv dlia roztashuvannia elektrychnykh soniachnykh batarei [Development of a methodology for assessing roof condition for solar panel placement]. Ukrainskyi zhurnal budivnytstva ta arkhitektury, 1(1), 99–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30838/J.BPSACEA.2312.270224.99.1029

4. Otsinka enerhii soniachnoho vyprominiuvannia [Assessment of solar radiation energy]. (n.d.). Available at: http://eco-electrics.com.ua

5. Rudyi, R. M., Kyselov, Yu. O., & Kravets, O. Ya. (2020). Do analizu zsuvnykh protsesiv na terytorii Natsionalnoho dendrolohichnoho parku “Sofiivka” z vykorystanniam HIS-tekhnolohii [Analysis of landslide processes in Sofiivka park using GIS technologies]. Visnyk Umanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu sadivnytstva, 2, 130–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31395/2310-0478-2020-2-130-133

6. Yurin, Yu., Zyhun, A., Halinska, T., & Avrmenko, Yu. (2021). Vyznachennia umov insoliatsii ta vybir optymalnoi oriientatsii zhytlovykh budynkiv [Determining insolation conditions and optimal building orientation]. Haluzeve mashynobuduvannia, budivnytstvo, 1(56), 87–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26906/znp.2021.56.2512

7. Ebhota, W. S., & Tabakov, P. Y. (2026). Roof orientation as a determinant of solar PV efficiency in sustainable smart city development. Journal of Umm Al Qura University for Engineering and Architecture. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43995-025-00275-1

8. Hamidi, S., & Asfour, O. S. (2025). Design strategies for building integrated photovoltaics in high rise buildings: A systematic review. Architecture, 5(4), 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture5040118

9. Kereush, D., & Perovych, I. (2017). Determining criteria for optimal site selection for solar power plants. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape, 4, 39–54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15576/GLL/2017.4.39

10. Kyselov, Yu. O., Rudyi, R. M., Kravets, O. Ya., Borovyk, P. M., & Parakhnenko, V. H. (2025). To the consideration of territory relief features in the land cadastre. Geodesy, Cartography and Aerial Photography, 101, 35–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/istcgcap2025.101.035

11. Li, H. X., Zhang, Y., Edwards, D., et al. (2020). Improving the energy production of roof-top solar PV systems through roof design. Building Simulation, 13(2), 475–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0585-6

12. Manani, R., Nursaniah, C., & Caisarina, I. (2026). The influence of building orientation on thermal performance in Palapa Village housing, Lhokseumawe. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 12(1), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20261201.11

13. Miao, Y., Liu, P., Fu, I. C. S., Lei, Q., Lau, S. S. Y., & Tao, Y. (2022). The study of architectural geometry and shape in the energy balance of glazed roofs. Buildings, 12(10), 1550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101550

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Geodetic support in the construction of residential, industrial and transport facilities

How to Cite

Rudyi, R., Kyselov, Y., Kravets, O., Borovyk, P., & Shemiakin, M. (2026). Calculation of the illuminance coefficient and energy performance of buildings in the design of urban development. Land Management, Cadastre and Land Monitoring, 2. https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2026.02.06