Economic and bio-energetic efficiency of spring rapeseed crop growing of hybrid Yura

Authors

  • V. G. Nosenko National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/agr2018.294.041

Keywords:

ріпак ярий, удобрення, норма висіву, економічна ефективність вирощування, біоенергетична ефективність вирощування

Abstract

The highest profit was obtained by applying fertilizer (N90P75K120) - 4828
UAH / ha for a profitability of 102%, the lowest - at the lowest dose of fertilizers
N45P30K45 - 2008 UAH / ha, while the profitability was 63%. In terms of fertilizer
N60P45K60 profit was 3616 UAH / ha with a profitability of 97%, and the value of
gross output amounted to 7336 UAH.
The use of fertilizer borers N120P75K120 slightly increased the cost compared
to the option with the highest profit - from 4720 to 4947 UAH / ha, but the profitability
dropped to 71%.
Thus, according to economic indicators of profit per hectare and profitability,
the best result was the fertilizer variant N90P75K120, where the value of gross output
was UAH 9548. A further increase in fertilizer rates led to a decrease in these indicators
and in this case it was not economically feasible.
The lowest energy consumption was in the experiment without fertilizer
application (28952 MJ), while the energy efficiency ratio was 4.99. At the same time,
the highest energy consumption was characterized by the use of mineral fertilizers in
the amount of N90P75K120 and nitrogen feed (30 kg / ha) - 56095 MJ, with an energy
efficiency ratio of 2.96. With further increase in fertilizer rates, the energy output with
the harvest decreased.
Hybrid Yura is recommended to grow according to the technology, which
provides for the introduction of mineral fertilizers at the rate of N90P75K120 kg / ha
d. P. For the seed rate of 1.0 million similar seeds. It is proved that such a fertilizer rate
is economically advantageous and expedient from the standpoint of economic and
energy efficiency under the given growing conditions.

References

Bardin, Y. B. (2000). Ripak: vid sivby do pererobky [Rape: from sowing to processing]. Kyiv: World, 106.

Tarariko, Yu. O., Nesmashna, O. Yu., Berdnikov, O. M. (2005). Bioenerhetychna otsinka silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoho vyrobnytstva [Bioenergy evaluation of agricultural production (Scientific and methodological support)] / ed. Yu.O. TaraRico. Kyiv: Agrarian Science, 205.

Brikman, V. I., Evteev, A. S., Yurgin, S. A. (1989). Raps, surepitsa i red'ka maslichnaya v Vostochnoy Sibiri [Raps, rape and oilseed radish in Eastern Siberia]. Moscow: Rosagropromizdat, 60.

Garbar, L. A., Nosenko, V. G. (2010). Udobreniye kak faktor formirovaniya produktivnosti rapsa yarovogo [Fertilizer as a factor in the formation of spring rapeseed productivity] Proceedings of the Intern. scientific-practical conferences within the framework of the International Scientific and Practical Forum "Science and the Agro-Industrial Complex at the Present Stage" dedicated to the 170th anniversary of the EI "Belarusian State Agricultural Academy". Gorki, 267.

Gusev, M. G. (2010). Ekonomiko-enerhetychna otsinka promizhnykh posiviv kormovykh ahrotsenoziv v umovakh zroshennya Pivdnya Ukrayiny [Economic-energy estimation of intermediate crops of fodder agrocenoses in conditions of irrigation of the South of Ukraine]. Irrigated agriculture, 54. 65-74.

Reports of the USDA Agency reports the Ministry of Agriculture. Available at: https://www.usda.gov/media/agency-reports (Appointment Date: 10/11/2018).

[Instructions and standards for determining the economic and energy efficiency of fertilizer use] (1987) Moscow: Soyuzselkhozkhimiya, 42.

Karpenko, A. M. (2012). Priorytetni napryamy innovatsiynoho rozvytku roslynnytstva [Priority directions of innovative development of crop production[. Economics and management of agro-industrial complex, 9, 16-20.

Published

2019-01-04

Issue

Section

Рослинництво та кормовиробництво